Digital Cultural Heritage Design Practice: A Conceptual Framework

References

• Avram, Gabriela, Luigina Ciolfi, Simona Spedale, Deborah Roberts, and Daniela Petrelli. 2019. “Co-Design Goes Large.” Interactions 26 (5): 58–63. doi:10.1145/3348793.
   Google Scholar
• Blomkvist, Johan, and Fabian Segelström. 2014. “Benefits of External Representations in Service Design: A Distributed Cognition Perspective.” The Design Journal 17 (3): 331–346. doi:10.2752/175630614X13982745782849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Tony, Hannah Fox, and Suzanne MacLeod. 2018. “Placing Citizens at the Heart of Museum Development.” In The Future of Museum and Gallery Design: Purpose, Process, Perception, edited by S. MacLeod, T. Austin, J. Hale, and O. H. Hing-Kay, 120–135. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carlile, Paul R. 2004. “Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge across Boundaries.” Organization Science 15 (5): 555–568. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouch, Christopher, and Jane Pearce. 2013. Doing Research in Design. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, Erica, and Cédric Masclet. 2013. “A Framework for the Study of External Representations in Collaborative Design Settings.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71 (1): 46–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2008. “Design Research: A Revolution-Waiting-to-Happen.” Design Studies 29 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2015. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2016. “Design Practice and Design Research: Finally Together?” Paper Presented at the Design Research Society International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö, Reijo Miettinen, and Raija-Leena Punamäki. 1999. Perspectives on Activity Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö. 2000. “Activity Theory as a Framework for Analyzing and Redesigning Work.” Ergonomics 43 (7): 960–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engeström, Yrjö. 2009. “The Future of Activity Theory: A Rough Draft.” In Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory, 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Ewenstein, Boris, and Jennifer Whyte. 2009. “Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations Asepistemic Objects.” Organization Studies 30 (1): 07–30. doi:10.1177/0170840608083014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Hannah. 2015. “Daring Greatly through Human-Centered Design: An Interview with Hannah Fox of Derby Museums.” In Design Thinking for Museums, edited by Dana Mitroff Silvers. Accessed 23 February 2021. https://designthinkingformuseums.net/2015/08/10/human-centered-design-at-derby-museums/
   Google Scholar
• French, Ariana. 2016. “Service Design Thinking for Museums: Technology in Contexts.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting for Museums and the Web, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, Geraldine, and Helene Hembrooke. 2004. Activity-Centered Design: An Ecological Approach to Designing Smart Tools and Usable Systems, 144 pp. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giacomin, Joseph. 2014. “What is Human Centred Design?” The Design Journal 17 (4): 606–623. doi:10.2752/175630614X14056185480186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding, Viv, and Wayne Modest. 2013. Museums and Communities: Curators, Collections and Collaboration: A&C Black. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Janes, Robert R., and Richard Sandell. 2019. Museum Activism. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, Guy. 2007. “Design Practice within a Theory of Practice.” Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal—Annual Review 1 (2): 43–50. doi:10.18848/1833-1874/CGP/v01i02/57881.
   Google Scholar
• Julier, Guy. 2013. The Culture of Design. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Junginger, Sabine. 2005. “A Different Role for Human-Centered Design within the Organization.” In 6th Annual Conference of the European Academy of Design, Bremen.
   Google Scholar
• Junginger, Sabine. 2008. “Product Development as a Vehicle for Organizational Change.” Design Issues 24 (1): 26–35. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.1.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, Victor, and Bonnie Nardi. 2012. “Activity Theory in HCI: Fundamentals and Reflections.” Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 5 (1): 1–105. doi:10.2200/S00413ED1V01Y201203HCI013.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy, and Park End Street. 2009. “Beyond Design Thinking: Design-as-Practice and Designs-in-Practice.” Paper Presented at the CRESC Conference, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. 2011. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part I.” Design and Culture 3 (3): 285–306. doi:10.2752/175470811X13071166525216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy. 2012. “Rethinking Design Thinking: Part II.” Design and Culture 4 (2): 129–148. doi:10.2752/175470812X13281948975413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsh, David. 2010. “Thinking with External Representations.” AI & SOCIETY 25 (4): 441–454. doi:10.1007/s00146-010-0272-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kuijer, Lenneke, and Annelise M. De Jong. 2011. “Practice Theory and Human-Centered Design: A Sustainable Bathing Example.” Nordes (4).
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, Kari, and Liam J. Bannon. 2014. “The Turn to Practice in HCI: Towards a Research Agenda.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Charlotte P. 2007. “Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work.” Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 16 (3): 307–339. doi:10.1007/s10606-007-9044-5.
