Pulling things together: regional policy coordination approaches and drivers in Europe

References

• ‘PiS wchodzi w buty marszałków. Cel? Miliony z funduszy europejskich’. (2017). Gazeta Wyborcza 8/8/17.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., Peters, B. G., & Steinebach, Y. (2019). Introducing vertical policy coordination to comparative policy analysis: The missing link between policy production and implementation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(5), 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R. (2007). ‘’Intergovernmental policy management: cooperative practices in federal systems. In M. Pagano & R. Leonardi (Eds.), The dynamics of federalism in national and supranational political systems (Vol. 2007, pp. 248–284). New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (1995). Regional policy and politics in a United Germany: The institutional foundations of continuity. Journal of Regional and Federal Studies, 5, 28–44.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, H., & Taylor, J. (2000). Regional economics and policy (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Begg, I. (2017). EU cohesion policy after Brexit: The economic, social and institutional challenges. Journal of Social Policy, 46(4), 745–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Davies, S., Ferry, M., Gross, F., Kah, S., & McMaster, I. (2010). Regional policy and recovery from the economic crisis: Annual review of regional policy in Europe. 31st Meeting of EoRPA (pp. 1–157). United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Yuill, D. (2007). ‘Regional policy in Western Europe: Taking stock of the shift in paradigm’. In Ruhr-Forschungsinstitut für Innovations- und Strukturpolitik (RUFIS). Bochum: Beiträge zur Ballungsforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed CP, A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. & Jones, B.D. (2009) Agendas and Instability in American Politics (2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A., Clower, T., HAUGHTOW, G., & Maude, A. (2005). Neoliberalism and the institutions for regional development in Australia. Geographical Research, 43(1), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A. (2013). Dimensions and dynamics of federal regimes’. In A. Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and the Varieties of Federalism (pp. 70–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komomicki, T., Zaucha, J., & Świątek, D. (2011). How to strengthen the territorial dimension of ‘Europe 2020ʹ and the EU CP, Report prepared at the request of the Polidh Presidency of the Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N. (2013). ‘Paradoxes of self-coordination in federal systems’ in A. In Benz & J. Broschek (Eds.), Federal dynamics: Continuity, change, and the varieties of federalism (pp. 321–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D. (2008). Organising the political coordination of knowledge and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 35(4), 227–239.
   Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J. L., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. Sage Open, 10(1), 215824401990056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, O. M., & Lægreid, P. (2019). Administrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter? Policy and Society, 38(2), 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, A., & Pasquier, R. (2012). The Impact of European integration on centre/periphery relations: Comparing France and the United Kingdom. Politique Europeenne, 36(1), 160–182.
   Google Scholar
• Cseshi, R. (2017). Horizontal coordination in federal political systems – Non-centralization in the European Union and Canada compared. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(4), 562–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M., & Graziano, P. R. (2016). CP and Europeanisation. In S. Piattoni & L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on CP in the EU (pp. 79–91). Cheltenham/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS). (2010). Local Growth: Realising Every Place’s Potential. Norwich: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cataldo, M., & Monastiriotis, V. (2020). Regional needs, regional targeting and regional growth: An assessment of EU Cohesion Policy in UK regions. Regional Studies, 54(1), 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, A.-M., Marshall, N., Fleming, A., Jakku, E., Gaillard, E., & Howden, M. (2014). The role of networks in transforming Australian agriculture. Nature Climate Change, 4(7), 558–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duranton, G. & Venables, A. (2018) 'Place-Based Policies for Development', Policy Research Working Paper; No. 8410. World Bank, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Sixth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion: Investment for jobs and growth: Promoting development and good governance in EU regions and cities. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M. (2013). Implementing Regional Policy in Poland: A New Era? Europe-Asia Studies, 65(8), 1578–1598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, M. (2019) Pulling Things Together – What Works in Regional Policy Coordination?, paper prepared for the 40th meeting of the EoRPA Regional Policy Research Consortium. Loch Lomondside.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., & Bachtler, J. (2013). Reassessing the concept of policy termination: The case of regional policy in England. Policy Studies, 34(3), 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., & Lenz, R. (2016). ‘How institutions moderate the effectiveness of regional policy: A framework and research agenda’. Investigaciones Regionales:. Journal of Regional Research, 36, 255–277.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, L., & Nerhagen, L. (2019). Regulatory Measurements in Policy Coordinated Practices: The Case of Promoting Renewable Energy and Cleaner Transport in Sweden. Sustainability, MDP, Open Access Journal, 11(6), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iammarino, S., Rodríguez-Pose, A., Storper, M., & Diemer, A. (2020). Falling into the Middle-Income Trap? A Study on the Risks for EU Regions to be Caught in a Middle-Income Trap. Final Report to the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, K., & Volkery, A. (2004). Institutions and instruments for government self regulation: Environmental policy integration in a cross-country Comparison. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 6(3), 291–309.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. J., & Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, M. (2008). Thirty Years of Territorial Politics. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 60–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe (2nd ed.). Cheltenham: Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J. (2007). Reconfiguring the State: Trends in Territorial Governance in European States. Regional and Federal Studies, 4(17).
   Google Scholar
• Marra, M. (2014). What coordination mechanisms work to manage regional development programmes? Insights from Southern Italian regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(3), 254–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, M. (2012). Starting to Untangle the Web of Cooperation, Coordination, and Collaboration: A Framework for Public Managers. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(6), 389–401.
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S. (2005). ‘Understanding policy stability and change. the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945–2003ʹ. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(6), 1060–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E., & Stead, D. (2004). ‘Policy integration: What does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review’. Paper presented at the 2004 Berlin Conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change: Greening of policies—Interlinkages and policy integration. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. (2013). The post-2013 reform of EU CP and the place-based narrative. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(5), 639–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Regional Development, Poland. (2010). Krajowa Strategia Rozwoju regionalnego 2010– 2020: Regiony, Miasta, Obszary Wiejskie (pp. 2010). Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office (NAO). (2016). English Devolution Deals, HC 948 Session 2015-16; Audit Scotland (2020) Scotland’s City Region and Growth Deals, January 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Eckerberg, K. (eds.). (2007). Environmental Policy Integration in Practice: Shaping Institutions for Learning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, P., & Pike, A. (2015). City Deals, Decentralisation and the Governance of Local Infrastructure Funding and Financing in the UK. National Institute Economic Review, 233(1), 14–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2007). Linking Regions and Central Governments: Contracts for Regional Development. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019a). Leveraging Megatrends for Cities and Rural Areas. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019b). Territorial Review of Greece. Policy Note Towards a Renewed Strategy for Regional Policy in Greece. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. (1991). Localism and Centralism in Europe: The Political and Legal Bases of Local Selfgovernment. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, M., Evans, R., Meegan, R., & Karecha, J. (2016). The state of Liverpool city region report: Making the most of devolution. Liverpool: Report, January, University of Liverpool and Liverpool John Moores University.
   Google Scholar
• Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC). (2009) Impact of RDA Spending. Report for DBERR.
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis, L. (2011). Sub-national economic development: Where do we go from here? Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, 4(3), 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, R. (1990). Inheritance Before Choice in Public Policy. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 263–291.
   Google Scholar
• Runhaar, H., Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., & Cottineau, C. (2019). ‘Decentralisation versus territorial inequality: A comparative review of English city region policy discourse’. Urban Science, 3(3), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sługocki, W. (2019). The process of shaping regional policy in Poland. Przegląd Politologiczny, (2), 5–19. doi:10.14746/pp.2019.24.2.1
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. (2014). Conflict as driver of pluricentric coordination’. Planning Theory, 13(2), 152–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomann, E., & Maggetti, M. (2020). Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J. (2013) ‘From Regionalism to Localism in England: Conflict, contradiction, confusion, instability’, presentation to conference on New Regional Governance in Ireland: Perspectives And Challenges, National University of Ireland, 21 January 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2013). Coordinating and Integrating Cross-Sectoral Policies: A Theoretical Approach Paper prepared for presentation at the 7th ECPR General Conference 4-7 September 2013, Bordeaux, France.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trein, P., Biesbroek, R., Bolognesi, T., Cejudo, G. M., Duffy, R., Hustedt, T., & Meyer, I. (2020). Policy coordination and Integration: A Research Agenda. Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.13180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trein, T., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The integration and coordination of public policies: A systematic comparative review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varone, F., Nahrath, S., Aubin, D., & Gerber, J.-D. (2013). Functional regulatory spaces. Policy Sciences, 46(2013), 311–333.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. (2015). From policy paradigm to policy statement: A Way to grasp the role of knowledge in the policymaking process. In J. Hogan & M. Howlett (Eds.), Policy paradigms in theory and practice: Discourses, ideas and anomalies in public policy dynamics (pp. 117–140). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar