3,543
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Social investment in the knowledge-based economy: new politics and policies

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., & Verdier, T. (2012). Can’t we all be more like Scandinavians? Asymmetric growth and institutions in an interdependent world (No. w18441). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Akkermans, D., Castaldi, C., & Los, B. (2009). Do ‘liberal market economies’ really innovate more radically than ‘coordinated market economies’? Hall and Soskice reconsidered. Research Policy, 38(1), 181–191.
  • Anderson, C. J., & Hecht, J. (2015). Happiness and the welfare state: Decommodification and the political economy of subjective wellbeing. In P. Beramendi, S. Hausermann, H. Kitschelt, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The politics of advanced capitalism. (pp. 357–380). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Armingeon, K., & Bonoli, G. (Eds.). (2007). The politics of post-industrial welfare states: Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.
  • Bell, A., Chetty, R., Jaravel, X., Petkova, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2018). Who becomes an inventor in America? The importance of exposure to innovation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(2), 647–713.
  • Beramendi, P., Häusermann, S., Kitschelt, H., & Kriesi, H. (eds.). (2015). The politics of advanced capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blomqvist, P. (2004). The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy and Administration, 38(2), 139–155.
  • Bonoli, G., Cantillon, B., & Van Lancker, W. (2017). Social Investment and the Matthew effect. In A. Hemerijck (Ed.), The uses of social investment (pp. 66–76). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • Bonoli, G., & Liechti, F. (2018). Good intentions and Matthew effects: Access biases in participation in active labour market policies. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 894–911.
  • Burgoon, B. (2017). Practical pluralism in the empirical study of social investment. In A. Hemerijck (Ed.), The uses of social investment (pp. 161–173). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2015). Skills and inequality: Partisan politics and the political economy of education reforms in western welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Busemeyer, M. R., Garritzmann, J. L., Neimanns, E., & Nezi, R. (2018). Investing in education in Europe: Evidence from a new survey of public opinion. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(1), 34–54.
  • Byrne, D. M., Fernald, J. G., & Reinsdorf, M. B. (2016). Does the United States have a productivity slowdown or a measurement problem? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2016(1), 109–182.
  • Cantillon, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432–449.
  • Choi, Y., Fleckenstein, T., & Lee, S. (2020). Welfare reform and social investment policy in Europe and East Asia. forthcoming. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (eds.). (2011). National adaptations to post-industrial labour markets in Europe. (pp. 333–345). Oxford:: Oxford University Press (Work and Welfare in Europe).
  • Deeming, C., & Smyth, P. (2015). Social investment after neoliberalism: Policy paradigms and political platforms. Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 297–318.
  • Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559.
  • Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 480–495.
  • Emmenegger, P., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., & Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (eds.). (2012). The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2002). A child-centred social investment strategy. In G. Esping-Andersen, D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck, & J. Myles (Eds.), Why we need a new welfare state (pp. 26–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Oxford: Polity.
  • Esping-Andersen, G., Gallie, D., Hemerijck, A., & Myles, J. (eds.). (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Esser, I. (2015). Looking to the nordic? The Swedish social investment model in view of 2030. In C. Chwalisz & P. Diamond (Eds.), The predistribution agenda: Tackling inequality and supporting sustainable growth (pp. 177–190). London and New York: I.B.Tauris.
  • European Commission. (2019). European innovation scoreboard. Brussels. Author.
  • Fairlie, R. W., Kapur, K., & Gates, S. (2011). Is employer-based health insurance a barrier to entrepreneurship? Journal of Health Economics, 30(1), 146–162.
  • Filippetti, A., & Guy, F. (2015). Skills and social insurance: Evidence from the relative persistence of innovation during the financial crisis in Europe. Science & Public Policy, 43(4), 505–517.
  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? University of Oxford. Retrieved from <http://www. oxfordmartin. ox. ac. uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment
  • Garritzmann, J., Häusermann, S., Palier, B., & Zollinger, C. (2017). WoPSI-the world politics of social investment: An international research project to explain variance in social investment agendas and social investment reforms across countries and world regions. LIEPP Working Paper No. 64. Paris: Sciences Po.
  • Garritzmann, J. L., Busemeyer, M. R., & Neimanns, E. (2018). Public demand for social investment: New supporting coalitions for welfare state reform in Western Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 844–861.
  • Giddens, A. (1998). The social investment state. In A. Giddens (Ed.), The third Way: Renewal of social democracy (pp. 99–128). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Gingrich, J. (2011). Making markets in the welfare state. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gingrich, J., & Ansell, B. (2012). Preferences in context: Micro preferences, macro contexts, and the demand for social policy. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1624–1654.
  • Girth, A. M., Hefetz, A., Johnston, J. M., & Warner, M. E. (2012). Outsourcing public service delivery: Management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 887–900.
  • Goldin, C. D., & Katz, L. F. (2008). The race between education and technology. Boston, MA: Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Goos, M., Manning, A., & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2509–2526.
  • Gordon, R. J. (2017). The rise and fall of American growth: The US standard of living since the civil war (Vol. 70). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Greve, B., & Sirovátka, T. (2014). Innovation in social services: The public-private mix in service provision, fiscal policy and employment. Farnham, Surrey, UK: Routledge.
  • Hacker, J. (2015). The promise of predistribution. In C. Chwalisz & P. Diamond (Eds.), The predistribution agenda: Tackling inequality and supporting sustainable growth (pp. xxi–xxx). London and New York: I.B.Tauris.
  • Hacker, J. S. (2011). The institutional foundations of middle-class democracy. Policy Network, 3, 33–37.
  • Hall, P. (2015). Varieties of capitalism. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–15). Wiley Online: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2012). Do better schools lead to more growth? Cognitive skills, economic outcomes, and causation. Journal of Economic Growth, 17(4), 267–321.
  • Häusermann, S., Kurer, T., & Schwander, H. (2016). Sharing the risk? Households, labor market vulnerability, and social policy preferences in Western Europe. The Journal of Politics, 78(4), 1045–1060.
  • Hefetz, A. & M.E. Warner (2012) Contracting or Public Delivery? The Importance of Service, Market, and Management Characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 289–317.
  • Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 171–190.
  • Hemerijck, A. (2017). The uses of social investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Henrekson, M., & Jaevervall, S. (2016). Educational performance in Swedish schools is plummeting – What are the facts? Stockholm: The Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA).
  • Henrekson, M., & Rosenberg, N. (2001). Designing efficient institutions for science-based entrepreneurship: Lesson from the US and Sweden. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 207–231.
  • Hien, J. (2013). Unsecular politics in a secular environment: The case of germany’s christian democratic union family policy. German Politics, 22(4), 441–460.
  • Hobson, B. (ed.). (2014). Worklife balance: The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hopkin, J., Lapuente, V., & Moller, L. (2014). Lower levels of inequality are linked with greater innovation in economies. London School of Economics US Centre. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2014/01/23/lower-levels-of-inequality-are-linked-with-greater-innovation-in-economies/
  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2015). Predistribution and redistribution: Alternative or complementary policies? In C. Chwalisz & P. Diamond (Eds.), The predistribution agenda: Tackling inequality and supporting sustainable growth (pp. 67–78). London and New York: I.B.Tauris.
  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2000). Partisan governance, women’s employment, and the social democratic service state. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 323–342.
  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
  • Huber, E., & Stephens, J. D. (2014). Income inequality and redistribution in post-industrial democracies: Demographic, economic and political determinants 1. Socio-Economic Review, 12(2), 245–267.
  • ILO, OECD, & World Bank. (2014, September 10-11). G20 labour markets: Outlook, key challenges and policy responses (Report prepared for the G20 Labour and Employment Ministerial Meeting. Melbourne. Australia).
  • International Labor Organization (ILO). (2016). Global Wage Report 2016/17: Wage inequality in the workplace. Geneva: ILO
  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2017). IMF fiscal monitor: Tackling inequality. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2009). Distribution and redistribution: The shadow of the nineteenth century. World Politics, 61(3), 438–486.
  • Iversen, T., & Stephens, J. D. (2008). Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4–5), 600–637.
  • Jenson, J. (2009). Lost in translation: The social investment perspective and gender equality. Social Politics, 16(4), 446–483.
  • Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism the social investment perspective in Europe and Latin America. Global Social Policy, 10(1), 59–84.
  • Kitschelt, H., & Rehm, P. (2007). New social risk and political preferences. In K. Armingeon & G. Bonoli (Eds.), The politics of post-industrial welfare states: Adapting post-war social policies to new social risks (pp. 70–100). London and New York: Routledge.
  • Korpi, W., & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries. American Sociological Review, 63(5), 661–687.
  • Künemund, H., Motel-Klingebiel, A., & Kohli, M. (2005). Do intergenerational transfers from elderly parents increase social inequality among their middle-aged children? Evidence from the German aging survey. Journal of Gerontology, 60(1), 30–36.
  • Lane, J.-E. (ed.). (1997). Public sector reform: Rationale, trends and problems. London: Sage Publ.
  • León, M., & Pavolini, E. (2014). ‘Social investment’or back to ‘Familism’: The impact of the economic crisis on family and care policies in Italy and Spain. South European Society & Politics, 19(3), 353–369.
  • Lundvall, B. Å., & Lorenz, E. (2012). Social investment in the globalising learning economy: A European perspective. In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state?: Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 235–257). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Lynch, J. (2006). Age in the welfare state: The origins of social spending on pensioners, workers, and children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • MacLeod, G. A. (1973). Does creativity lead to happiness and more enjoyment of life? Journal of Creative Behavior, 7(4), 227–230.
  • Mahon, R. (2019). Broadening the social investment agenda: The OECD, the World Bank and inclusive growth. Global Social Policy, 19(1–2), 121–138.
  • Marcolin, L., Miroudot, S., & Squicciarini, M. (2016). Routine jobs, employment and technological innovation in global value chains. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2016/01. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Miettinen, R. (2013). Innovation, human capabilities, and democracy: Towards an enabling welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mkandawire, T. (2007). Transformative social policy and innovation in developing countries. The European Journal of Development Research, 19(1), 13–29.
  • Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (eds.). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state?: Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Morgan, K. J. (2012). Promoting social investment through work-family policies: Which nations do it and why? In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state?: Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 153–180). Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Morgan, K. J. (2013). Path shifting of the welfare state: Electoral competition and the expansion of work-family policies in Western Europe. World Politics, 65(1), 73–115.
  • Myles, J. (2017). Three challenges for the social investment strategy: Investing in the future, taxes, and millennials. In A. Hemerijck (Ed.), The uses of social investment (pp. 349–357). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • Nickell, S. (2004). Poverty and worklessness in Britain. The Economic Journal, 114(494), C1–C25.
  • Nolan, B. (2013). What use is ‘social investment’? Journal of European Social Policy, 23(5), 459–468.
  • Nordhaus, W. D. (2008). Baumol’s diseases: A macroeconomic perspective. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 8(1), 1–39.
  • OECD. (2016). The productivity-inclusiveness nexus. Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2018). The future of social protection: What works for non-standard workers? Paris: Author.
  • OECD. (2019a). OECD. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG
  • OECD. (2019b). Pensions at a glance 2019. Paris: Author.
  • Oesch, D. (2013). Occupational change in Europe: How technology and education transform the job structure. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
  • Page, S. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Palier, B., & Thelen, K. (2010). Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 38(1), 119–148.
  • Peng, I. (2014). The social protection floor and the ‘New’ social investment policies in Japan and South Korea. Global Social Policy, 14(3), 389–405.
  • Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2006). The evolution of top incomes: A historical and international perspective. American Economic Review, 96(2), 200–205.
  • Prandini, R., Orlandini, M., & Guerra, A. (2016). Social investment in times of crisis: A quiet revolution or a shaken welfare capitalism (Overview Report). Bologna: INNOSI.
  • Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.
  • Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2019). Who wants what? Redistribution preferences in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Saraceno, C. (2016). Varieties of familialism: Comparing four southern European and East Asian welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(4), 314–326.
  • Seeleib-Kaiser, M., & Fleckenstein, T. (2009). The political economy of occupational family policies: Comparing workplaces in Britain and Germany. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(4), 741–764.
  • Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2012). Shifting the public-private mix: A new dualization of welfare? In P. Emmenegger, S. Haeusermann, B. Palier, & M. Seeleib-Keiser (Eds.), The age of dualization. The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 151–175). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Soete, L. (2018). Destructive creation: Explaining the productivity paradox in the digital age. In M. Neufeind, J. O’Reilly, & F. Ranft (Eds.), Work in the digital age. Challenges of the fourth industrial revolution (pp. 29–46). Policy Network. https://policynetwork.org
  • Souto-Otero, M. (2013). Neo-liberalism and continuing vocational training governance in the UK: An examination of three theoretical accounts. Educational Review, 65(1), 20–35.
  • Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Urban, M., Vandenbroek, M., Lazzari, A., Peeters, J., & van Laere, K. (2011). Competence requirements in early childhood education and care (CoRe). University of East London and University of Ghent. repository.uel.ac.uk
  • Van Kersbergen, K. (1995). Social capitalism: A study of Christian democracy and the welfare state. London: Routledge.
  • Van Slyke, D. M. (2003). The mythology of privatization in contracting for social services. Public Administration Review, 63(3), 296–315.
  • Vanhuysse, P. (2013). Intergenerational justice in aging societies: A cross-national comparison of 29 OECD countries. SSRN. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2309278
  • Weisstanner, D., & Armingeon, K. (2018). How redistributive policies reduce market inequality: Education premiums in 22 OECD countries. Socio-Economic Review, in press. doi:10.1093/ser/mwy018
  • Wollmann, H., Koprić, I., & Marcou, G. (eds.). (2016). Public and social services in Europe. Governance and public management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • World Bank. (2019). Retrieved from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/world-development-indicators
  • Wren, A. (2015). The political economy of the service transition: New political coalitions for predistributive strategies. In C. Chwalisz & P. Diamond (Eds.), The predistribution agenda: Tackling inequality and supporting sustainable growth (pp. 223–234). London and New York: I.B.Tauris.