Capturing Experience: An Autistic Approach to Designing Space

References

• Alexander, C. (2002). The Nature of Order: An Essay on the Art of Building and the Nature of the Universe. Berkeley: Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S. and Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
   Google Scholar
• Coolen, H. (2006). ‘The meaning of dwellings: An ecological perspective’. Housing, Theory & Society, 23(4), 185–201.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed., London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., Maier, A. and Clarkson, P. J. (2008). ‘Representing artefacts as media: Modelling the relationship between designer intent and consumer experience’. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A. (2003). ‘A multilayered model of product emotions’. The Design Journal, 6(2), 4–13.10.2752/146069203789355480
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). ‘Case study’. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 301–316.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (2008). Autism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/actrade/9780199207565.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). ‘The theory of affordances’. In Gibson, J. J. (ed), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hopewell, NJ, USA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Happé, F. (1999). ‘Autism: Cognitive deficit or cognitive style?’. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 216–222.10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01318-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, N. (2002). ‘An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition’. Cognitive Systems Research, 3(3), 289–299.10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00044-X
   Google Scholar
• Koutamanis, A., (2006). ‘Buildings and affordances’. In Gero, J. S. (ed), Design Computing and Cognition ‘06. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 345–364.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R. A. and Fadel, G. M. (2006). ‘Understanding the complexity of design’. In Braha, D., Minai, A. and Bar-Yam, Y. (eds), Complex Engineered Systems. Science Meets Technology. New York, NY, USA: Springer, pp. 122–140.10.1007/3-540-32834-3
   Google Scholar
• Maier, J. R. A. and Fadel, G. M. (2009). ‘An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice’. Design Studies, 30(4), 393–414.10.1016/j.destud.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noens, I. and van Berckelaer-Onnes, I. (2004). ‘Making sense in a fragmentary world’. Autism, 8(2), 197–218.10.1177/1362361304042723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (1999). ‘Affordance, conventions, and design’. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43.10.1145/301153.301168
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2002). ‘Emotion & design: Attractive things work better’. Interactions, 9(4), 36–42.10.1145/543434.543435
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. and Ortony, A. (2006). ‘Designers and users: Two perspectives on emotion and design’. In Bagnara, S. and Smith, G. C. (eds), Theories and Practice in Interaction Design. Human Factors and Ergonomics. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Pullman, M. E. and Gross, M. A. (2004). ‘Ability of experience design elements to elicit emotions and loyalty behaviors’. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 551–578. 10.1111/deci.2004.35.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland. (2007). ‘Dissel 40’. Available at: http://www.angenent.biz/dissel40/ [ accessed 21 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Roland. (2010). ‘Ziep 25’. Available at: http://ziep25.blogspot.com/ [ accessed 21 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Spillers, F. (2004). ‘Emotion as a cognitive artifact and the design implications for products that are perceived as pleasurable’. In Kurtgözü, A. (ed), Cognition. International Conference on Design and Emotion. Ankara, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2010). ‘Doing case study: Abduction not induction, phronesis not theory’. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(7), 575–582.10.1177/1077800410372601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2011a). ‘A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure’. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521.10.1177/1077800411409884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. (2011b). ‘The case: Generalisation, theory and phronesis in case study’. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 21–35.10.1080/03054985.2010.521622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do. Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, L. (1997). ‘The autistic spectrum’. The Lancet, 350(9093), 1761–1766.10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09218-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar