2,132
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

Global policies for moving cities: the role of think tanks in the proliferation of Bus Rapid Transit systems in Latin America and worldwide

ORCID Icon

References

  • Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2007). Beyond the territorial fix: Regional assemblages, politics and power. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1161–1175.
  • Ardila, A. (2004). Transit planning in Curitiba and Bogotá, roles in interaction, risk, and change (Dissertation) (Vol. 201). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.
  • Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2011). What have we learned from policy transfer research? Dolowitz and Marsh revisited. Political Studies Review, 9(3), 366–378.
  • Bok, R., & Coe, N. M. (2017). Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities. Cities, 63, 51–57.
  • Brenner, N. (1999). Globalisation as reterritorialisation: The re-scaling of urban governance in the European Union. Urban Studies, 36(3), 431–451.
  • Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Catalogue. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/b/oxp/obooks/9780199270064.html
  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2012). Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Spaces of Neoliberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. doi:10.1002/9781444397499
  • Deng, T., & Nelson, J. D. (2013). Bus Rapid Transit implementation in Beijing: An evaluation of performance and impacts. Research in Transportation Economics, 39(1), 108–113.
  • Díaz Del Castillo, A., Sarmiento, O. L., Reis, R. S., & Brownson, R. C. (2011). Translating evidence to policy: Urban interventions and physical activity promotion in Bogotá, Colombia and Curitiba, Brazil. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 1(2), 350–360.
  • Dollowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(1), 5–24.
  • Duarte, F., & Rojas, F. (2012). Intermodal connectivity to BRT: A comparative analysis of Bogotá and Curitiba. Journal of Public Transportation, 15(2), 1–18.
  • Evans, M. (2009). New directions in the study of policy transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 237–241.
  • Filipe, L. N., & Macário, R. (2013). A first glimpse on policy packaging for implementation of BRT projects. Research in Transportation Economics, 39(1), 150–157.
  • Foucault, M. (1985). Discipline and punish: The birth of the Prision. 1926–1984. In Discipline and Punish the birth of the prison (Vol. 1). Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/random048/95203580.html
  • Froschauer, P. (2010). An analysis of the South African Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) policy implementation paradigm. Proceedings of the 29th Southern African transport conference (SATC 2010) (pp. 16–19). Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/14844/Froschauer_Analysis%282010%29.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • Haas, P. (2015). Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. In Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315717906
  • Harris, A., & Moore, S. (2013). Planning histories and practices of circulating urban knowledge. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1499–1509.
  • Hermann, G., & Hidalgo, D. (2004). The Bogotá model for sustainable transportation: Inspiring developing cities throughout the world. Trialog, 82, 11–15.
  • Hidalgo, D., & Huizenga, C. (2013). Implementation of sustainable urban transport in Latin America. Research in Transportation Economics, 40(1), 66–77.
  • Hidalgo, D., & King, R. (2014). Public transport integration in Bogotá and Cali, Colombia – Facing transition from semi-deregulated services to full regulation citywide. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 166–175.
  • ITDP – Institute for Transportation and Development Policy. (2018). History of ITDP. https://www.itdp.org/who-we-are/history-of-itdp/
  • Jajamovich, G. (2013). Miradas sobre intercambios internacionales y circulación internacional de ideas y modelos urbanos. Andamios, 10(22), 91–111.
  • Jajamovich, G. (2016). Historicizing the circulation of urban policies through career paths analysis: Barcelonian experts and their role in redeveloping Buenos Aires’ Puerto Madero. Iberoamericana, 18, 2010.
  • Jajamovich, G. (2018a). Puerto Madero en Movimiento. Un abordaje a partir de la circulación de la Corporación Antiguo Puerto Madero (1989–2017) (IEALC). TeseoPress. Buenos Aires.
  • Jajamovich, G. (2018b). Promoting large urban projects: (trans)local issues in Puerto Madero (Buenos Aires), 1989–2017. Revista De Urbanismo, (38), 1. doi:10.5354/0717-5051.2018.46811
  • James, O., & Lodge, M. (2003). The limitations of ‘policy transfer’ and ‘lesson drawing’ for public policy research. Political Studies Review, 1(2), 179–193.
  • Jara-Moreno, A. (2012). How Bogotá inspired sustainable cities across the globe. Retrieved from This Big City website http://thisbigcity.net/how-bogota-inspired-sustainable-cities-across-the-globe
  • JICA. (1996). Estudio del Plan Maestro del Transporte Urbano de Santa Fé de Bogotá en la República de Colombia.
  • Kain, J. F. (1975). How to improve urban transportation at practically no cost. Public Policy, 20(Summer 1972), 335–358. Translation by Alvaro Pachón. Como mejorar el transporte urbano a un costo minimo.
  • Larner, W., & Laurie, N. (2010). Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water. Geoforum, 41(2), 218–226.
  • Levinson, H., Zimmerman, S., Clinger, J., & Rutherford, G. (2002). Bus Rapid Transit: An overview. Journal of Public Transportation, 5(2), 1–30.
  • Lindau, L. A., Hidalgo, D., & de Almeida Lobo, A. (2014). Barriers to planning and implementing Bus Rapid Transit systems. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 9–15.
  • Lovell, H. (2017). Mobile policies and policy streams: The case of smart metering policy in Australia. Geoforum, 81, 100–108.
  • Lovell, H. (2019). Policy failure mobilities. Progress in Human Geography, 43(1), 46–63.
  • Mallqui, Y. Y. C., & Pojani, D. (2017). Barriers to successful bus rapid transit expansion: Developed cities versus developing megacities. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 5(2), 254–266.
  • Mccann, E. (2011a). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.
  • McCann, E. (2011b). Veritable inventions: Cities, policies and assemblage. Area, 43(2), 143–147.
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2010). Relationality/territoriality: Toward a conceptualization of cities in the world. Geoforum, 41(2), 175–184.
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012). Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age. In International planning studies (Vol. 17). doi: 10.1080/13563475.2012.698062
  • McCann, E. (2011). Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age. University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis.
  • Mejía-Dugand, S., Hjelm, O., Baas, L., & Ríos, R. A. (2013). Lessons from the spread of bus rapid transit in Latin America. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50(50), 82–90.
  • Montero, S. (2017). Study tours and inter-city policy learning: Mobilizing Bogotá’s transportation policies in Guadalajara. Environment and Planning A, 49(2), 332–350.
  • Montero, S. (2017a). Persuasive practitioners and the art of simplification. Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, 36(01), 13–34.
  • Montero, S. (2017b). Worlding Bogotá’s Ciclovía. Latin American Perspectives, 44(2), 111–131.
  • Nakamura, F., Makimura, K., & Toyama, Y. (2017). Perspective on an urban transportation strategy with BRT for developing cities. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 44(3), 196–201.
  • Nikitas, A., & Karlsson, M. (2015). A worldwide state-of-the-art analysis for Bus Rapid Transit: Looking for the success formula. Journal of Public Transportation, 18(1), 1–33.
  • Novick, A. (2009). La ciudad, el urbanismo y los intercambios internacionales. Notas para la discusión. Revista Iberoamericana de Urbanismo, 1, 4–13.
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.
  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30.
  • Pochet, P., Room, G., Benchmarking, S., Making, P., Mosher, S., Matsaganis, M., … Holder, J. (2006). When do policy innovations spread? Lessons for advocates of lesson-drawing. Harvard Law Review, 119(5), 1467–1487.
  • Porto de Oliveira, O., & Pal, L. (2018). Nuevas fronteras y rumbos en la investigación sobre transferencia, difusión y circulación de políticas públicas: Agentes, espacios, resistencia y traducciones TT - Novas fronteiras e direções na pesquisa sobre transferência, difusão e circulação de polít. A Revista de Administração Pública (Online), 52(2), 199–220. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-76122018000200199
  • Porto de Oliveira, O., & Pimenta de Faria, C. A. (2017). Policy transfer, diffusion and circulation. Novos Estudos, 36(107), 13–32.
  • Rizvi, A., & Sclar, E. (2014). Implementing bus rapid transit: A tale of two Indian cities. Research in Transportation Economics, 48, 194–204.
  • Robinson, J. (2011). The spaces of circulating knowledge: City strategies and global urban governmentality. In K. McCann & E. Y. Ward (Eds.), Globalization and community : Mobile urbanism : Cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 15–40). Minnesota University Press. Minneapolis, MN and London, UK. 2011
  • Rose, R. (1991). What is lesson-drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11, 3. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jnlpup/v11y1991i01p3-30_00.html
  • Sengers, F., & Raven, R. (2015). Toward a spatial perspective on niche development: The case of bus rapid transit. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 166–182.
  • Silva Ardila, D. (2016). Policy mobilities and urban change: The case of bus rapid transit in Colombia (Dissertation). University of Illinois at Chicago.
  • Sosa López, O., & Montero, S. (2018). Expert-citizens: Producing and contesting sustainable mobility policy in Mexican cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 67(June2016), 137–144.
  • Stone, D. (1996). Capturing the political imagination: Think tanks and the policy process. London: Frank Cass.
  • Stone, D. (2000). Non-governmental policy transfer: The strategies of independent policy institutes. Governance, 13(1), 45–70.
  • Stone, D. (2001). Learning lessons, policy transfer and the international diffusion of policy ideas. CSGR Working Paper No. 69/01 April 2001. Available at: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/2056/1/WRAP_Stone_wp6901.pdf
  • Stone, D. (2002a). Global knowledge networks. Global Networks, 2, 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.cps.ceu.hu/publications/stone/2002/2230
  • Stone, D. (2002b). Using knowledge: The dilemmas of “Bridging research and policy.”. Compare, 32, 285–296.
  • Stone, D. (2007a). Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes. Public Administration. Volume 85, Issue 2. June 2007. Pages 259–278. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
  • Stone, D. (2007b). Market principles, philanthropic ideals, and public service values in international public policy programs. PS - Political Science and Politics, 40(3), 545–551.
  • Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities, and their networks. Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), 19–38.
  • Stone, D. (2009). Private philanthropy or policy transfer? The transnational norms of the Open Society Institute. Policy & Politics, 2(5), 255.
  • Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the global agora. Palgrave Macmillan. London
  • Stone, D. (2014). Knowledge actors and transnational governance: The private-public policy nexus in the Global Agora. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16. doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.887608
  • Stone, D. (2015). The Group of 20 transnational policy community: Governance networks, policy analysis and think tanks. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(4), 793–811.
  • Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2017). Policy analysis & think tanks in comparative perspective. In M. Brans, I. Geva-May, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Handbook on comparative policy analysis. Routledge.
  • Stone, D. (2017). Understanding the transfer of policy failure: bricolage, experimentalism and translation. Policy And Politics, 45(1), 55–70.
  • Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855.
  • Suzuki, H., Cervero, R., & Iuchi, K. (2013). Transforming cities with transit: Urban development. In Urban development series. Retrieved from http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-9745-9#
  • Theodore, N., Peck, J., & Brenner, N. (2009). Urbanismo neoliberal: La ciudad y el imperio de los mercados. Temas Sociales SUR, 66, 1–11. Retrieved from www.sitiosur.cl
  • Wood, A. (2014). Learning through policy tourism: circulating bus rapid transit from south america to south africa. Environment and Planning A, 46(11), 2654–2669.
  • Wood, A. (2015a). The politics of policy circulation: Unpacking the relationship between South African and South American cities in the adoption of Bus Rapid Transit. Antipode, 47(4), 1062–1079.
  • Wood, A. (2015b). Multiple temporalities of policy circulation: Gradual, repetitive and delayed processes of BRT adoption in South African Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(3), 568–580.
  • Wood, A. (2016). Tracing policy movements: Methods for studying learning and policy circulation. Environment and Planning A, 48(2), 391–406.
  • Wright, L., & Hook, W. (2007). Bus Rapid Transit planning guide. ITDP. Retrieved from http://www.itdp.org/index.php/microsite/brt_planning_guide_in_english
  • Zapata, P., & Zapata Campos, M. J. (2015). Unexpected translations in urban policy mobility. The case of the Acahualinca development programme in Managua, Nicaragua. Habitat International, 46, 271–276.