Implementation of Typology Criteria for Design Knowledge Reflecting Design Diversification

References

• Ahmed, S. 2005. “Encouraging Reuse of Design Knowledge: A Method to Index Knowledge.” Design Studies 26 (6): 565–592. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2005.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, B. 1981. “A View of the Nature of Design Research.” In Design: Science: Method, edited by, R. Jacques and J. Powell 30–47. Guildford Westbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, B. 2007. “The Nature of Research into Design and Design Education.” IDATER, Keynote Address to Dater 91, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, 18–47.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, R. 2004. “Learning for an Unknown Future.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 247–260. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.642841.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, E. M. 2013. “How to Perform a Systematic Search.” Best Practice & Research. Clinical Rheumatology 27 (2): 295–306. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2013.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertalanffy, L. V. 2003. General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: G. Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane Collaboration. 2017. “Trusted Evidence, Informed Decisions, Better Health.” http://cccrg.cochrane.org/what-are-systematic-reviews
   Google Scholar
• Cross, A. 1986. “Design Intelligence: The Use of Codes and Language System in Design.” Design Studies 7 (1): 14–19. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(86)90003-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. D. 1962. A Methodology for Systems Engineering. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna, R. 2018. “Computation as ‘Intervention’: A Systematic Review of ‘Outcome.” International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology 23 (1): 79–108.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T., and S. Green. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/archive/v5.1/
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 1995. “Redesigning Design: An Invitation to a Responsible Future.” In Design: Pleasure or Responsibility, edited by P. Tahkokallio and S. Vihma, 138–162. Helsinki: University of Art and Design. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/46/.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2006. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lagana, G. 2004. “Design Issues: Archive.” Design Issues 20 (1): 62–63. doi:10.1162/074793604772933775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnert, M. 2007. “Typologies in Social Inquiry.” In Research Design in Political Science, edited by T. Gschwend and F. Schimmelfennig, 62–79. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1974. Structural Anthropology. Revised ed.. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Love, T. 2000. “Philosophy of Design: A Meta-Theoretical Structure for Design Theory.” Design Studies 21 (3): 293–313. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00012-5.
   Google Scholar
• Marradi, A. 1990. “Classification, Typology, Taxonomy.” Quality & Quantity 24 (2): 129–157. doi:10.1007/BF00209548.
   Google Scholar
• Mesarovic, M. D., D. Macko, and Y. Takahara. 1970. Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli, N. 2011. “Active, Local, Connected: Strategic and Methodological Insights in Three Cases.” Design Issues 27 (2): 90–110. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00079-Morelli.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, W., and G. Pasman. 1996. “Typology and the Organization of Design Knowledge.” Design Studies 17 (2): 111–130. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(95)00030-U.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. 1990. “Prior Knowledge in Design: A Dynamic Knowledge-Based Model of Design and Creativity.” Design Studies 11 (1): 17–28. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(90)90011-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Poggenpohl, S. H., and K. Sato. 2011. Design Integrations: Research and Collaboration. Korean translation ed. Seoul: Bestun Korea Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., and A. Chakrabarti. 2015. “Creativity: Generic Definition, Tests, Factors and Methods.” International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology 21 (1): 7–37.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1988. “Designing: Rules, Types and Words.” Design Studies 9 (3): 181–190. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(88)90047-6.
   Google Scholar
• Warfield, J. N. 1973. Structuring Complex Systems. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Warfield, J. N. 1976. Societal Systems: Planning, Policy, and Complexity. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S., and L. Zamberlan. 2015. “Design for an Unknown Future: Amplified Roles for Collaboration, New Design Knowledge, and Creativity.” Design Issues 31 (2): 3–15. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar