Object view in spatial system dynamics: a grassland farming example

References

• Ahmad, S. and Simonovic, S.P., 2004. Spatial system dynamics: new approach for simulation of water resources systems. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18, 331–340.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:4(331)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmann, A., 1997. Farm-based modelling of regional structural change: a cellular automata approach. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 24, 85–108.10.1093/erae/24.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendor, T.K. and Kaza, N., 2012. A theory of spatial system archetypes. System Dynamics Review, 28, 109–130.10.1002/sdr.v28.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendor, T.K. and Metcalf, S.S., 2006. The spatial dynamics of invasive species spread. System Dynamics Review, 22, 27–50.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkin, M., 2013. Agent-based modelling, spatial analysis and geosimulation. In: A. Koch and P. Mandl, eds. Modeling social phenomena in spatial context. Münster: LIT, p 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bizimana, C., Nieuwoudt, W.L., and Ferrer, S.R., 2004. Farm size, land fragmentation and economic efficiency in southern Rwanda. Agrekon, 43, 244–262.10.1080/03031853.2004.9523648
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T., et al., 2000. Object-oriented image processing in an integrated GIS/remote sensing environment and perspectives for environmental applications. Environmental information for planning, politics and the public, 2, 555–570.
   Google Scholar
• Bossel, H., 2007. Systems and models. Complexity, dynamics, evolution, sustainability. Norderstedt: Books on Demand.
   Google Scholar
• Buchgraber, K. and Schaumberger, A., 2006. Grünlandbewirtschaftung in Österreich. Online-Fachzeitschrift des Bundesministeriums für Land-und Forstwirtschaft. Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, 2006, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. and Mcdonnell, A., 1998. Principles of geographical information systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couclelis, H., 1992. People manipulate objects (but cultivate fields): beyond the raster-vector debate in GIS. Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Smith, M.J., Goodchild, M.F. and Longley, P.A., 2007. Geospatial analysis: a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques and software tools. Leicester: Troubador Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., Stillwell, J., and See, L., 2012a. LandFragmentS: a new model for measuring land fragmentation. Rome: GIS Algorrithms.
   Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., See, L., and Stillwell, J., 2012b. A spatial multi-criteria model for the evaluation of land redistribution plans. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1 (3), 272–293.10.3390/ijgi1030272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demetriou, D., See, L., and Stillwell, J., 2013. A parcel shape index for use in land consolidation planning. Transactions in GIS, 17, 861–882.10.1111/tgis.2013.17.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijk, T.V., 2003. Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land Use Policy, 20, 149–158.10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, E.W., 1959. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271.10.1007/BF01386390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drăguţ, L. and Eisank, C., 2011. Object representations at multiple scales from digital elevation models. Geomorphology, 129, 183–189.10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., 1978. The effects of changing farm size upon levels of farm fragmentation: a Somerset case study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29, 143–154.10.1111/jage.1978.29.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitzinger, J., 2007. Effects of climate change on production risk in Austrian agriculture and potential adaptation strategies. Ländlicher Raum (Online Fachzeitschrift des BMFLUW), 10, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, B.C., et al., 2009. High resilience in the Yamal-Nenets social–ecological system, West Siberian Arctic, Russia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (52), 22041–22048.10.1073/pnas.0908286106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, T., Nolan, J., and Schoney, R., 2009. An Agent-Based Simulation Model of Structural Change in Canadian Prairie Agriculture, 1960–2000. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 57, 537–554.10.1111/cjag.2009.57.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastélum, J.R., Valdés, J.B., and Stewart, S., 2010. A system dynamics model to evaluate temporary water transfers in the Mexican Conchos Basin. Water Resources Management, 24, 1285–1311.10.1007/s11269-009-9497-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, E., et al., 1993. Economics of structural change in agriculture. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 41, 475–489.10.1111/cjag.1993.41.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gónzalez, X., Marey, M., and Álvarez, C., 2007. Evaluation of productive rural land patterns with joint regard to the size, shape and dispersion of plots. Agricultural Systems, 92 (1-3), 52–62.10.1016/j.agsy.2006.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F., 1993. The state of GIS for environmental problem-solving. Environmental modeling with GIS, 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Happe, K., Kellermann, K., and Balmann, A., 2006. Agent-based analysis of agricultural policies: an illustration of the agricultural policy simulator AgriPoliS, its adaptation and behavior. Ecology and Society, 11, 49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargis, D.H., Bissonette, J.A. and David, J.L., 1997. Understanding measures of landscape pattern. In: J.A. Bissonette, ed. Wildlife and Landscape Ecology. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, M., Couclelis, H., and Clarke, K.C., 2005. The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 369–399.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.12.001
   Google Scholar
• Igbozurike, M.U., 1974. Land tenure relations, social relations and the analysis of spatial discontinuity. Area, 6 (2), 132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, W. and Xu, Z., 2013. A distributed runoff model for the mountainous region of the Heihe River Basin (China) based on the spatial modeling environment (SME) I: model structure and equations. Environmental Earth Sciences, 68, 881–888.10.1007/s12665-012-1793-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S.J., Yufeng, L., and Ahmad, A., 2009. Analysing complex behaviour of hydrological systems through a system dynamics approach. Environmental Modelling & Software, 24, 1363–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R. and Burton, S., 1982. Land fragmentation: notes on a fundamental rural spatial problem. Progress in Human Geography, 6, 475–494.10.1177/030913258200600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauf, S., et al., 2012. Uncovering land-use dynamics driven by human decision-making–A combined model approach using cellular automata and system dynamics. Environmental Modelling & Software, 27, 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, S.A., 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73 (6), 1943–1967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, L., et al., 2009. Impact of farm size and topography on plant and insect diversity of managed grasslands in the Alps. Biological Conservation, 142, 394–403.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, T. and Costanza, R., 1997. An open geographic modeling environment. Simulation, 68, 175–185.
   Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, C. and Hofer, B., 2013. Spatial sensitivity of grassland yields to weather variations in Austria and its implications for the future. Applied Geography, 45, 332–341.10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, C., Peck, A., and Simonovic, S., 2015. Modeling structural change in spatial system dynamics: a Daisyworld example. Environmental Modelling & Software, 65, 30–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D.J., 1988. Representations of geographic space: toward a conceptual synthesis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 375–394.10.1111/j.1467-8306.1988.tb00214.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarnecchia, D.L., 1985. The animal-unit and animal-unit-equivalent concepts in range science. Journal of Range Management, 38 (4), 346–349.10.2307/3899419
   Google Scholar
• Schaumberger, A. 2011. Räumliche Modelle zur Vegetations- und Ertragsdynamik im Wirtschaftsgrünland. Dissertation, Graz University of Technology
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, S., Poirazidis, K., and Wrbka, T., 2008. Towards a core set of landscape metrics for biodiversity assessments: a case study from Dadia National Park, Greece. Ecological Indicators, 8, 502–514.10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmook, G. Jr, 1976. The spontaneous evolution from farming on scattered strips to farming in severalty in Flanders between the sixteenth and twentieth centuries: A quantitative approach to the study of farm fragmentation. In: R.H. Buchanan, R.A. Butlin, and D. McCourt, eds. Fields, Farms and Settlement in Europe. Belfast: Ulster Folk and Transport Museum, 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, A.J., 1964. An index of farm structure with a Nottinghamshire example. Department of Geography University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Austria, 2013. Agrarstrukturerhebung. Vienna: Gesamtergebnisse. Statistics Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglbauer, A. and Weiss, C., 1998. Hofnachfolge: Eine theoretische und empirische Analyse für Oberösterreich. Arbeitspapier: Universität für Bodenkultur, Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R.W. and Huggett, R.J., 1980. Modelling in geography: a mathematical approach. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K.A. 1963. Farm fragmentation in Greece: The problem and its setting. Center of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M.G., 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 171–197.10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131
   Google Scholar
• Uuemaa, E., et al., 2009. Landscape metrics and indices: an overview of their use in landscape research. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 3, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Vincenot, C.E., et al., 2011. Theoretical considerations on the combined use of System Dynamics and individual-based modeling in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 222, 210–218.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, S.J., et al., 2013. Design of an agent-based model to examine population–environment interactions in Nang Rong District, Thailand. Applied Geography, 39, 183–198.10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C.R., 1998. Size, growth, and survival in the upper Austrian farm sector. Small Business Economics, 10, 305–312.10.1023/A:1007972518380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., 2011. Application of system dynamics model and GIS in sustainability assessment of urban residential development.
   Google Scholar
• Zamyatin, A. and Cabral, P., 2011. Advanced spatial metrics analysis in cellular automata land use and cover change modeling. Dyna, 78, 42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, A., Heckelei, T., and Perez Dominguez, I. 2006. Working paper: Literature Review of Approaches to Estimate Structural Change. SEAMLESS: System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling, Linking European Science and Society.
   Google Scholar