Merger in land data handling, blending of cultures

References

• Bogaerts, T. and Zevenbergen, J., 2001. Cadastral systems – alternatives. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25, 325–337.10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00051-X
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., Martin, S. and Walker, R., 2004. Explicit reforms, implicit theories and public service improvement. Public Management Review, 6, 189–210.10.1080/1471903042000189092
   Google Scholar
• Bronislovas, M., 2010. Country report 2010, Lithuania (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003). http://www.cadastraltemplate.org/lithuania.php (last date of access 20 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.R., 2009. Q Technique, method, and methodology: Comments on Stentor Danielson’s article. Field Methods, 21, 238–241.10.1177/1525822X09332080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çagdas, V. and Stubkjær, E., 2009. Doctoral research on cadastral development. Land Use Policy, 26, 869–889.10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K.S. and Freeman, S.J., 1985. Cultural congruence, strength, and type: Relationships to effectiveness. School of Business Administration: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K.S. and Quinn, R.E., 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Revised ed. Reading, Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, G.R. and Harrison, J.R., 2002. Come together? The organizational dynamics of post-merger cultural integration. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 10, 349–368.10.1016/S1569-190X(02)00090-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S., Lubatkin, M.H., Schweiger, D.M. and Weber, Y., 1992. Cultural differences and shareholder value in related mergers: Linking equity and human capital. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 319–334.10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuppen, E., Breukers, S., Hisschemöller, M. and Bergsma, E., 2010. Q methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 69, 579–591.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielson, S., 2009. Q method and surveys: Three ways to combine Q and R. Field Methods, 21, 219–237.10.1177/1525822X09332082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deal, T.E. and Kennedy, A.A. 1992. Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life.
   Google Scholar
• ELIKOS, E., 2010. Country report: Cyprus ((Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003). Available from: http://www.cadastraltemplate.org/countryreport/Cyprus-14Sept2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ERNST, H., 2001. Corporate culture and innovative performance of the firm. Management of Engineering and Technology, . PICMET’01. Portland International Conference on, 2001. IEEE, 532–535.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G. and Van Exel, J., 2008. Using Q methodology in administrative ethics. Public Integrity, 11, 63–78.10.2753/PIN1099-9922110104
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, P., 2008. Open and closed innovation: Different cultures for different strategies. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S., 1990. Technology, corporate culture, and the insurance industry: The Australian experience. Technology in Society, 12, 11–25.10.1016/0160-791X(90)90026-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D.D. and Sanders, G., 1990. Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 286–316.10.2307/2393392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, I., and S. Åkerblom. 2007. “Primus inter pares” leadership and culture in Sweden. Chapter 3. In Culture and leadership across the world. The GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies, edited by J. S. Chhokar, F. C. Brodbeck and R. J. House. New York: Taylor & Francis, pp. 33–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. and Steudler, D. 1998. Cadastre 2014, A vision for a future cadastral system. FIG working group 1 Comm. 7. FIG Publication no. 61, 48 pages, available at https://www.fig.net/resources/publications/figpub/pub61/Figpub61.pdf (last date of access 20 December 2015).
   Google Scholar
• van der Molen, P., 2010. County Report: Netherlands (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003). Available from: http://www.cadastraltemplate.org/countryreport/Netherlands-7Sep2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Muparari, T.N., 2013. Evaluation of mergers of cadastral systems : A corporate cultural perspective. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente Faculty of Geo-Information and Earth Observation (ITC).
   Google Scholar
• Österberg, T., 2003. Country report: Sweden (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003). Available from: http://www.cadastraltemplate.org/countryreport/Sweden-5Dec2003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, M.A., 2005. Modelling causes of cadastral development – cases in Portugal and Spain during the last two decades. Ph.D. Dissertation. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Stergiou, D. and Airey, D., 2010. Q-methodology and tourism research. Current Issues in Tourism, 14, 311–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steudler, D., Williamson, I., Kaufman, J. and Grant, D., 1997. Benchmarking Cadastral Systems. The Australian Surveyor, 42, 87–106.10.1080/00050344.1997.10558690
   Google Scholar
• Trägårdh, L., 1990. Swedish model or swedish culture? Critical Review, 4, 569–590.10.1080/08913819008459622
   Google Scholar
• Vrakking, W.J., 1985. Revamping organisations through cultural interventions. Journal of management consulting, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S. and Stenner, P., 2005. Doing Q methodology: theory, method and interpretation. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 67–91.10.1191/1478088705qp022oa
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S. and Stenner, P., 2012. Doing Q Methodological Research : Theory, Method and Interpretation. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T., Danielson, S. and Tuler, S., 2009. Using Q method to reveal social perspectives in environmental research. Greenfield MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I.P. and Ting, L., 2001. Land administration and cadastral trends  – a framework for re-engineering. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25, 339–366.10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00053-3
   Google Scholar
• Yomralioglu, T., 2003. Country report: Turkey (Based on the PCGIAP-Cadastral Template 2003). Available from: http://www.cadastraltemplate.org/countryreport/Turkey-3Nov2003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zaheer, S., Schomaker, M. and Genc, M., 2003. Identity Versus Culture in Mergers of Equals. European Management Journal, 21, 185–191.10.1016/S0263-2373(03)00013-6
   Google Scholar
• Zevenbergen, J., 2002. Systems of Land Registration, Aspects and Effects. PhD, Technical University Delft.
   Google Scholar