Possibility-Driven Spins in the Open Design Community

References

• Bauwens, M. (2005). The Political Economy of Peer Production [ internet], Available at: http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499 [accessed March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M. (2012). Scope, Not Scale [ internet]. Available at: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/03/2012319125340857774.html [accessed March 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Bauwens, M., Mendoza, N. and Iacomella, F. (2012). Synthetic Overview of the Collaborative Economy [ internet]. Available at: http://p2p.coop/files/reports/collaborative-economy-2012.pdf [accessed December 2012].
   Google Scholar
• van der Beek, S. (2012). ‘From Representation to Rhizome: Open Design from a Relational Perspective’. The Design Journal, 15 (4) 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. and Nissenbaum, H. (2006). ‘Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue’. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14 (4) 394–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual Design, Defining Customer-Centered Systems. USA: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• von Busch, O. (2012). ‘Generation Open: Contested Creativity and Capabilities’. The Design Journal, 15 (4) 443–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, I., Bourell, D. and Gibson, I. (2012). ‘Addictive manufacturing: rapid prototype comes of age’. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 18 (4) 255–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of the Network Society, the Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Volume I, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK: Blackwell
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2007). ‘Communication’. Power and Counter-power in the Network Society, International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004). ‘Expertise in design: An overview’. Design Studies, 25, 427–441.10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. and Hassenzahl, M. (2012). ‘Towards Happiness: Possibility-driven Design’ in Zacarias, M. and de Oliveira, J. V. (eds), Human-Computer Interaction: The Agency Perspective, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 396. Springer-Verlag: Berlin; Heidelberg. pp. 3–27.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. and Pohlmeyer, A. (2013). ‘Positive Design: An Introduction to Design for Subjective Well-Being’. International Journal of Design, 7 (3) 5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). ‘Building theories from case study research’. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. L. and Graebner, M. E. (2007). ‘Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges’. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (1), 25–32.10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, M. J. (1985). Conceptual Design for Engineers. London, UK: Design Council.10.1007/978-3-662-11364-6
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J. (2001). ‘‘Producing Communities’ as a Theoretical Challenge’. Proceedings of Theoretical Australian Sociological Association (TASA) 2001 Conference, The University of Sydney, 13–15 December. pp. 1 – 11.
   Google Scholar
• Hague, R., Mansour S. and Saleh, N. (2003). ‘Design opportunities with rapid manufacturing’. Assembly Automation, 23 (4) 346–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., Battarnee, K. and Mattelmäki, T. (eds.) (2003). Empathic Design. Finland: IT press.
   Google Scholar
• Lahti, H., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. and Hakkarainen, K. (2004). ‘Collaboration patterns in computer supported collaborative designing’. Design Studies, 4, 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think, the Design Process Demystified, 4th edn. UK: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattelmäki, T. and Visser, F. S. (2011). Lost in Co-X, Interpretations of Co-Design and Co-Creation. Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research, 31 October - 4 November, Delft, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• McAlexander, J., Schouten, J. and Koenig, H. (2002). ‘Building Brand Community’. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38–54.10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menichinelli, M. (2008). Open P2P Design as Enabling Open P2P Systems [ internet]. Available at http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/massimo-menichinelli-open-p2p-design-as-enabling-open-p2p-systems/2008/11/24. [accessed October 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Mikkonen, T., Vadén, T. and Vainio, N. (2007). ‘The Protestant ethic strikes back: Open source developers and the ethic of capitalism’, First Monday [ internet], 12 (2). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/article/viewArticle/1623/1538, [accessed April 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, J. (2013a). ‘Results from 3D Printing Survey’ [ internet], available at: http://surveys.peerproduction.net/2013/09/3d-printing-survey-2013/ [accessed May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, J. (2013b). ‘Emerging Commons Design Economy’. In Smeds, R. and Irrmann, O. (eds), Co-Create 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-Design in Innovation (pp. 111–122). Helsinki: Aalto University Publication series, Science + Technology 15/2013.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, J. (2013c). ‘Thingiverse - Charted (beta)’ [ internet], available at: http://ossoil.com/thingiverse/index2013-11.html#overview-to-thingiverse-licenses-used [accessed May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen, J. and Vadén T. (2012). 3D Printing Community and Emerging Practices of Peer Production [ internet]. Available at http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4271/3738 [accessed April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Muniz, A. M. and O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). ‘Brand Community’. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 412–432.10.1086/jcr.2001.27.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2006). The Design of Future Things. USA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2011). Living with Complexity. USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. and Draper, S. W. (eds.) (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. NJ, USA, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale.
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. (1972). Design for the Real World, Human Ecology and Social Change [ internet]. Available at http://www.interiorarchitecture.ohiou.edu/ziff/ARTI185/victor%20j.%20papanek%20%20design%20for%20the%20real%20world.pdf [accessed January 2013]
   Google Scholar
• Pullman, M. and Gross, M. (2004). ‘Ability of experience design elements to elicit emotions and loyalty behaviors’, Decision Sciences, 35 (3) 551–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, N., Cheng, R. and Bayerl, P. S. (2013). ‘Synchronous versus asynchronous manipulation of 2D-objects in distributed design collaborations: Implications for the support of distributed team processes’. Design Studies, 34, 406–431.10.1016/j.destud.2012.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. (1999). ‘The cathedral and the bazaar, Knowledge’. Technology & Policy, 12 (3) 23–49.
   Google Scholar
• Redström, J. (2006). ‘Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design’. Design Studies, 27 123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redström, J. (2008). ‘RE: Definitions of use’. Design Studies, 29 410–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RepRap. (2013). RepRap Options [ internet]. Available at: http://www.reprap.org/wiki/RepRap_Options [accessed February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. (2011). The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin, J. (2014). The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative of Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Robles, G. and Gonzáles-Barahona, J. M. (2012). ‘A Comprehensive Study of SW Forks: Dates, Reasons and Outcomes’ in Hammounda, I., Lundell, B., Mikkonen, T., and Scacchi, W. (eds), Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability, pp. 1 – 14. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Roozenburg, N. F. M. and Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals and methods. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2001). ‘On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being’. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. and Simons, G. (2009). A Social Vision for Value Co-creation in Design [ internet]. Available at: http://timreview.ca/node/310 [accessed March 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York, NY: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Verganti, R. (2006). ‘Innovating through design’. Harvard Business Review, December.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verganti, R. (2011). ‘Designing breakthrough products’. Harvard Business Review, October.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. and Lakhani, K. R. (2008). ‘Getting Clear about Communities in Open Innovation’. Industry & Innovation, 15(2), 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. USA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar