380
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Special feature – managing the dynamics of the New Zealand spatial cadastre

, , , , &

References

  • BallantyneB. (2004) Managing the New Zealand Cadastre After Deformation Events: Applying Grit to a Slippery Slope, Research report prepared for LINZ.
  • BeavanJ., & HainesJ. (2001) Contemporary horizontal velocity and strain rate fields of the Pacific-Australian plate boundary zone through New Zealand. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth (1978–2012), vol. 106, no. B1, pp. 741–770.
  • BeavanJ., MotaghM., FieldingE., DonnellyN., & CollettD. (2012) Fault slip models of the 2010–2011 Canterbury, New Zealand, earthquakes from geodetic data and observations of postseismic ground deformation. New Zealand Journal of Geology & Geophysics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 207–221.
  • BeavanJ., SamsonovS., MotaghM., WallaceL., EllisS., & PalmerN. (2011) The Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: geodetic observations and preliminary source model. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 228–235.
  • BlickG., CrookC., GrantD., & BeavanJ. (2005) Implementation of a semi-dynamic datum for New Zealand. A Window on the Future of Geodesy, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 38–43.
  • BlickG., DonnellyN., & JordanA. (2009) The practical implications and limitations of the introduction of a semi-dynamic datum – a New Zealand case study. Geodetic Reference Frames, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol. 134, pp. 115–120.
  • DonnellyN., & PalmerJ. (2006) Issues with maintaining spatial accuracy in a nationwide digital cadastral network. New Zealand Surveyor, no. 296, pp. 34–39.
  • GrantD.B. (1995) A dynamic datum for a dynamic cadastre. Australian Surveyor, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 22–28.
  • GrantD.B., & PearseM. (1995) Proposal for a Dynamic National Geodetic Datum for New Zealand, Proceedings of IUGG General Assembly, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
  • GrantD.B., & BlickG. (1998) A new geocentric datum for New Zealand. New Zealand Surveyor, no. 288, pp. 40–42.
  • GrantD.B., & CrookC. (2012) Spatial maintenance of the New Zealand cadastre in response to earthquakes, Proceedings of FIG Working Week, Rome, Italy.
  • GrantD.B., SmithM., & ThompsonM. (2012) What happens to the cadastre when the earth moves: legislative and regulatory responses to the earthquakes in Canterbury, New Zealand, Proceedings, International FIG Symposium & Commission 7 Annual Meeting, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • LINZ, Surveyor-General (2010) LINZG65702: Guideline for Rules for Cadastral Survey (Canterbury Earthquake) 2010, LINZ, Wellington.
  • LINZ, Surveyor-General (2012a) LINZS65003: Rules for Cadastral Survey 2010 (Amended 1 November 2012), LINZ, Wellington.
  • LINZ, Surveyor-General (2012b) LINZG65704: Interim Guide to the Amended Rules for Cadastral Survey 2010, LINZ, Wellington.
  • LINZ (2013) NZGD2000 deformation model format version 1.0. Effective 17 June 2013. Available from: http://apps.linz.govt.nz/ftp/geodetic/nzgd2000_deformation_20130801_full.zip. Accessed December 2013.
  • NicklesW.L. (2009) Ground movement and its effect on cadastral boundaries. In: McKay, D.F., ed. Chapter 8 of Land Title Surveys in New Zealand, New Zealand Institute of Surveyors, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • OkadaY. (1985) Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1135–1154.
  • QuigleyM., Van DissenR., LitchfieldN., VillamorP., DuffyB., BarrellD., FurlongK., StahlT., BilderbackE., & NobleD. (2012) Surface rupture during the 2010 Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake: implications for fault rupture dynamics and seismic-hazard analysis. Geology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 55–58.
  • RoweG. (2003) The survey conversion project – making a survey-accurate digital cadastre a reality for New Zealand. New Zealand Surveyor, no. 293, pp. 31–38.
  • SmithM., ThompsonM., & GrantD.B. (2011) Re-establishment of cadastral boundaries following the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes, Proceedings of the Spatial Sciences and Surveying Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Tonkin and Taylor (2012) Canterbury earthquakes 2010 and 2011-Land report as at 29 February 2012. Available from: http://www.eqc.govt.nz/canterbury-earthquakes/land-claims/land-reports/stage-3-land-report. Accessed December 2013.
  • WinefieldR., CrookC., & BeavanJ. (2010) The application of a localised deformation model after an earthquake, Proceedings of XXIV FIG Congress, Sydney, Australia, April 11–16.Available from: http://www.fig.net/srl/.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.