2,814
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

East Asian approaches of activation: the politics of labor market policies in South Korea and Taiwan

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Amenta, E., & Tierney, A. (2014). Political Institutions and U.S. Social Policy. In D. Béland, K. Morgan, & C. Howard (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of U.S. Social Policy (pp. 151–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Armingeon, K. (2012). The Politics of Fiscal Responses to the Crisis of 2008–2009. Governance, 25(4), 543–565.
  • Brun, D., & Diamond, L. (Eds.). (2014). Clientelism, social policy, and the quality of democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Castles, S. (1998). New migrations in the Asia-Pacific region: A force for social and political change. International Social Science Journal, 50(156), 215–228.
  • Chen, F. L. (2010). Unemployment and the government’s role in a risk society: A case study in Taiwan. In R. Chan, M. Takahashi, & L. R. Wang (Eds.), Risk and public policy in East Asia (pp. 115–132). Surrey. UK: Ashgate.
  • Chen, Y. W. (2011). Once a NEET always a NEET? Experiences of employment and unemployment among youth in a job training program in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 33–42.
  • Cheng, T.-J. (2003). Political Institutions and the Malaise of East Asian new democracies. Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(1), 1–41.
  • Cheong, J. M. (2018). Transition in the party politics and the party of the electorate. Goyang: Ingansarang (in Korean).
  • Committee for Promoting Segyehwa (ed.) (1995). Vision and strategy of segyehwa. Seoul: Committee for Promoting Segyehwa (in Korean).
  • Croissant, A., & Merkel, W. (2004). Political party formation in presidential and parliamentary system. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Philippine Office Online Paper. Retrieved from https://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/philippinen/50072.pdf
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Fu, L. Y. (1993). The social control essence of the social insurance system in Taiwan. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 15, 39–64 (in Chinese).
  • Gang, S. W. (2015). Evaluating the employment creation program for the vulnerable. Seoul: National Assembly of Budget Office (in Korean).
  • Goodman, R., & White, G. (1998). Welfare orientalism and the Search for an East Asian welfare model. In R. Goodman, G. White, & H. J. Kwon (Eds.), The East Asian welfare model: Welfare orientalism and the state (pp. 3–24). London: Routledge.
  • Hankyoreh21. (2004). How far the demeaning comments about the elderly? Hankyoreh21, 504. 2004. 04.07. Retrieved from http://h21.hani.co.kr/arti/special/special_general/10732.html (in Korean).
  • Hibbs, D. A., Jr. (1977). Political parties and macroeconomic policy. The American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1467–1487.
  • Higgs, R. (1987). Crisis and leviathan. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48, 706–723.
  • Hsiao, H. H., & Lin, K. M. (Eds). (2000). Social welfare movements in Taiwan. Taipei: Chuliu Publishing (in Chinese).
  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2014, August 28–31). Partisan Impacts on social policy and distributive outcomes in the eras of welfare state expansion and retrenchment, Paper presented at the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C..
  • Hung, S. C. (2006). Taiwan labor movements. Taipei: Huali Publisher (in Chinese).
  • Hutchcroft, P. (2014). Linking capitalism and countryside: Patronage and Clientelism in Japan, Thailand, and the Philippines. In D. Brun & L. Diamond (Eds.), Clientelism, social policy, and the quality of democracy (pp. 174–203). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Joint Ministries. (2016). Policy measures for the integrated and efficient management of the direct job creation program. Seoul: Author.
  • Keefer, P. (2007). Clientelism, credibility and the policy choice of young democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 804–821.
  • Kim, T., Kwon, H., Lee, J., & Yi, I. (2011). Poverty, inequality, and democracy: “mixed governance” and welfare in South Korea. Journal of Democracy, 22(3), 120–134.
  • Kim, W. S., & Choi, Y. J. (2014). Revisiting the role of bureaucrats in pension policy-making: The case of South Korea. Government and Opposition, 49(2), 264–289.
  • Kim, W. S., & Nam, Y. C. (2011). The development of social policy under the Lee Myung-Bak government: Is Korean welfare expansion at an end? The Journal of Asiatic Studies, 54(1), 119–152 (in Korean).
  • Kim, Y. S. (2010). Institutions and interest representation and the welfare state in post-democratization Korea. Asian Perspectives, 34(1), 159–189.
  • Kim, Y.-M. (2008). Beyond East Asian welfare productivism in South Korea. Policy and Politics, 36(1), 109–125.
  • Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. (2007). Citizen-politician linkages: An Introduction. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies (pp. 1–49). New York: Cambridge Press.
  • Kitschelt, H. (2007). The demise of clientelism in affluent capitalist democracies. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies (pp. 298–321). New York: Cambridge Press.
  • Kitschelt, H., & Kselman, D. (2013). Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties’ linkage strategies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1453–1484.
  • KORDI. (2017). 2017 statistical trends of the labor force development of the aged. Seoul: Author (in Korean)
  • Ku, Y. W. (1997). Welfare capitalism in Taiwan: State, economy and social policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Ku, Y. W., & Chang, Y. F. (2017). To be or not to be part of greater China: Social development in the Post-Ma Taiwan. Social Policy & Administration, 51(6), 898–915.
  • Kwan, C. P. (2000). Unemployment-related benefit systems in South Korea. RP21/99-00. Hong Kong: Research and Library Services Division.
  • Kwon, H. J. (1998). Democracy and the politics of social welfare: A comparative analysis of welfare systems in East Asia. In R. Goodman, G. White, & H. Kwon (Eds.), The East Asian welfare model (pp. 27–73). London: Routledge.
  • Kwon, H. J. (2001). Globalization, unemployment and policy responses in Korea. Global Social Policy, 1(2), 213–234.
  • Kwon, H. J. (Ed.). (2005). Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. New York: Routledge, UNRISD.
  • Kwon, S. M., & Holliday, I. (2007). The korean welfare state: A paradox of expansion in an Era of globalisation and economic crisis. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16, 242–248.
  • Lee, C. H. (2009). Limited decentralization and differential steering analysis of the public employment service regime. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 6(2), 127–168 (in Chinese).
  • Lee, C. H. (2010). The practical dilemma of employment insurance’s unemployment benefit institutions in the mode of activation governance. Taiwan Democracy Quarterly, 7(2), 125–176 (in Chinese).
  • Lee, H. J. (1999). Globalization and the emerging welfare state: The experience of South Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare, 8(1), 23–37.
  • Lee, Y. J. (1992). Political economy analysis of the trade union policy in Taiwan. Taipei: Juliu Press (in Chinese).
  • Lee, Y. J., & Ku, Y.-W. (2007). Opportunity opening or structural constraints? Yo-Yo Trajectory for the Taiwanese Young Adult’s Transition from school to work. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 67, 105–152 (in Chinese).
  • Lee, Y. K. (2011). Militants or Partisans: labor unions and democratic politics in Korea and Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Lee, Y. K. (2017). Roads Untraveled: Redefining “democracy” through the 2016 protest movement in Korea. Analyses & Alternatives, 1(1), 17–30.
  • Lin, T. H. (2009). Post-industrializing Taiwan: changing class structure and social inequality, 1992–2007. Taiwanese Journal of Sociology, 43, 93–158 (in Chinese).
  • Lin, W. I. (2006). Taiwanese social welfare: historical experiences and institutional analysis. Taipei: Wunan Publishing Company (in Chinese).
  • Lyne, M. (2007). Rethinking economics and institutions: The voter’s dilemma and democratic accountability. In H. Kitschelt & S. Wilkinson (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies (pp. 159–181). New York: Cambridge Press.
  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class: And other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ministry of Labor. (2016). The 20-year history of Korean employment insurance. Sejong: Author (in Korean).
  • OECD. (2009). Policy responses to the economic crisis: investing in innovation for long-term growth. Paris: Author.
  • Park, W. A. (2010). Evaluation and tasks of the economic crisis. Korean Economic Forum, 3(1), 13–41 (in Korean).
  • Peng, I., & Wong, J. (2008). Institutions and institutional purpose: Continuity and change in East Asian social policy. Politics and Society, 36(1), 61–88.
  • Piattoni, S. (2001). Clientelism in historical and comparative perspective. In S. Piattoni (Ed.), Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation (pp. 1–30). New York: Cambridge Press.
  • Presidential Committee on the Quality of Life. (2002). Productive welfare: paradigm shift in social policy. Seoul: PCQL (in Korean).
  • Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy: politics in an age of distrust. Trans. Goldhammer, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  • Schmidt, M. G. (1996). When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research, 30(2), 155–183.
  • Seong, J. M. (2016). Historical tracking of unemployment benefits. Monthly Labor Review, 2016(11), 20–37 (in Korean).
  • Seong, K. R. (2015). The Emergence of a dual cleavage structure and change in voting mechanism in the 18th presidential election in Korea. Korean Journal of Sociology, 49(2), 193–231.
  • Seoul Central Prosecutors’ Office. (2009). Illegal, violent protests against US beef imports: White paper investigation. Seoul: Author (in Korean).
  • Shin, D. M. (2001). Social welfare policy during the Kim Young-sam government: Globalization and social welfare. Yonsei Social Welfare Review, 6(7), 79–103 (in Korean).
  • Shughart, W. F. (2011). The new deal and modern memory. Southern Economic Journal, 77(3), 515–542.
  • Sisajeoneol. (2017). The scale of participation in the candlelight demonstration is in line with survey results. 2017.03.17. Seoul: Author (in Korean).
  • Skocpol, T. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Stokes, S., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., & Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, voters, and clientelism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Takahashi, Y. (2017). Poverty, Clientelism and Democratic Accountability in Mexico. WINPEC Working Paper Series No. E1620. March 2017. Waseda University, Japan.
  • The 18th President of the Transition Committee. (2013). The white book: Park, Geun-hye government’s tasks for a New Era of hope. Seoul: Author (in Korean).
  • Tsai, S. L. (2004). Effects of higher education expansion on inequality of educational opportunity. Taiwanese Sociology, 7, 47–88 (in Chinese).
  • Tseng, Y. F. (2007). Migrating to Taiwan: Appraisals and critiques to sociological inquiry on immigration. Taiwan: A Radical Journal of Social Research, 66, 75–103 (in Chinese).
  • Wang, J. H. (1989). Political transformation and opposition movement in Taiwan. Taiwan: A Radical Quarterly in Social Studies, 2(1), 71–116 (in Chinese).
  • Wong, J. (2004). Health democracies: welfare politics in Taiwan and South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.