Enhancing the Design Process with Drama-Related Methods

References

• Alessandrini, A., Rizzo, A., and Rubegni, E. (2009). ‘Drama prototyping for the design of urban interactive systems for children’. In Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Interactive Design and Children, Milan, Como, Italy, 3-5 June 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, J., Burrell, J.M. and Guest, G. (2002). ‘An ethnographic approach to design’. In Jacko, J. and Sears, A. (eds), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 964–986.
   Google Scholar
• Boal, A. (2002). Games for Actors and Non-Actors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, E. and Grunnett, C. (2000). ‘Evoking the future: Drama and props in user centered design’. In Cgerkasky T., Greenbaum J., Mambrey P., Pors J. K. (eds.) In Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference. New York, NY, USA. 28th November-1st December 2000, Palo Alto, CA: CPSR, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brown M., Pinchin J., Blum J., Sharples, S., Shaw, D., Housely, M., Jackson S., Flintham M., Benning K., Blakey, J. (2014). ‘Exploring the relationship between location and behaviour in out of hours hospital care’. HCI International, Crete, 22-27th June, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fleury, A. (2012). ‘Drawing and acting as user experience research tools’. In: Proceedings of the 10th Asia Pacific Conference on Computer Human Interaction. Matsue-city, Shimane, Japan, 28-31 August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Foverskov, M. and Yndigegn, S. L. (2011). ‘Props to evoke ‘The New’ by Staging the everyday into future scenarios’. In Proceedings of Participatory Innovation Conference, 2011. Sønderborg, Denmark, 13 – 15 January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. (2009). ‘Using improvisation to enhance the effectiveness of brainstorming’. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems 2009. Boston, MA, USA, 4-9 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, S., Carroll, J., Murphy, J. and Peck, J. (2002). ‘Using “endowed props” in scenario-based design.’ Working paper, Interaction Design Group, Department of Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Iacucci, G. (2000). Concept Design for Mobile Services and Devices Leveraging on Situatedness and Svensson, L., Snis, U., Sorensen, C., Fagerlind, H., Lindroth, T., Magnusson, M. Ostlund, C. (eds). ‘User Participation’. In Proceedings of the 23rd Information Systems Research Seminar. Langatan, Sweden, Laboratorium for Interaction Technology, University of Trollhattan, Uddevalla 12-15 August 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Iacucci, G., Makela, A., Ranta, M. and Mantyla, M. (2000). ‘Visualising context, mobility and group interaction: Role games to design product concepts for mobile communication’. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 23-26 May 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K., Iacucci, G. and Iacucci, C. (2002). ‘Acting to know: Improving creativity in the design of mobile services by using performances’. In Proceedings of theFourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition, ACM Press, (2002) Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK, 14-16 October 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., and Bevan, N. (2002). ‘User requirements analysis: A review of supporting methods.’ In Hammond, J., Gross, T., Wesson, J. (eds), Usability: Gaining a Competitive Edge IFIP World Computer Congress. Montreal, Canada, 25-29 August 2002. Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers, 133–148.
   Google Scholar
• Mancini, C., Rogers, Y., Bandara, A. K., Coe, T., Jedrzejczyk, L., Joinson, A.N., Price, B. A., Thomas, K. and Nuseibeh, B. (2010). ‘Contravision: Exploring users’ reactions to futuristic technology’. In Proceedings of ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 10-15 April 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mehto, K., Kantola, V., Tiitta, S. and Kankainen, T. (2006). ‘Interacting with user data – Theory and examples of drama and dramaturgy as methods of exploration and evaluation in user-centered design’. Interacting with Computers, 18, 977–995. 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M. and Dickinson, A. (2006). ‘The use of theatre in requirements gathering and usability studies’. Interacting with Computers, 18, 996–1011. 10.1016/j.intcom.2006.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2005). Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. (1953). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. New York: Charles Scribner’s Son.
   Google Scholar
• Salvador, T. and Howells, K. (1998). ‘Focus troupe: Using drama to create common context for new product concept end-user evaluations’. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems. Los Angeles, CA, USA. 18-23 April 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, G., (2003). ‘Perception of human-centred stories and technical descriptions when analyzing and negotiating requirements’. In Proceedings of the IFIP TC13 Interact 2003 Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Stromberg, H., Pirttila, V. and Ikonen, V. (2004) Interactive Scenarios – Building Ubiquitous Computing Concepts in the Spirit of Participatory Design. Tampere, Finland: VTT Information Technology, Sinitaival 6.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. I. and Hargadon, A. (1996). ‘Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685–718. 10.2307/2393872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar