A classification of user experience frameworks for movement-based interaction design

References

• Alben, L. (1996). ‘Quality of experience: Defining the criteria for effective interaction design’. Interactions, 3(3), 11–15.10.1145/235008.235010
   Google Scholar
• Ashlee, V. (2010). ‘With Kinect, Microsoft Aims for a Game Changer’. The New York Times Online.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D., Orzechowski, P., Petreca, B., Watkins, P., Baurley, S., and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). ‘Tactile perceptions of digital textiles: A design research approach’. Paper Presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (2008). ‘Grounded cognition’. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrenshausen, B. G. (2007). ‘Toward a (kin)aesthetic of video gaming: The case of dance dance revolution’. Games and Culture, 2(4), 335–354.10.1177/1555412007310810
   Google Scholar
• Bellotti, V., Back, M., Edwards, W. K., Grinter, R. E., Henderson, A., and Lopes, C. (2002). ‘Making sense of sensing systems: Five questions for designers and researchers’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves.
   Google Scholar
• Benford, S., Gaver, B., Boucher, A., Walker, B., Pennington, S., Schmidt, A., et al. (2005). ‘Expected, sensed, and desired’. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(1), 3–30.10.1145/1057237
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). ‘Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement’. Human Computer Interaction, 28(1), 42–75.
   Google Scholar
• Carney, D. R., Cuddy, A. J. and Yap, A. J. (2010). ‘Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance’. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1363–1368.10.1177/0956797610383437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A. and Hekkert, P. (2007). ‘Framework of product experience’. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B. and Stienstra, M. (2007). ‘Easy doesn’t do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics’. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 657–676.10.1007/s00779-006-0137-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, E., Hansen, T. R. and Lykke-Olesen, A. (2007). ‘Movement-based interaction in camera spaces: a conceptual framework’. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 621–632.10.1007/s00779-006-0134-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogtmann, M. H., Fritsch, J. and Kortbek, K. J. (2008). ‘Kinesthetic interaction: Revealing the bodily potential in interaction design’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Designing for Habitus and Habitat.
   Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K. (2004). ‘Understanding experience in interactive systems’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Forlizzi, J. and Ford, S. (2000). ‘The building blocks of experience: an early framework for interaction designers’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., Bianchi-Berthouze, N. and Meng, H. (2012). ‘What does touch tell us about emotions in touchscreen-based gameplay?’ ACM Transactions on Computer - Human Interaction, 39–70.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, B., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. (1999). ‘Design: Cultural probes’. Interactions, 6(1), 21–29.10.1145/291224.291235
   Google Scholar
• Ghazali, M. and Dix, A. (2005). ‘Visceral interaction’. Paper Presented at the 10th British HCI Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Graves-Petersen, M., Iversen, O. S., Krogh, P. G. and Ludvigsen, M. (2004). ‘Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, H. J., Aung, M. S. H., Romera-Paredes, B., McKeown, G., Curran, W., McLoughlin, C. and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). ‘Laughter type recognition from whole body motion’. IEEE Proceedings of Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. (2004). ‘The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product’. Funology (pp. 31–42). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenzahl, M. and Tractinsky, N. (2006). ‘User experience - A research agenda’. Behaviour and Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.10.1080/01449290500330331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hook, K. (2008). ‘Knowing, communication and experiencing through body and emotion’. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 1(4), 248–259.10.1109/TLT.2009.3
   Google Scholar
• Hummels, C., Overbeeke, K. C. and Klooster, S. (2007). ‘Move to get moved: A search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction’. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 1617–4909.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson Guest, A. (1977). Labanotation The System of Analyzing and Recording Movement (Revised third edition). New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Isbister, K. (2012). ‘How to stop being a Buzzkill: Designing Yamove!, a mobile tech mash-up to truly augment social play. Proceedings of MobileHCI 2012, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Isbister, K., Karlesky, M. and Frye, J. (2012). Scoop! Using Movement to Reduce Math Anxiety and Affect Confidence. Interactivity exhibition at CHI 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. V. (2007). ‘A physical approach to tangible interaction design’. Paper Presented at the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. V. and Stienstra, M. (2007). ‘Making sense: Interactive sculptures as tangible design material’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinsmith, A. and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). ‘Affective body expression perception and recognition: A survey’. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 4, 15–33.10.1109/T-AFFC.2012.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, E. (2008). ‘Designing innovative video games’. In J. Sundbo and P. Darmer (eds), Creating Experiences in the Experience Economy. Edward Elgar. Vol. Services, economy and innovation series, pp. 33–59.
   Google Scholar
• Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T. and Edwards, J. (2007). ‘The feel dimension of technology interaction: Exploring tangibles through movement and touch’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction.
   Google Scholar
• Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., Loke, L. and Edwards, J. (2007). ‘Introduction to the special issue on movement-based interaction’. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 607–608.10.1007/s00779-006-0131-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., and Edwards, J. (2008). ‘Experiential bodily knowing as a design (sens)-ability in interaction design’. Paper Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Design & Semantics of Form & Movement (DeSForM), Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Law, E. L., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A. P. and Kort, J. (2009). Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: A survey approach. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Loke, L. and Robertson, T. (2007). ‘Making strange with the falling body in interactive technology design’. Paper Presented at the Design and Semantics of form and Movement.
   Google Scholar
• Loke, L. and Robertson, T. (2009). ‘Design representations of moving bodies for interactive, motion-sensing spaces’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(4), 394–410.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, A. and Fulton Suri, J. (2001). ‘Supporting users’ creativity: design to induce pleasurable experiences’. Paper Presented at the Conference on Affective Human Factors, London.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. L., Richardson, M. J. and Schmidt, R. C. (2009). ‘Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination’. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 320–339.10.1111/tops.2009.1.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazalek, A. and van den Hoven, E. (2009). ‘Framing tangible interaction frameworks’. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 23(3), 225–235.10.1017/S0890060409000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft. (2012). Kinect for Windows Human Interface Guidelines v1.5.0.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, F., Agamanolis, S., Vetere, F. and Gibbs, M. (2009). ‘Brute force interactions: Leveraging intense physical actions in gaming’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7.
   Google Scholar
• Nijhar, J., Bianchi-Berthouze, N. and Boguslawski, G. (2012). ‘Does movement recognition precision affect the player experience in exertion games?’ Paper Presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN).
   Google Scholar
• Nijholt, A., van Dijk, B. and Reidsma, D. (2008). ‘Design of experience and flow in movement-based interaction’. In D. Hutchison, T. Kanade and J. Kittler (eds), Motion in Games. Berlin: Springer,Vol. 5277, pp. 166–175. 10.1007/978-3-540-89220-5
   Google Scholar
• Riskind, J. H. and Gotay, C. C. (1982). ‘Physical posture: Could it have regulatory or feedback effects on motivation and emotion?’ Motivation and Emotion, 6, 273–298.10.1007/BF00992249
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. (1997). ‘Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied actions’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. (2002). ‘The public availability of actions and artefacts’. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11(3–4), 299–316.10.1023/A:1021214827446
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y. and Muller, H. (2006). ‘A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play’. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(1), 1–14.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, Y., Sharp, H. and Preece, J. (2012). Interaction Design - Beyond Human-Computer Interaction (3rd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, P. R. and Wensveen, S. A. G. (2010). ‘Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design’. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. and G., J. (1974). ‘A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation’. Language, 50, 696–735.10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savva, N., Scarinzi, A. and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2012). ‘Continuous recognition of player’s affective body expression as dynamic quality of aesthetic experience’. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 4(3), 192–212.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977). ‘The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation’. Language, 53, 361–382.10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiphorst, T. (2007). ‘Really, really small: The palpability of the invisible’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, H., Rogers, Y. and Preece, J. (2007). Interaction Design: Beyond Human-computer Interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., Hingston, P. and Masek, M. (2007). ‘Considerations for the design of exergames’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A., Klapper, A., Jia, J., Fidalgo, A., Tajadura-Jimenez, A., Kanakam, N., Bianchi-Berthouze, N., CdeC Williams, A. (2014). ‘Motivating people with chronic pain to do physical activity: Opportunities for technology design’. ACM Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2803–2012.
   Google Scholar
• Stepper, S. and Strack, F. (1993). ‘Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings’. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 211–220.10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thin, A. and Poole, N. (2010). ‘Dance-based exergaming: User experience design implications for maximizing health benefits based on exercise intensity and perceived enjoyment’. In Z. Pan, A. Cheok, W. Müller, X. Zhang and K. Wong (eds), Transactions on Edutainment IV. Berlin: Springer, Vol. 6250, pp. 189–199.10.1007/978-3-642-14484-4
   Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P. and DeSteno, D. (2011). ‘Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion’. Emotion, 11(2), 262–266.10.1037/a0021302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J. and DeSteno, D. (2010). ‘The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability’. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693–695.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veld, E. M. J., van Boxtel, G. J. M. and de Gelder, B. (2014). ‘The body action coding system I: Muscle activations during the perception and expression of emotion’. Social Neuroscience, 9(3), 249–264.10.1080/17470919.2014.890668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, R., Bailly, G. and Müller, J. (2013). ‘StrikeAPose: Revealing mid-air gestures on public displays’. Paper Presented at the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L. and Petty, R. E. (1980). ‘The effects of over head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses’. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 219–230.10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wensveen, S. A. G., Djajadiningrat, J. P. and Overbeeke, C. J. (2004). ‘Interaction frogger: A design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward’. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemke, T. (2003). ‘What’s that thing called embodiment?’ Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1305–1310).
   Google Scholar