Demystifying the Two Different Design Approaches of Architect Paul Stallan, Descriptive and Comparative Analysis of His Conventional and Iconic Design Approaches

References

• Ackoff, L. Russel. 1962. Scientific Method: Optimizing Applied Research Decision. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Akin, Omer. 1986. Psychology of Architectural Design. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, Christopher. 1964. Notes of the Synthesis of From. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anders, K. Ericsson and Herbert A. Simon. 1999. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asimov, Morris. 1963. Introduction to Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, Geoffrey. 1973. Design in Architecture, Architecture and Human Sciences. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Richard. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Way of Knowing. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darke, Jane. 1978. “The Primary Generator and the Design Process.” In New Directions in Environmental Design Research: Proceedings of EDRA 9, edited by Walter E. Rogers and William H. Ittelson, 325–337. Washington: EDRA.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2003. “The Problem of Design Problems.” In Expertise in Design, edited by N. Cross and E. Edmonds, 135–147. Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studios Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, M. Charles. 1970. On the Analysis of the Intuitive Design Process, Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fallman, Daniel. 2008. “The Interaction Design Research Triangle of Design Practice, Design Studies and Design Exploration.” Design Issues 24 (3): 4–18. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.3.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Peter, and Allen Newel. 1971. A Model for Functional Reasoning in Design. Pittsburgh, PA: Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Ken. 2000. “Creating Design Knowledge: From Research into Practice.” IDATER 2000 Conference, Loughborough University, Loughborough. San Luis Obispo, CA: J. Protzen.
   Google Scholar
• Foz, T. K. Adel. 1973. “Observations on Designer Behaviour in the Parti.” DMG-DRS Journal: Design Research and Methods 7 (4): 320–323.
   Google Scholar
• Henrion, Max. 1974. “Notes on the Synthesis of Problems: An Exploration of Problem Formulations Used by Human Designers and Automatic Systems.” MA thesis, Royal College of Art, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, Robin, and A. James Powel. 1981. Design: Science: Method Conference. Guildford: Westbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. Chris. 1963. Conference on Decision Methods. London: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, I. Rirchard, and R. John Myer. 1970. Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning, edited by G. Moore. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan. 1994. Design in Mind. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan. 2005. “How Designers Think.” 4th ed. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Bryan, and Kees Dorst. 2009. Design Expertise. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. Harold, and Erik Stolterman. 2003. “The Design Way.” In Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World - Foundations and Fundamentals of Design Competence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reitman, Walter. 1964. “Heuristic Decision Procedures, Open Constraints, and the Structure of Ill-Defined Problems.” In Graduate School of Industrial Administration. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, Steffen. 1999. “The State of Research.” Design Issues 15 (2): 18–26. doi:10.2307/1511839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Alan Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professional Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, A. Herbert. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stallan, Paul. 2009a. Protocol Study of Paul Stallan: Design Drivers. Recorded by the author. Approximately 15 minutes. Compact disc.
   Google Scholar
• Stallan, Paul. 2009b. Protocol Study of Paul Stallan: Conventional Building Design. Recorded by the author. Approximately 45 minutes. Compact disc.
   Google Scholar
• Stallan, Paul. 2009c. Protocol Study of Paul Stallan: Iconic Building Design. Recorded by the author. Approximately 30 minutes. Compact disc.
   Google Scholar
• Ulug, Ercim. 2020. “An Investigation into the Connotations of Iconic Buildings by Using a Semiotic Model of Architecture.” Social Semiotics doi:10.1080/10350330.2020.1756590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade, W. John. 1977. Architecture, Problems and Purposes: Architectural Design as a Basic Problem-Solving Process. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wurman, Richard S. 2008. “Frank Gehry: Nice Building then What?” Youtube, January 23. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWuix2tbk9Q
   Google Scholar