Introducing a usability framework to support urban information discovery and analytics

References

• AbranA., KhelifiA., SurynW., & SeffahA. (2003) Usability meanings and interpretations in ISO standards. Software Quality Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AndersenI.-E., & JægerB. (1999) Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 331–340.
   Google Scholar
• AnnoniA., BernardL., FullertonK., de GroofH., KanellopoulosI., MillotM., PeedellS., RaseD., SmitsP., & VanderhaegenM. (2004) Towards a European spatial data infrastructure: the INSPIRE initiative, Proceedings of the 7th international global spatial data infrastructure conference, Bangalore, India, February 2.
   Google Scholar
• BalsamoS., Di MarcoA., InverardiP., & SimeoniM. (2004) Model-based performance prediction in software development: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarthélemyM. (2011) Spatial networks. Physics Reports, vol. 499, no. 1, pp. 1–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BattyM. (2013) The New Science of Cities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• BattyM., ChapmanD., EvansS., HaklayM., KueppersS., ShiodeN., SmithA., & TorrensP.M. (2000) Visualizing the city: communicating urban design to planners and decision-makers.
   Google Scholar
• BudhathokiN.R., BruceB., & Nedovic-BudicZ. (2008) Reconceptualizing the role of the user of spatial data infrastructure. GeoJournal, vol. 72, no. 3-4, pp. 149–160.
   Google Scholar
• ButterworthI., Giles-CortiB., & WhitzmanC. (2013) Perspective 1: setting the scene for the North and West Melbourne data integration and demonstrator projects, Spatial Data Access and Integration to Support Liveability, pp. 11.
   Google Scholar
• CarverS., EvansA., KingstonR., & TurtonI. (2001) Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 907–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChangJ., & BourguetM.-L. (2008) Usability framework for the design and evaluation of multimodal interaction, Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction-Volume 2, British Computer Society.
   Google Scholar
• ChurchmanC.W. (1967) Guest editorial: Wicked problems. JSTOR.
   Google Scholar
• ConfortoE.C., & AmaralD.C. (2010) Evaluating an agile method for planning and controlling innovative projects. Project Management Journal, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 73–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrosslandM., WynneB., & PerkinsW. (1995) Spatial decision support systems: an overview of technology and a test of efficacy. Decision Support Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 219–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DingsøyrT., NerurS., BalijepallyV., & MoeN.B. (2012) A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1213–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DöllnerJ., & HagedornB. (2007) Integrating urban GIS, CAD, and BIM data by servicebased virtual 3D city models. In: Coors, V., Rumor, M., Fendel, E.M., & Zlatanova, S., eds. Urban and Regional Data Management-Annual, pp. 157–160.
   Google Scholar
• FitzgeraldA., HooperN., & CookJ.S. (2013) Implementing open licensing in government open data initiatives: a review of Australian government practice, Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• FonsecaF.T., EgenhoferM.J., DavisC.A.Jr, & BorgesK.A. (2000) Ontologies and knowledge sharing in urban GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 251–272.
   Google Scholar
• GeertmanS., & StillwellJ. (2009) Planning support systems: content, issues and trends, Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods, Springer, Netherlands, pp. 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• GetisA. (2010) Spatial filtering in a regression framework: examples using data on urban crime, regional inequality, and government expenditures, Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis, Springer, Berlin, pp. 191–202.
   Google Scholar
• GibsonD.V., KometskyG., & SmilorR.W. (1992) The Technopolis Phenomenon: Smart Cities, Fast Systems, Global Networks, Rowman & Littlefield, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• HeoJ., HamD.-H., ParkS., SongC., & YoonW.C. (2009) A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchical model of usability factors. Interacting with Computers, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuoM., VernerJ., ZhuL., & BabarM.A. (2004) Software quality and agile methods, Computer Software and Applications Conference, 2004. COMPSAC 2004. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• KingstonR., CarverS., EvansA., & TurtonI. (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• KouaE.L., & KraakM.-J. (2004) A usability framework for the design and evaluation of an exploratory geovisualization environment, Information Visualisation, 2004. IV 2004. Proceedings. Eighth International Conference on, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• McHargI.L., & MumfordL. (1969) Design with Nature, American Museum of Natural History, New York.
   Google Scholar
• MissinghamR. (2008) Access to Australian government information: a decade of change 1997–2007. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NielsenJ. (1994) Usability engineering, Access Online via Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• PettitC.J., KlostermanR.E., Nino-RuizM., WidjajaI., TomkoM., & SinnottR. (2013) S. Geertman and J. Stillwell, The Online What if? Planning Support System in Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development, Springer Publishers, Berlin, pp. 349–362.
   Google Scholar
• PettitC., TomkoM., SinnottR., & StimsonR. (2013) Building an e-Infrastructure to support urban research in Australia: a lens centered view, Surveying and Spatial Sciences Conference 2013.
   Google Scholar
• RinnerC., KeßlerC., & AndrulisS. (2008) The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 386–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RinnerC., & MalczewskiJ. (2002) Web-enabled spatial decision analysis using Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA). Journal of Geographical Systems, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 385–403.
   Google Scholar
• SchaffersH., KomninosN., PallotM., TrousseB., NilssonM., & OliveiraA. (2011) Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation, The Future Internet, Springer, Berlin, pp. 431–446.
   Google Scholar
• SchwaberK. (2004) Agile Project Management with Scrum, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA.
   Google Scholar
• ShackelB. (1991) Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. Human Factors for Informatics Usability, pp. 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• ShahN., AbrahamS., & WrightG. (2012) Open government data study: India.
   Google Scholar
• ShneidermanB., & PlaisantC. (2003) Designing the user Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 4/e (New Edition), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
   Google Scholar
• SidlarC., & RinnerC. (2007) Analyzing the usability of an argumentation map as a participatory spatial decision support tool. URISA Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• SinnottR.O., BaylissC., BromageA., GalangG., GrazioliG., GreenwoodP., MacauleyG., MannixD., MorandiniL., Nino-RuizM., PettitC., TomkoM., SarwarM., StimsonR., VoorsluysW., & WidjajaI. (2014) The Australia urban research gateway, concurrency and computation: practice and experience.
   Google Scholar
• SinnottR.O., GalangG., TomkoM., & StimsonR. (2011) Towards an e-infrastructure for urban research across Australia, E-Science (e-Science), 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• SlocumT., McMasterR., KesslerF., & HowardH. (2008) Thematic Cartography and Geovisualization, Prentice Hall, New York, pp. 576.
   Google Scholar
• SlocumT.A., BlokC., JiangB., KoussoulakouA., MontelloD.R., FuhrmannS., & HedleyN.R. (2001) Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• SpragueR.H.Jr, & CarlsonE.D. (1982) Building Effective Decision Support Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• SteinerF., YoungG., & ZubeE. (1988) Ecological planning: retrospect and prospect. Landscape Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• SteinerF.R. (2002) Human Ecology: Following Nature's Lead, Island Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• SteinerF.R. (2008) The Living Landscape: An Ecological Approach to Landscape Planning, Island Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• StockC., BishopI.D., O'ConnorA.N., ChenT., PettitC.J., & AuramboutJ.-P. (2008) SIEVE: collaborative decision-making in an immersive online environment. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• TatnallA. (2005) Web Portals: The New Gateways to Internet Information and Services, IGI Global, Hershey, PA.
   Google Scholar
• TinatiR., CarrL., HalfordS., & PopeC. (2012) Exploring the impact of adopting open data in the UK government.
   Google Scholar
• TomkoM., BaylissC., GalangG., GreenwoodP., KoetsierG., MannixD., MorandiniL., Nino-RuizM., PettitC., & SarwarM. (2012) The design of a flexible web-based analytical platform for urban research, ACM SIGSPATIAL GIS 2012, ACM.
   Google Scholar
• TownsendA.M. (2013) Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia, W.W. Norton & Company, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• UnitM.C. (2013) State of Australian Cities 2013, Department of Infrastructure and Transport, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• UranO., & JanssenR. (2003) Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 511–526.
   Google Scholar
• Vinagre DíazJ.J., WilbyM.R., Rodríguez GonzálezA.B., & García MuñozJ. (2013) EEOnt: an ontological model for a unified representation of energy efficiency in buildings. Energy and Buildings, vol. 60, pp. 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VonkG., GeertmanS., & SchotP. (2005) Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 909–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZahariasP. (2009) Usability in the context of e-Learning. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 37–59.
   Google Scholar
• ZlatanovaS., & GruberM. (1998) 3D urban GIS on the Web: data structuring and visualization. IAPRS, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 691–699.
   Google Scholar
• ZlatanovaS., & LiJ. (2008) Geospatial Information Technology for Emergency Response, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, London.
   Google Scholar