Design Thinking and Innovation: Synthesising Concepts of Knowledge Co-creation in Spaces of Professional Development

References

• Adams, K. (2005) Sources of Innovation and Creativity. Washington: National Centre on Education and the Economy/Commission on the Skills of America.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. (2010). Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bechhofer, F. and Paterson, L. (2000). Principles of Research Design in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Best, B. and Thomas, W. (2007). The Creative Teaching and Learning Toolkit. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, B., Cook, J. W. and Steinberg, M. (2011). In Studio: Recipes for Systemic Change. Helsinki: Sitra.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2008). ‘Design thinking’. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. (1992). ‘Wicked problems in design thinking’. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.10.2307/1511637
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M. and Rauth, I. (2014). ‘Design thinking: Exploring values and effects from an innovation capability perspective’. The Design Journal, 17(3), 403–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkland, P. and Scholes, J. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Commission, D. (2013). Restarting Britain 2: Design and Public Services. London: Design Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Corner, C. (2012). ‘In to another world: From creativity to creative learning’. Improving Schools, 15(2), 116–129.10.1177/1365480212450237
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. H. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. and Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering Creativity: A Diagnostic Approach for Higher Education and Organisations. New Jersey: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2010). Design Thinking as a Form of Intelligence, Sydney: Sydney University of Technology/DTRS8.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York, NY: Harper Perennial/Harvard Business School.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ippolito, B. (2014). ‘The importance of design for firms’ competitiveness: A review of the literature’. Technovation, 34(11), 716–730.10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., Moss, P. and Pence, A. (2007). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: languages of evaluation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. M. and Smith, M. (2012). Working in Multi-Professional Contexts: A Practical Guide for Professionals in Children’s Services. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. M., Bizas, N., Farrier, S., Bruce, A., Lau, G., Petrasch, C. and Lange, M. (2011). Embedding Vision. Brussels: CREANOVA Project/EACEA.
   Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D. (2001). Research Design in Social Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council (2005). Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20080821115409/http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/Documents/About%20design/Eleven%20Lessons/PDF%20Eleven%20Lessons_complete_study.pdf [accessed 26 March 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, C. (2011). Re-imagining Workforce Development and Planning for Social Services. Dundee: Scottish Social Services Council.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, C. and Dowling, K. (2012). Learning and Development Exchange: Ayrshire and Dumfries and Galloway: Service Blueprint’. Dundee: Scottish Social Services Council.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, C. and MacBryde, J. (2015) ‘Insights from Scotland’s first design-led programme for SMEs to enhance economic competitiveness and design leadership’. Design for Business: Research Conference Book, Melbourne, Australia, Vol 3.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond de Alvarenga Neto, R. C. and Choo, C. W. (2010). ‘The post nonaka concept of ba: Eclectic roots, evolutionary paths and future advancements’. ASIST 2010 Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• d.school (2015). Available at: http://dschool.stanford.edu/redesigningtheater/the-design-thinking-process/ [accessed: 26 March 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, D. and Martin, R. (2006). ‘Design thinking and how it will change management education: An interview and discussion’. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 512–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir, R., Ozores, T. G. F. and Shwartzberg, Y. (2007). ‘The future center as a catalyzer for innovation ecology in science & technology parks’. Paper for IASP conference, Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (2002). ‘Building theories from case study research’. In Huberman, A. M. and Miles, M. B. (eds), The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 5–36.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1993). The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibility, and the Communitarian Agenda. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Farrier, S., Quinn, K., Bruce, A., Davis, J. M. and Bizas, N. (2011). ‘Supporting ICT situated learning and virtual skills rehearsal in workforce development’. EDEN Annual Conference, Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. and Lawler, J. (2007). ‘Blending existentialist and constructionist approaches in leadership studies: An exploratory account’. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(5), 409–425.
   Google Scholar
• Foth, M. and Axup, J. (2006). ‘Participatory design and action research: Identical twins or synergetic pair?’ Proceedings Participatory Design Conference 2006: Expanding Boundaries in Design 2, Italy: Trento, 93–96.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, N. (2005). ‘A problematic relationship? evidence and practice in the work place’. In Bilson, A. (ed), Evidence Based Practice in Social Work. London: Whitting and Birch, pp. 124–140.
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, G. and Roaf, C. (2008). Multiprofessional Communication: Making Systems Work for Children. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gomm, R. (2004). Social Research Methodology – A Critical Introduction. New York, NY: Palgrave/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hallsworth, M. and Rutter, J. (2013). Making Policy Better: Improving Whitehall’s Core Business. London: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury (2005). Britain Meeting The Global Challenge: Enterprise Fairness and Responsibility. London: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ibáñez, J., Fernandez, I., Arandia, M., Eizagirre, A., Barandiaran, M., and Etxebarria, I. (2010). Discovering Vision: Theoretical Foundations and Practical Solutions in the field of Creative Learning. Brussels: CREANOVA Project/EACEA.
   Google Scholar
• Inns, T. (2013). ‘Theaters for design thinking’. Design Management Review, 24(2), 40–47.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Skoldberg, U., Woodilla, J. and Cetinkaya, M. (2013). ‘Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures’. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146.10.1111/caim.2013.22.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. (2011). ‘Rethinking design thinking: Part 1’. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306.10.2752/175470811X13071166525216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konno, N. (2009). ‘The age of knowledge design: A view for Japan’. Design Management Institute Review, 20(2), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Konno, N. (2012). ‘Organizational knowledge creation and “ba” or shared context in motion’. In M. Schley (eds), Proceedings from the Workplace Strategy Summit, 2012 held at Cornell University. Houston, TX: Maruzen Planet, pp. 44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Konno, N. (2014). ‘An introduction to “purpose engineering”: An essay on “practical wisdom” and innovation’. Kindai Management Review, 2, 52–66.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler, J. and Bilson, A. (2010). Social Work Management and Leadership: Managing Complexity with Creativity. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, T. (ed) (2009). Design Thinking, Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value. New York, NY: Allworth.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (2009). The Design of Business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. and Root, D. (2009). 'Knowledge creation in construction: The SECI model'. In: Dainty, A. (Ed) Proceedings of the 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, Nottingham, 7–9 September 2009, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 749–758.
   Google Scholar
• Melles, G. and Misic, V. (2011). ‘Introducing design thinking to undergraduate students at Swinburn university’. Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 18(1) (69) 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. and Petrie, P. (2002). From Children’s Services to Children’s Spaces. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, S. (2004). Is Symbolic Interactionism the Fifth Paradigm of Leadership?. Melbourne: School of Business, Victoria University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The Process of Social Innovation. Innovations, Spring. Cambridge: MIT
   Google Scholar
• Munroe, E. (2011). The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report A Child-Centred System. London: DOE.
   Google Scholar
• Murty, P., Paulini, M. and Maher, M. L. (2010). Collective Intelligence and Design Thinking, Sydney: Sydney University of Technology/DTRS10
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. (1994). ‘A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation’. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and Konno, N. (1998). ‘The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation’. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.10.2307/41165942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, B. (2011). ‘”Design thinking is a failed experiment. so what’s next?” Fast Company’. Available at: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663558/design-thinking-is-a-failed-experiment-so-whats-next
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2013). Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth and Innovation. Paris:OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding Creativity. Scottsdale: Great Potential.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. (2007). Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2007). Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seddon, J. (2008). Systems Thinking in the Public Sector: The Failure of the Reform Regime - A Manifesto for a Better Way. Axminster: Triarchy.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. London: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, C. (2002). ‘Action research and the practice of design’. Design Issues, 18(1) MIT: 49–61.10.1162/07479360252756287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschimmel, K. (2012). ‘Design thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation.’ In: Proceedings of the XXIII ISPIM Conference: Action for Innovation: Innovating from Experience. Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi, I. (2002). Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Eijnatten, F.M. and Putnik, G.D. (2005). A different view of learning and knowledge creation in collaborative networks. In: Collaborative Networks and their Breeding Environments, Springer, pp. 531–538.
   Google Scholar
• Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven Innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovation what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, H. (2011). Design Thinking Isn’t a Miracle Cure, but Here’s How it Helps [internet]. Available at: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663480/design-thinking-isnt-a-miracle-cure-but-heres-how-it-helps?partner=co_newsletter [accessed 24 March 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar