Exploring Product/Part Longevity in Open Design of Small Kitchen Appliances

References

• Archer, Bruce. 1995. “The Nature of Research.” CoDesign : 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bakırlıoğlu, Yekta, and Cindy Kohtala. 2019. “Framing Open Design through Theoretical Concepts and Practical Applications: A Systematic Literature Review.” Human–Computer Interaction 34 (5–6): 389–432. doi:10.1080/07370024.2019.1574225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisseau, Étienne, Jean-François Omhover, and Carole Bouchard. 2018. “Open-Design: A State of the Art Review.” Design Science 4: e3. doi:10.1017/dsj.2017.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonvoisin, Jérémy. 2017. “Limits of Ecodesign: The Case for Open Source Product Development.” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 10 (4–5): 198–206. doi:10.1080/19397038.2017.1317875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, Jonathan. 2005. Emotionally Durable Design: Objects, Experiences, and Empathy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Tim. 2010. “The Significance of Product Longevity.” In Longer Lasting Products: Alternatives to the Throwaway Society edited by Tim Cooper, 3–38. Surrey: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 1999. “Editorial.” Design Studies 19 (1): 2–3. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(95)90004-Y.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, L., and P. Atkinson. 2014. “Closing in on Open Design.” The Design Journal 17 (3): 361–377. doi:10.2752/175630614X13982745782920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Couvreur, Lieven, and Richard Goossens. 2011. “Design for (Every)One: Co-Creation as a Bridge between Universal Design and Rehabilitation Engineering.” CoDesign 7 (2): 107–121. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.609890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğan, Çağla, and Stuart Walker. 2008. “Localization and the Design and Production of Sustainable Products.” International Journal of Product Development 6 (3/4): 276–290. doi:10.1504/IJPD.2008.020396.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, Katja, Sabine Hielscher, and Timothy Merritt. 2016. “Making Things in Fab Labs: A Case Study on Sustainability and co-Creation.” Digital Creativity 27 (2): 113–131. doi:10.1080/14626268.2015.1135809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, Felipe. 2015. Repair culture. http://efeefe.no-ip.org/livro/repair-culture
   Google Scholar
• Frayling, Christopher. 1993. “Research in Art and Design.” Royal College of Art Research Papers 1 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Frens, Joep. 2007. “Research through Design: A Camera Case Study.” In Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects, edited by Ralf Michel, 135–157. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, William. 2012. “What Should we Expect from Research through Design?” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 12, Austin, Texas, USA, 937–946.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, Danny, and Mithra Zahedi. 2014. “Aspects of Research through Design.” Proceedings of DRS 2014: Design’s Big Debates 1: 1667–1680.
   Google Scholar
• Hennesey, James, and Victor Papanek. 1973. Nomadic Furniture. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, Lara, StevenJ. Jackson, DanielaK. Rosner, SyedIshtiaque Ahmed, Meg Young, and Laewoo Kang. 2016. “Values in Repair.” Proceedings of the CHI 2016 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, ACM, 1403–1414. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858470.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Bunnie. 2014. “From Gongkai to Open Source,” December 29. https://www.bunniestudios.com/blog/?p=4297
   Google Scholar
• Kohtala, Cindy. 2017. “Making “Making” Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology.” The Design Journal 20 (3): 375–394. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1261504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakis, Vasilis, Michail Fountouklis, and Wolfgang Drechsler. 2013. “Peer Production and Desktop Manufacturing: The Case of the Helix_T Wind Turbine Project.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 38 (6): 773–800. doi:10.1177/0162243913493676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostakis, Vasilis, Vasilis Niaros, George Dafermos, and Michel Bauwens. 2015. “Design Global, Manufacture Local: Exploring the Contours of an Emerging Productive Model.” Futures 73: 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindtner, Silvia. 2015. “Hacking with Chinese Characteristics: The Promises of the Maker Movement against China’s Manufacturing Culture.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (5): 854–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofthouse, Vicky, and Sharon Prendeville. 2018. “Human-Centred Design of Products and Services for the Circular Economy – a Review.” The Design Journal 21 (4): 451–476. doi:10.1080/14606925.2018.1468169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur Foundation, Ellen. 2012. Towards the Circular Economy Vol.1: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/publications/Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation-Towards-the-Circular-Economy-vol.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maldini, Irene. 2016. “Attachment, Durability and the Environmental Impact of Digital DIY.” The Design Journal 19 (1): 141–157. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1085213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinen, Tiina, Teemu Mikkonen, Vesa Tienvieri, and Tere Vadén. 2011. “Community Created Open Source Hardware: A Case Study of “eCars - Now!” First Monday 16 (5). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3357/2951. doi:10.5210/fm.v16i5.3357.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Marttila, Sanna, and Andrea Botero. 2013. “The ‘Openness Turn’ in co-Design: From Usability, Sociability and Designability towards Openness.” Proceedings of CO-CREATE 2013: The Boundary-Crossing Conference on Co-Design in Innovation, Espoo, Finland, June 16–19, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mugge, Ruth, Jan P. L. Schoormans, and Hendrik N. J. Schifferstein. 2009. “Incorporating Consumers in the Design of Their Own Products: The Dimensions of Product Personalization.” CoDesign 5 (2): 79–97. doi:10.1080/15710880802666416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostuzzi, Francesca, Peter Conradie, Lieven de Couvreur, Jan Detand, and Jelle Saldien. 2016. “The Role of Reappropriation in Open Design: A Case Study on How Openness in Higher Education for Industrial Design Engineering Can Trigger Global Discussions on the Theme of Urban Gardening.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 17 (4): 121–144. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i4.2543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozan, Ezgi, and Çağla Doğan. 2017. “Exploration of the Ways of Empowering People in the Design Process through Product Personalization.” In Product Lifetimes and the Environment, edited by C. Bakker and R. Mugge, 334–339. Delft, NL: Delft University of Technology and IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Özkil, Ali Gürcan. 2017. “Collective Design in 3D Printing: A Large Scale Empirical Study of Designs, Designers and Evolution.” Design Studies 51: 66–89. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, JoshuaM, and Usman Mushtaq. 2009. “Overcoming Technical Constraints for Obtaining Sustainable Development with Open Source Appropriate Technology.” Proceedings of TIC-STH 2009 IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity, 814–820, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Quilley, Stephen, Jason Hawreliak, and Kaitlin Kish. 2016. “Finding an Alternative Route: Towards Open, Eco-Cyclical, and Distributed Production.” Journal of Peer Production 9. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-9-alternative-internets/peer-reviewed-papers/finding-an-alternate-route-towards-open-eco-cyclical-and-distributed-production/
   Google Scholar
• Raasch, Christina, Cornelius Herstatt, and Kerstin Balka. 2009. “On the Open Design of Tangible Goods.” R&D Management 39 (4): 382–393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00567.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, Jose. 2017. “Cosmo-Localization and Leadership for the Future.” Journal of Futures Studies 21 (4): 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlich, Tobias, Sonja Buxbaum-Conradi, Sissy-Ve Basmer-Birkenfeld, Manuel Moritz, Pascal Krenz, BabsileDaniel Osunyomi, JensP. Wulfsberg, and Susanne Heubischl. 2016. “OpenLabs – open source microfactories enhancing the FabLab Idea.” Proceedings of HICSS 2016 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, 707–715.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Mark. 2016. “Pre-Hacked: Open Design and the Democratisation of Product Development.” New Media & Society 18 (4): 653–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Tamminen, Pia, and Jarkko Moilanen. 2016. “Possibility-Driven Spins in the Open Design Community.” The Design Journal 19 (1): 47–67. doi:10.1080/14606925.2015.1064266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thackara, John. 2011. “Into the Open.” In Open Design Now, edited by Bas van Abel, Roel Klaassen, Lucas Evers, and Peter Troxler, 42–45. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, James, Sharon Baurley, Robert Phillips, Paul Smith, Edwin Foote, and Sarah Silve. 2014. “Open Design: Contributions, Solutions, Processes and Projects.” The Design Journal 17 (4): 538–559. doi:10.2752/175630614X14056185480069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troxler, Peter. 2014. Fab Labs forked: A grassroots insurgency inside the next industrial revolution. Journal of Peer Production 5. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/editorial-section/fab-labs-forked-a-grassrootsinsurgency-inside-the-next-industrial-revolution/
   Google Scholar
• van Abel, Bas, Roel Klaassen, Lucas Evers, and Peter Troxler. 2011. Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Stuart. 2010. “Temporal Objects – Design, Change and Sustainability.” Sustainability 2 (3): 812–832. doi:10.3390/su2030812.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Stuart. 2011. The Spirit of Design: Objects, Environment, and Meaning. Washington D.C.: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar