Estimation of optimal quantitative parameters of selected input data used in local quasigeoid modelling by the GGI method

References

• Abd-ElmotaalH.A., & KühtreiberN. (2009) An attempt towards an optimum combination of gravity field wavelengths in geoid computation. In: Sideris, M.G., ed. Observing our Changing Earth, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 133.
   Google Scholar
• AlbertellaA., & SansòF. (1997) A compendium of physical geodesy, Rio de Janeiro, September 10–16, 1997, Lecture Notes - International School for the Determination and Use of the Geoid, International Geoid Service, DIIAR – Politecnico di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• BlakelyR.J. (1995) Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ClaessensS.J., FeatherstoneW.E., & BarthelmesF. (2001) Experiments with point-mass gravity field modeling in the Perth region, Western Australia. Geomatics Research Australasia, vol. 75, pp. 53–86.
   Google Scholar
• DuchnowskiR. (2006) The effect of random and systematic errors in gravity data on geoid undulations calculated using FFT. Geodesy and Cartography, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• FeatherstoneW.E., KirbyJ.F., HirtC., FilmerM.S., ClaessensS.J., BrownN.J., HuG., & JohnstonG.M. (2011) The AUSGeoid09 model of the Australian height datum. Journal of Geodesy, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 133–150 DOI 10.1007/s00190-010-0422-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GilA.J., SevillaM.J., & Rodríguez-CaderotG. (1993) Geoid determination in central Spain from gravity and height data. Bulletin Géodésique (1993) vol. 67, pp. 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESC Working Group, GradM., & TiiraT. (2009) The Moho depth map of the European plate. Geophysical Journal International, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 279–29210.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03919.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrzybM., KryńskiJ., & MańkM. (2006) The effect of topography and quality of a digital terrain model on the accuracy of terrain corrections for centimetre quasigeoid modelling. Geodesy and Cartography, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 23–46.
   Google Scholar
• IhdeJ., SchirmerU., StefaniF., & ToeppeF. (1998) Geoid modelling with point masses, Proc Second Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Budapest, pp. 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• KryńskiJ. (2007) Precise quasigeoid modelling in Poland - results and accuracy estimation (in Polish), Instytut Geodezji i Kartografii, monographic series nr 13, Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• LemoineF.G., KenyonS.C., FactorJ.K., TrimmerR.G., PavlisN.K., ChinnD.S., CoxC.M., KloskoS.M., LuthckeS.B., TorrenceM.H., WangY.M., WilliamsonR.G., PavlisE.C., RappR.H., & OlsonT.R. (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt Maryland, 20771 USA, July 1998.
   Google Scholar
• ŁyszkowiczA. (2010) Wyznaczenie przebiegu quasi-geoidy dla obszaru polski metodę kolokacji najmniejszych kwadratów. Technical Sciences, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 147–164.
   Google Scholar
• ŁyszkowiczA. (2012) Geoid in the area of Poland in author's investigations. Technical Sciences, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• MeisslP.Preparation for the numerical evaluation of second order Molodensky-type formulas, Rep. 163, Departament of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• PavlisN.K., HolmesS.A., KenyonS.C., & FactorJ.K. (2012) The development and evaluation of the earth gravitational model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research (Solid Earth), vol. 117, no. B4, pp. 440610.1029/2011JB008916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NagyD. (1966) The gravitational attraction of a right rectangular prism. Geophysics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 362–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NagyD., PappG., & BenedekJ. (2000) The gravitational potential and its derivatives for the prism. Journal of Geodesy, vol. 74, no. 7–8, pp. 552–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PażusR., OsadaE., & OlejnikS. (2002) The levelling geoid 2001 (in Polish), Magazyn Geoinformacyjny Geodeta Nr 5(84), maj 2002.
   Google Scholar
• SjöbergL.E. (2003) A general model for modifying Stokes' Formula and its least-squares solution. Journal of Geodesy, vol. 77, no. 7–8, pp. 459–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrojanowiczM. (2007) Local modelling of quasi-geoid heights on the strength of unreduced gravity and GPS/levelling data, with simultaneous estimation of topographic masses density distribution. Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 35 topic Geodesy and Cartography. http://www.ejpau.media.pl/articles/volume10/issue4/art-35.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TrojanowiczM. (2012a) Local modelling of quasigeoid heights with the use of the gravity inverse method – case study for the area of Poland. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 1, (167) pp. 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TrojanowiczM. (2012b) Local quasigeoid modelling using gravity data inversion technique - analysis of fixed coefficients of density model weighting matrix. Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia, vol. 9, no. 3, (167), Prague, Czech Republic 2012 pp. 269–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanicekP., & KleusbergA. (1987) The Canadian geoid-Stokesian approach. Manuscr. Geod, vol. 12, pp. 86–98.
   Google Scholar
• WongL., & GoreR. (1969) Accuracy of geoid heights from modified Stokes kernels. Geophysical Journal International, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 81–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar