Maximizing grid-on-grid transformation performance with regularized regression techniques for integrating multi-source geospatial data

References

• Abbey, D.A. and Featherstone, W.E., 2020. Comparative review of molodensky–Badekas and Burša–wolf methods for coordinate transformation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 146 (3), 04020010. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdalla, A. and Mustafa, M., 2021. Horizontal displacement of control points using GNSS differential positioning and network adjustment. Measurement, 174, 108965. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.108965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri-Simkooei, A. and Jazaeri, S., 2012. Weighted total least squares formulated by standard least squares theory. Journal of Geodetic Science, 2 (2), 113–124. doi:10.2478/v10156-011-0036-5
   Google Scholar
• Ampatzidis, D. and Melachroinos, S., 2017. The connection of an old geodetic datum with a new one using least squares collocation: the Greek case. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 47 (1), 39–51. doi:10.1515/congeo-2017-0003
   Google Scholar
• Cai, J., 2000. The systematic analysis of the transformation between the German geodetic reference system (DHDN, DHHN) and the ETRF system (DREF91). Earth, Planets and Space, 52 (11), 947–952. doi:10.1186/BF03352310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella, G., et al., 2010. Penalized regression, standard errors, and Bayesian lassos. Bayesian Analysis, 5 (2), 369–411. doi:10.1214/10-BA607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civicioglu, P., 2012. Transforming geocentric cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 229–247. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, P.S., et al., 2021. Integration of multi-source geospatial data from GNSS receivers, terrestrial laser scanners, and unmanned aerial vehicles. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 47 (4), 621–634. doi:10.1080/07038992.2021.1922879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duzan, H. and Shariff, N.S.B.M., 2015. Ridge regression for solving the multicollinearity problem: review of methods and models. Journal of Applied Science, 15 (3), 392–404. doi:10.3923/jas.2015.392.404
   Google Scholar
• Elshambaky, H.T., Kaloop, M.R., and Hu, J.W., 2018. A novel three-direction datum transformation of geodetic coordinates for Egypt using artificial neural network approach. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 11 (6), 1–14. doi:10.1007/s12517-018-3441-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazilova, D., 2017. The review and development of a modern GNSS network and datum in Uzbekistan. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 8 (3), 187–192. doi:10.1016/j.geog.2017.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Fazilova, D., 2022. Uzbekistan’s coordinate system transformation from CS42 to WGS84 using distortion grid model. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 13 (1), 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.geog.2021.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felus, Y.A. and Burtch, R.C., 2009. On symmetrical three-dimensional datum conversion. GPS Solutions, 13 (1), 65–74. doi:10.1007/s10291-008-0100-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, D.B. and Pearse, M. 1995. Proposal for a dynamic national geodetic datum for New Zealand. In: IUGG General Assembly, 2-14 July Boulder, Colorado, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfeld, J.S., 1997. Least squares weighted coordinate transformation formulas and their applications. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 123 (4), 147–161. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(1997)123:4(147)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griol, D. and Molina, J.M., 2016. A framework for improving error detection and correction in spoken dialog systems. Soft Computing, 20 (11), 4229–4241. doi:10.1007/s00500-016-2290-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M., 2008. Proposal for developing the Syrian stereographic projection. Survey Review, 40 (307), 92–101. doi:10.1179/003962608X253547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M., 2021. Evaluation of DEM interpolation techniques for characterizing terrain roughness. Catena, 198, 105072. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.105072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M., 2022. Fit-for-purpose conformal mapping for sustainable land administration in war-ravaged Syria. Heliyon, 8 (5), e09384. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M. and A’kif, M.S., 2019. Evaluation of alternative conformal mapping for geospatial data in Jordan. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 13 (4), 335–344. doi:10.1515/jag-2019-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M., Farghal, A., and Taani, A., 2022. Developing low-cost automated tool for integrating maps with GNSS satellite positioning data. Journal of Geodetic Science, 12 (1), 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, M. and Pradhan, B., 2019. A low-cost spatial tool for transforming feature positions of CAD-based topographic mapping. Geodesy and Cartography, 45 (4), 161–168. doi:10.3846/gac.2019.10322
   Google Scholar
• Habib, A., Yildirim, U., and Habib, M., 2022. Applying kernel principal component analysis for enhanced multivariable regression modeling of rubberized concrete properties. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s13369-022-07435-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwin, S. and Lucieer, A., 2012. Assessing the accuracy of georeferenced point clouds produced via multi-view stereopsis from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery. Remote Sensing, 4 (6), 1573–1599. doi:10.3390/rs4061573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, A.C., et al., 2019. A new era in spatial data recording: low-cost GNSS. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 7 (2), 169–177. doi:10.1017/aap.2018.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerl, A.E. and Kennard, R.W., 1970. Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12 (1), 55–67. doi:10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, V., 2009. Understanding coordinate reference systems, datums and transformations. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 5 (4), 41–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kalu, I., et al., 2022. Estimating the seven transformational parameters between two geodetic datums using the steepest descent algorithm of machine learning. Applied Computing and Geosciences, 14, 100086. doi:10.1016/j.acags.2022.100086
   Google Scholar
• Kohli, A. and Jenni, L., 2008. Transformation of cadastral data between geodetic reference frames using finite element method. In: Proceedings-integrating the generations, FIG working week. Stockholm, Sweden: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG).
   Google Scholar
• Konakoglu, B.E.R.K.A.N.T., Cakır, L., and Gökalp, E., 2016. 2D coordinate transformation using artificial neural networks. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 183. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W1-183-2016
   Google Scholar
• Kourouklis, S. and Paige, C.C., 1981. A constrained least squares approach to the general Gauss-Markov linear model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76 (375), 620–625. doi:10.1080/01621459.1981.10477694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapaine, M., Frančula, N., and Tutek, Ž., 2021. Local linear scale factors in map projections in the direction of coordinate axes. Geospatial Information Science, 24 (4), 630–637. doi:10.1080/10095020.2021.1968321
   Google Scholar
• Li, B., Shen, Y., and Li, W., 2012. The seamless model for three-dimensional datum transformation. Science China Earth Sciences, 55 (12), 2099–2108. doi:10.1007/s11430-012-4418-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahboub, V., 2012. On weighted total least-squares for geodetic transformations. Journal of Geodesy, 86 (5), 359–367. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0524-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdipour, E. and Dadkhah, C., 2014. Automatic fire detection based on soft computing techniques: review from 2000 to 2010. Artificial Intelligence Review, 42 (4), 895–934. doi:10.1007/s10462-012-9345-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maling, D.H., 2013. Coordinate systems and map projections. Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mercan, H.Ü.S.E.Y.İ.N., Akyilmaz, O., and Aydin, C., 2018. Solution of the weighted symmetric similarity transformations based on quaternions. Journal of Geodesy, 92 (10), 1113–1130. doi:10.1007/s00190-017-1104-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogi, S. and Murakami, M., 2000. Construction of the New Japan datum using space geodetic technologies. In R. Rummel, H. Drewes, W. Bosch, and H. Hornik (Eds.), Towards an integrated global geodetic observing system (IGGOS). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 103–105. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-59745-9_16
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M.A. and Bro, R., 2012. A tutorial on the Lasso approach to sparse modeling. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 119, 21–31. doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reit, B.G., 1997. A simple way of introducing a global reference frame in surveying and mapping. Survey Review, 34 (264), 87–90. doi:10.1179/sre.1997.34.264.87
   Google Scholar
• Schaffrin, B. and Felus, Y.A., 2005. On total least-squares adjustment with constraints. In J. T. Freymueller (Ed.), A window on the future of geodesy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 417–421. doi:10.1007/3-540-27432-4_71
   Google Scholar
• Schaffrin, B. and Felus, Y.A., 2008. On the multivariate total least-squares approach to empirical coordinate transformations. Three algorithms. Journal of Geodesy, 82 (6), 373–383. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0186-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahvandi, M.K. and Soja, B., 2022. Inclusion of data uncertainty in machine learning and its application in geodetic data science, with case studies for the prediction of earth orientation parameters and GNSS station coordinate time series. Advances in Space Research, 70 (3), 563–575. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P.D., 1952. Conformal projections in geodesy and cartography. Vol. 4. Germany: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, X., Jin, Y., and Li, L., 2011. An improved weighted total least squares method with applications in linear fitting and coordinate transformation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 137 (4), 120–128. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torge, W. and Müller, J., 2012. Geodesy. Germany: de Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110250008
   Google Scholar
• Varga, M., Grgić, M., and Bašić, T., 2017. Empirical comparison of the geodetic coordinate transformation models: a case study of Croatia. Survey Review, 49 (352), 15–27. doi:10.1080/00396265.2015.1104092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velsink, H., 2018. Testing methods for adjustment models with constraints. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 144 (4), 04018009. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar-Cano, M., Marqués-Mateu, Á., and Jiménez-Martínez, M.J., 2019. Triangulation network of 1929–1944 of the first 1: 500 urban map of València. Survey Review. doi:10.1080/00396265.2018.1564599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincenty, T., 1987. Conformal transformations between dissimilar plane coordinate systems. Surveying and Mapping, 47 (4), 271–274.
   Google Scholar
• Yanalak, M., et al., 2005. New local transformation method: non-sibsonian transformation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 131 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2005)131:1(1)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., 1999. Robust estimation of geodetic datum transformation. Journal of Geodesy, 73 (5), 268–274. doi:10.1007/s001900050243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. and Zhuang, Y., 2010. An improved ant colony optimization algorithm for solving a complex combinatorial optimization problem. Applied Soft Computing, 10 (2), 653–660. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2009.08.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, R.J. and Hwang, H.W., 2006. Coordinate transformation between two geodetic datums of Taiwan by least-squares collocation. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 132 (2), 64–70. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2006)132:2(64)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Zhang, K., and Liu, P., 2016. Total least-squares estimation for 2D affine coordinate transformation with constraints on physical parameters. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 142 (3), 04016009. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar