259
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Semantic definition and matching for implementing national spatial data infrastructures

, &

References

  • ACEGISProject. 2004. Available from: http://plone.itc.nl/agile_old/Conference/greece2004/papers/P-11_Poveda.pdf [Accessed 11 October 2010].
  • Alani, H., Brewster, C., and Shadbolt, N., 2006. Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank. In: The 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 5–9 November 2006 Georgia, USA, Athens, GA, USA, 1–15.
  • Cömert, Ç., 2004. Web Services and National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI). In: XXth ISPRS Congress, Commission 4, 12–23 July 2004, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Cruz, I.F. Sunna, W.G., and Ayloo, K., 2005. Concept level matching of geospatial ontologies. In: GIS Planet of Second Conference and Exhibition on Geographic Information, June 2005, Estoril, Portugal.
  • Ding, L., Pan, R., Finin, T., et al., 2005. Finding and ranking knowledge on the semantic web. In: Y. Gil, E. Motta, V.R. Benjamins, and M.A. Musen, eds. Procedings of the 4th international semantic web conference, volume 3729 of LNCS, 6-10 November 2005 Galway, Ireland: Springer-Verlag GmbH, 156–170.
  • Dolbear, C., Goodwin, J., Mizen, H., et al., 2005. Semantic interoperability between topographic data and a flood defence ontology. Ordnance Survey Technical Report I001.
  • Euzenat, J. and Shvaiko, P., 2007. Ontology Matching. Springer-Verlag Hardcover, ISBN: 978-3-540-49611-3, Berlin Heidelberg (DE).
  • Fernández, T.D. and Fernández, J.L.C., 2008. Towards semantic spatial data infrastructures: a framework for sustainable development. In: Tenth International Conference for Spatial Data Infrastructure, February 25-29 St.Augustine, Trinidad.
  • Gangemi, A. Catenacci, C. Ciaramita, M., et al., 2005. Ontology evaluation and validation: an integrated formal model for the quality diagnostic task, Technical Report. Available from: http://www.loa-cnr.it/Publications.html.
  • Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., and Yatskevich, M., 2004. S-MATCH: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching, Technical report # DIT-04-015. Italy: Trento. February 2004.
  • Giunchiglia, F., Vincenzo, M. Farazi, F., et al., 2009. GEOWordNet: a resource for geo-spatial applications, Technical report # DISI-09-071, Trento, Italy. December 2009.
  • Gómez-Pérez, A., Fernández-López, M., and Corcho, O., 2004. Ontological engineering:with examples from the areas of knowledge management, e-Commerce and the semantic web. 1st ed. London: Springer, 113–157.
  • Guarino, N., 1997. Semantic matching: formal ontological distinctions for information organization, extraction, and integration. In: M.T. Pazienza, ed. Information extraction: a multidisciplinary approach to an emerging information technology. vol 1299. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 139–170.10.1007/3-540-63438-X
  • Ivanova, T., 2010. A semantic ontology alignment method, Conference ICL2010. Hasselt, Belgium, 15–17 September 2010.
  • extJWNL. 2011. Available from: http://extjwnl.sourceforge.net/ [ Accessed 21 October 2012].
  • Kara, G. and Cömert, C., 2011. Semantic data definition for national spatial data infrastructure, congress of geographic information systems, Antalya Culture Center, Antalya, 31 October - 04 November 2011.
  • Kara, G. Ulutaş, D., and Cömert, Ç., 2012. Semantic definition and matching for national spatial data infrastructure. In: INSPIRE Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Klien, E., 2008. Semantic annotation of geographic information, Thesis (PhD). Institute for Geoinformatics. University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Lemmens, R.L.G., 2006. Semantic interoperability of distributed geo – services, Netherlands Geodetic Commission NCG : Publications on Geodesy : New Series 63, ISBN: 90-6132-298-7.
  • Lieberman, J., Singh, R., and Goad, C., 2007. W3C Geospatial ontologies, W3C Incubator Group. Report, 23 October 2007.
  • Lutz, M., Sprado, J., Klien, E., et al., 2009, April. Overcoming semantic heterogeneity in spatial data infrastructures. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (4), 739–752.
  • Nardi, D. and Brachman, J., 2002. An Introduction to description logics. In: F. Baader, et al., eds. The description logic Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 5–44.
  • Nathalie, A., 2009. Schema matching based on attribute values and background ontology, 12th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2009, Leibniz Universitat Hannover, Germany.
  • Partyka, J., Parveen, P., and Khan, L., et al., 2010. Enhanced geographically typed semantic schema matching, WebSemantics:Sci.Serv.AgentsWorldWideWeb(2011), doi:10.1016/j.websem.2010.11.002.
  • Pires, C. E., Souza, D., Pachêco, T., et al., 2009. A semantic-based ontology matching process for PDMS. In: A. Hameurlain and A M. Tjoa (Eds.) Globe 2009, LNCS 5697, © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 124–135.
  • Porzel, R. and Malaka, R., 2004. A task-based approach for ontology evaluation. In: Proc. of ECAI 2004. Workshop on Ontology Learning and Population. Spain: Valencia.
  • Probst, F., 2007. Semantic reference systems for observations and measurements, Thesis (PhD). Institute for Geoinformatics., University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
  • Sabou M., Lopez V., Motta E., et al., 2006. Ontology selection: ontology evaluation on the real semantic web. 15th International World Wide Web Conference’2005, Edinburgh, In Proceedings The 4th International EON Workshop, Evaluation of Ontologies for the Web (EON’2006).
  • Schade, S., 2009. Ontology-Driven Translation of Geospatial Data, PhD Thesis, Institute for GeoInformatics, University of Münster, April 2009, Münster, Germany.
  • Shamdasani, J., Bloodsworth, P., Munir, K., et al., 2011. MedMatch-towards domain specific semantic matching. In: S. Andrews et al. (Eds.) ICCS 2011, LNAI 6828. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 375–382.
  • Shvaiko, P., 2004. A classification of schema-based matching approaches, Technical Report # DIT-04-093. Italy: Trento. August 2004.
  • Uschold, M. and Grüninger, M., 1996. Ontologies: Principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11 (2), 93–155.
  • WordNet. 2010, http://wordnet.princeton.edu/ [Accessed 20 October 2012].

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.