   Google Scholar
• Leont’ev, Alekseĭ Nikolaevich. 1978. Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, Marco. 2015. “Prototyping Practices Supporting Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Digital Media Design for Museums.” Museum Management and Curatorship 30 (5): 394–426. doi:10.1080/09647775.2015.1086667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miettinen, Reijo, Sami Paavola, and Pasi Pohjola. 2012. “From Habituality to Change: Contribution of Activity Theory and Pragmatism to Practice Theories.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (3): 345–360. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.2012.00495.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitroff Silvers, D., M. Rogers, and M. Wilson. 2013. “Design Thinking for Visitor Engagement: Tackling One Museum's Big Challenge through Human-Centered Design.” Paper Presented at the Museums and the Web. Accessed 25 February 2021. https://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/design-thinking/
   Google Scholar
• Mitroff Silvers, Dana. 2017. “How Might We Embed Design Thinking into a Museum?” In The Museum Blog Book, edited by Graeme Farnell. Edinburgh: MuseumsEtc.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, Davide. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Jane K. 2017. “Museum Communication and Storytelling: Articulating Understandings within the Museum Structure.” Museum Management and Curatorship 32 (5): 440–455. doi:10.1080/09647775.2017.1284019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, Ikujirō, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, xii, 284 p. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, Ikujiro, Ryoko Toyama, and Noboru Konno. 2000. “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation.” Long Range Planning 33 (1): 5–34. doi:10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, Linda, and Rainey Tisdale. 2016. Creativity in Museum Practice. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe, Dennis, Derek Thomson, and Andrew Dainty. 2015. “Evaluating the Design of Hospitals within a Practice Order Network.” Construction Management and Economics 33 (5–6): 415–427. doi:10.1080/01446193.2015.1072639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, Anne Rørbaek. 2015. Co-Designing Digital Museum Communication: An Exploration of Digital Museum Communication as It Emerges in Collaborative Design Interaction between Museum Staff and Digital Designers. Ph.D. thesis. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitet, 244 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, Anne Rørbaek. 2016. “For the Sake of Technology? The Role of Technology Views in Funding and Designing Digital Museum Communication.” Museum Management and Curatorship 31 (3): 283–298. doi:10.1080/09647775.2016.1163643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, Wanda J. 2002. “Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing.” Organization Science 13 (3): 249–273. doi:10.1287/orsc.13.3.249.2776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmigiani, Anne, and Jennifer Howard-Grenville. 2011. “Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives.” Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 413–453. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.589143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pentland, Brian T., Thorvald Haerem, and Derek Hillison. 2010. “Comparing Organizational Routines as Recurrent Patterns of Action.” Organization Studies 31 (7): 917–940. doi:10.1177/0170840610373200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Walter W., and Patricia Bromley. 2013. “New Institutionalism in the Analysis of Complex Organizations.” In International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 764–769. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pruitt, John, and Jonathan Grudin. 2003. “Personas: Practice and Theory.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences.
   Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Toni. 2014. “Interpretation Design: An Integrative, Interdisciplinary Practice.” Museum and Society 12 (3): 191–209.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Toni. 2015. “Factors Affecting the Role of Designers in Interpretation Projects.” Museum Management and Curatorship 30 (5): 379–393. doi:10.1080/09647775.2015.1055582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roppola, Tiina. 2013. Designing for the Museum Visitor Experience New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Royston, Carolyn, and Ross Parry. 2019. “Building a Framework: The Museum Sector Needs to Rethink Digital Skills - from the Ground up.” Museum 98 (1): 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Samis, Peter, and Mimi Michaelson. 2016. Creating the Visitor-Centered Museum. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, Theodore R., Karin Knorr‐Cetina, and Eike Von Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, Rianne, and Kees Dorst. 1998. “The Reflective Practice of Design Teams.” Design Studies 19 (3): 249–271. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8.
   Google Scholar
• van der Bijl-Brouwer, Mieke, and Kees Dorst. 2017. “Advancing the Strategic Impact of Human-Centred Design.” Design Studies 53: 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavoula, Giasemi, and Marco Mason. 2017. “Digital Exhibition Design: Boundary Crossing, Intermediary Design Deliverables and Processes of Consent.” Museum Management and Curatorship 32 (3): 251–271. doi:10.1080/09647775.2017.1282323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, Etienne. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Jiajie, and Donald A. Norman. 1994. “Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks.” Cognitive Science 18 (1): 87–122. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Jiajie. 1997. “The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving.” Cognitive Science 21 (2): 179–217. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2102_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar