Categorization of Hong Kong Modern Males with Regard to Predictors of Menswear Design Preferences in Terms of Physical and Socio-Psychological Dimensions

References

• Aldrich, W. (1997). Metric Pattern Cutting for Menswear, 3rd ed. London: Bell & Hyman Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bakewell, C., Mitchell, V. and Rothwell, M. (2006). ‘UK Generation Y male fashion consciousness’. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 10(2), 169–180.10.1108/13612020610667487
   Google Scholar
• Brough, D. (2008). ‘Neo-Dandy Wearability’. Master of Arts (Research) Dissertation, Queensland University of Technology Creative I.
   Google Scholar
• Chattaraman, V. and Rudd, N. A. (2006). ‘Preferences for aesthetic attributes in clothing as a function of body image, body cathexis and body size’. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(1), 46–61.10.1177/0887302X0602400104
   Google Scholar
• Connell, L. J. (2003). Body Scan Analysis for Fit Models Based on Body Shape and Posture Analysis (No. S01-AC27). Pennsylvania: National Textile Center.
   Google Scholar
• Conseur, A., Hathcote, J. M. and Kim, S. (2008). ‘Consumer masculinity behavior among college students and its relationship to self-esteem and media significance’. Sex Roles, 58, 549–555.10.1007/s11199-007-9366-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A. B. and Osborne, J. W. (2005). ‘Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis’. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation. 10 (7). Available at: http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. and Dittmar, H. (1995). ‘The functions of clothes and clothing (dis)satisfaction: A gender analysis among British students’. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18(2-3), 237–265.10.1007/BF01016513
   Google Scholar
• Craik, J. (1994). Journal of Consumer Policy, 13(1), 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, H. (2008). Modern Menswear. U.K.: Laurence King.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson, K. (2003). Inside the Fashion Business, 7th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Eckman, M. (1997). ‘Attractiveness of men's suits: The effect of aesthetic attributes and consumer characteristics’. Clothing Textiles Research Journal, 15, 193–202.10.1177/0887302X9701500401
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, T. (1997). Men in the Mirror – Men’s Fashion, Masculinity and Consumer Society. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Engel, J., Blackwell, R. and Miniard, P. (1990). Consumer Behavior, 6th ed. Chicago, IL: The Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, B., Herr, D. and Ford, S. (1997). ‘Black and white female athletes' perceptions of their bodies and garment fit’. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 15(2), 125–128.10.1177/0887302X9701500207
   Google Scholar
• Forsythe, S., Butler, S. and Kim, M. (1991). ‘Fashion adoption: Theory and pragmatics’. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 9(4), 8–15.10.1177/0887302X9100900402
   Google Scholar
• Frith, H. and Gleeson, K. (2004). ‘Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance’. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(1), 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Galilee, J. (2002). ‘Class consumption: Understanding middle-class young men and their fashion choices’. Men and Masculinities, 5(1), 32–52.10.1177/1097184X02005001002
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, R. E. and Emmert, J. (1991). ‘Measuring product category involvement: A multitrait-multimethod study’. Journal of Business Research, 23, 363–371.10.1016/0148-2963(91)90021-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pretence Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D., Best, R. and Coney, K. (1998). Consumer Behaviour – Building a Marketing Strategy, 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M. B. (1986). ‘Aims, concepts, and methods for the differences in aesthetic responses to design features’. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 337–347.10.1086/jcr.1986.13.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2005). ‘Consumer profiles of apparel product involvement and values’. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 9(2), 207–220.10.1108/13612020510599358
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, Y. and Parham, E. (1994). ‘Effects of state of fatness perception on weight conscious women's clothing practices’. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 12(4), 16–21.10.1177/0887302X9401200403
   Google Scholar
• Leung, J. and Taylor, G. (2002). ‘Fashion buying criteria of X consumers in Hong Kong’. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 6(1), 63–76.10.1108/13612020210422473
   Google Scholar
• Li, T., Au, J. and Au, R. (2010). ‘A study of the perfect suit for young men in hong kong in terms of aesthetics, comfort and functionality’. The Design Journal, 13(3), 265–290.10.2752/146069210X12766130824858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, S., Jackson, H., Stanley, M., Kefgen, M. and Touchie-Specht, P. (2003). Individuality Clothing Selection & Personal Appearance (6th edition ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelidou, N. and Dibb, S. (2006). ‘Product involvement: An application in clothing’. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5(5), 442–453.10.1002/(ISSN)1479-1838
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, S. (1992). Have You Got the Look? Masculinity and Shopping Spectacle Cited in Shields, R. (Ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S., Griffith, D. and Adjei, M. (2006). ‘Drivers of local merchant loyalty: Understanding the influence of gender and shopping motives’. Journal of Retailing, 82(3), 177–188.10.1016/j.jretai.2006.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, R. and Heitmeyer, J. (2005). ‘Ethnicity and consumer choice- A study of consumer levels of involvement in Indian ethnic apparel and contemporary American clothing’. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 83–105.10.1108/13612020510586424
   Google Scholar
• Rothschild, M. (1979). ‘Advertising strategies in high and low involvement situations.’ In J. Maloney and B. Silverman (eds.), Attitude Research Plays for High Stakes. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 74–93
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, N., Ashdown, S., Hethorn, J., LaBat, K., & Salusso, C. (2006). Improving pant fit for women 55 and older through exploration of two pant shapes. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 24(2), 147-160.
   Google Scholar
• Sproles, G. B. (1979). Fashion: Consumer Behavior Toward Dress. MN: Minneapolis, Burgess.
   Google Scholar
• Sproles, G. B. (1981). ‘The role of aesthetics in fashion-oriented consumer behavior.’ In In Perspectives of Fashion. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess, pp. 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Sproles, G. B. and Burns, L.D. (1994). Changing Appearance – Understanding Dress in Contemporary Society. New York, NY: Fairchild Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tiggemann, M. and Lacey, C. (2009). ‘Shopping for clothes: Body satisfaction, appearance investment, and functions of clothing among female shoppers’. Body Image, 6, 285–291.10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, I., Summers, T. and Belleau, B. (2001). ‘Men’s shopping satisfaction and store preferences’. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8, 205–212.10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00024-2
   Google Scholar
• Tselepis, T. and De Klerk, H. (2004). ‘Early adolescent girls’ expectations about the fit of clothes: A conceptual framework’. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 32, 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Tungate, M. (2008). Fashion Brands, Branding Style from Armani to Zara, 2nd ed. U.K.: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Woodruffe-Burton, H. (1998). ‘Private desires, public display’. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 26(8), 301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, S. (2003). ‘Design elements and consumer characteristics relating to design preferences of working females’. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 21(2), 49–62.10.1177/0887302X0302100201
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. (1985). ‘Measuring the involvement construct’. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352.10.1086/jcr.1985.12.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar