An Investigation into the Product Attachment between Athletes and Their Sports Equipment

References

• Allen, I., and C. Seaman. 2007. “Likert Scales and Data Analyses.” Quality Progress 40 (7): 64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Beedie, C. 2007. “Placebo Effects in Competitive Sport: Qualitative Data.” Journal of Sports Science & Medicine 6 (1): 21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, N., and A. L. Stephenson. 2014. “Variation in Motivations by Running Ability: Using the Theory of Reasoned Action to Predict Attitudes about Running 5K Races.” Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events 6 (3): 231–247. doi:10.1080/19407963.2014.933227.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, H. N., and D. A. Boone. 2012. “Analyzing Likert Data.” Journal of Extension 50 (2): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Bredemeier, Brenda Jo., and David L. Shields. 1986. “Moral Growth among Athletes and Nonathletes: A Comparative Analysis.” The Journal of Genetic Psychology 147 (1): 7–18. doi:10.1080/00221325.1986.9914475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croasmun, J., and L. Ostrom. 2011. “Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences.” Journal of Adult Education 40 (1): 19–22.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, B. 2020. “An Investigation into the Relationship between Paracycling Athletes and Their Prosthetics Technology: A Proposed Design Framework.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology15 (2): 166–167. doi:10.1080/17483107.2018.1549275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, B., 2015. “The Controversy of Sports Technology: A Systematic Review.” SpringerPlus 4 (1): 524. doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1331-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyer, B., H. Hassani, and M. Shadi. 2016. “The Analysis and Forecasting of Male Cycling Time Trial Records Established within England and Wales.” Journal of Sports Sciences 34 (13): 1222–1230. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1105378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and A. Mathur. 2018. “The Value of Online Surveys: A Look Back and a Look Ahead.” Internet Research 28 (4): 854–887. doi:10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisner, I. M., J. Grossbard, S. Tollison, and M. E. Larimer. 2012. “Differences between Athletes and Non-Athletes in Risk and Health Behaviors in Graduating High School Seniors.” Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse 21 (2): 156–166. doi:10.1080/1067828X.2012.662433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gliem, J., and R. Gliem. 2003. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-type Scales. Midwest Research-to-Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
   Google Scholar
• Heazlewood, I., J. J Walsh, M. Climstein, K. Adams, T. Sevene, M. DeBeliso, and J. J Kettunen. 2016. “Participant Motivation: A Comparison of Male and Female Athletes Competing at the 2009 World Masters Games.” In Applied Psychology: Proceedings of the 2015 Asian Congress of Applied Psychology (ACAP 2015) (pp. 291–297). doi:10.1142/9789814723398_0016.
   Google Scholar
• Holowchak, M. 2002. “Ergogenic Aids and the Limits of Human Performance in Sport: Ethical Issues, Aesthetic Considerations.” Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 29 (1): 75–86. doi:10.1080/00948705.2002.9714624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeukendrup, A., N. Craig, and J. Hawley. 2000. “The Bioenergetics of World Class Cycling.” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 3 (4): 414–433. doi:10.1016/S1440-2440(00)80008-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleine, S., and S. Baker. 2004. “An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment.” Academy of Marketing Science Review 1 (1): 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., C. Perry, C. Horsely, and L. Roche. 1995. “Age and Gender Effects in Physical Self-Concepts for Adolescent Elite Athletes and Nonathletes: A Multicohort-Multioccasion Design.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 17 (1): 70–83. doi:10.1123/jsep.17.1.70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., R. Eklund, and C. Mushett. 1997. “Factor Structure of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale with Athletes with Disabilities.” Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 14 (1): 74–82. doi:10.1123/apaq.14.1.74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, M., M. Trudeau, S. Nigg, and B. Nigg. 2016. “Increased Athletic Performance in Lighter Basketball Shoes: Shoe or Psychology Effect?” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance 11 (1): 74–79. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2014-0538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R., J. Schoormans, and H. Schifferstein. 2009. “Emotional Bonding with Personalised Products.” Journal of Engineering Design 20 (5): 467–476. doi:10.1080/09544820802698550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mugge, R., H. Schifferstein, and J. Schoormans. 2010. “Product Attachment and Satisfaction: Understanding Consumers' Post-Purchase Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 27 (3): 271–282. doi:10.1108/07363761011038347.
   Google Scholar
• Mugge, R., H. Schifferstein, and J. Schoormans. 2005. “A Longitudinal Study of Product Attachment and its Determinants.” ACR European Advances.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. 2013. “Likert Data: What to Use, Parametric or Non-Parametric?” International Journal of Business and Social Science 4 (11): 258–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. “Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of statistics.” Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 15 (5): 625–632. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richins, M. L. 1994. “Valuing Things: The Public and Private Meanings of Possessions.” Journal of Consumer Research 21 (3): 504–521. doi:10.1086/209414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E., and P. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” Codesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Schifferstein, H., and E. Zwartkruis-Pelgrim. 2008. “Consumer-Product Attachment: Measurement and Design Implications.” International Journal of Design 2 (3): 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, C., Jones, R. and Leaney, P., 2008. Improved tennis ball design: incorporating mechanical and psychological influences. Journal of Engineering Design 19 (3): 269–284.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., and R. Dennick. 2011. “Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha.” International Journal of Medical Education 2: 53–55. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompsett, B., Harland, A. and Roberts, J., 2016. “Investigating the relationship between physical properties of a football and player perceptions.” Procedia Engineering 147: 519–525.
   Google Scholar