User-Centred Design without Involving Users: A Longitudinal Case Study in a Human-Centred-Design–Mature Company

References

• Akrich, Madeleine. 1995. “User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology.” In Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, edited by A. Rip, T. J. Misa, and J. Schot, 167–184. London: Pinter Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, Michael. 1996. Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Earthy, Jonathan. 1998. “Usability Maturity Model: Human Centredness Scale.” http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.m.rauterberg/lecturenotes/USability-Maturity-Model[1].PDF
   Google Scholar
• Eshet, Eyal, and Harry Bouwman. 2016. “Context of Use: The Final Frontier in the Practice of User-Centered Design?” Interacting with Computers 29 (3): 368–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iww030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomin, Joseph. 2014. “What is Human Centred Design?” The Design Journal 17 (4): 606–623. doi:https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X14056185480186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin. 2016. “It’s More of a Mindset than a Method’: UX Practitioners’ Conception of Design Methods.” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’16, 4044–4055. New York: ACM Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858410.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Wayne, and Marilyn Salzman. 1998. “Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods.” Human–Computer Interaction 13 (3): 203–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1303_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackos, JoAnn, and Janice Redish. 1998. User and Task Analysis for Interface Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsed, Tasha, and DavidG. Novick. 2007. “Usability Inspection Methods after 15 Years of Research and Practice.” Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication – SIGDOC ’07, 249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1297144.1297200.
   Google Scholar
• Hornbaek, Kasper. 2010. “Dogmas in the Assessment of Usability Evaluation Methods.” Behaviour & Information Technology 29 (1): 97–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290801939400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, Sampsa. 2010. Health Technology Development and Use. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, Sampsa, and Mikael Johnson. 2015. “The User as Relational Entity: Options That Deeper Insight into User Representations Opens for Human-Centered Design.” Information Technology & People 28 (1): 72–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2014-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 9241-11. 1998. “Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on Usability.”
   Google Scholar
• ISO_9241-210. 2019. “ISO 9241-210:2019 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction – Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems.”
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027295286-02jef.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mikael. 2013. How Social Media Changes User-Centred Design - Cumulative and Strategic User Involvement with Respect to Developer–User Social Distance. Helsinki: Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mikael, Sampsa Hyysalo, Samuli Mäkinen, Pia Helminen, Kaisa Savolainen, Louna Hakkarainen. 2014. “From Recipes to Meals … and Dietary Regimes: Method Mixes as Key Emerging Topic in Human-Centred Design.” In NordiCHI ’14 Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational, 343–352. Helsinki, Finland: ACM, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Jokela, Timo. 2004. “Evaluating the User-Centredness of Development Organisations: Conclusions and Implications from Empirical Usability Capability Maturity Assessments.” Interacting with Computers 16 (6): 1095–1132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotro, Tanja. 2005. Hobbyist Knowing in Product Development: Desirable Objects and Passion for Sports in Suunto Corporation. Helsinki, Finland: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, Kari. 1996. “Activity Theory as a Potential Framework for Human/Computer Interaction.” In Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, edited by Bonnie Nardi, 45–67. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacerda, Thaísa C., and Christiane Gresse von Wangenheim. 2018. “Systematic Literature Review of Usability Capability/Maturity Models.” Computer Standards and Interfaces 55: 1339–1351. (June 2017): doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkinen, Samuli, Sampsa Hyysalo, and Mikael Johnson. 2019. “Ecologies of User Knowledge: Linking User Insight in Organisations to Specific Projects.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (3): 340–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1502874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti, Patrizia, and Liam J. Bannon. 2009. “Exploring User-Centred Design in Practice: Some Caveats.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 22 (1): 7–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-009-9062-3.
   Google Scholar
• Miaskiewicz, Tomasz, and Kenneth A. Kozar. 2011. “Personas and User-Centered Design: How Can Personas Benefit Product Design Processes?” Design Studies 32 (5): 417–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Jakob. 1993. Usability Engineering. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Jakob, and VictoriaL. Phillips. 1993. “Estimating the Relative Usability of Two Interfaces: Heuristic, Formal, and Empirical Methods Compared.” Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 214–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169173.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, DonaldA, and StephenW. Draper. 1986. User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn, Nelly, and Trevor Pinch. 2003. How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oygür, Işıl. 2018. “The Machineries of User Knowledge Production.” Design Studies 54: 23–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, Kaisa, and Sampsa Hyysalo. 2020. “Cumulative and Combined: Analyzing Methods Use in a Human-Centered Design Mature Company.” Journal of Usability Studies 15 (2): 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen, Kaisa, and Sampsa Hyysalo. 2021. “User Representations as a Design Resource: achieving Accountable Design without Access to Users.” Science and Technology Studies 34 (2): 25–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.84598.
   Google Scholar
• Schønheyder, Jan Fredrik, and Kjetil Nordby. 2018. “The Use and Evolution of Design Methods in Professional Design Practice.” Design Studies 58: 36–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweisfurth, Tim G., and Christina Raasch. 2015. “Embedded Lead Users – The Benefits of Employing Users for Corporate Innovation.” Research Policy 44 (1): 168–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, Tiago, Da Silva, Angela Martin, Frank Maurer, and Milene Silveira. 2011. “User-Centered Design and Agile Methods: A Systematic Review.” In 2011 Agile Conference, 77–86. Salt Lake City, UT: IEEE. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/AGILE.2011.24.
   Google Scholar
• Silvast, Antti, Robin Williams, Sampsa Hyysalo, Kjetil Rommetveit, and Charles Raab. 2018. “Who ‘Uses’ Smart Grids? The Evolving Nature of User Representations in Layered Infrastructures.” Sustainability 10 (10): 3738. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sismondo, Sergio. 2008. “Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 3rd ed., 13–32. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solano, Andres, Cesar A. Collazos, Cristian Rusu, and Habib M. Fardoun. 2016. “Combinations of Methods for Collaborative Evaluation of the Usability of Interactive Software Systems.” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2016: 1–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4089520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Bijl-Brouwer, Mieke and Kees Dorst. 2017. “Advancing the Strategic Impact of Human-Centred Design.” Design Studies 53: 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardlaw, Jessica. 2016. “Introducing User-Centred Design: A Longitudinal Study of a Healthcare Informatics Organisation.” http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1475062/1/Jessica Wardlaw EngDthesis_Feb16.pdf.COMBINED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Robin, James Stewart, and Roger Slack. 2005. Social Learning in Technological Innovation – Experimenting with Information and COmmunication Technologies. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, Christopher R. and De Angeli, Antonella. 2014. “Applying User Centred and Participatory Design Approaches to Commercial Product Development.” Design Studies 35 (6): 614–631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2014.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Woolrych, Alan, Kasper Hornbaek, Erik Frøkjaer, and Gilbert Cockton. 2011. “Ingredients and Meals Rather than Recipes: A Proposal for Research That Does Not Treat Usability Evaluation Methods as Indivisible Wholes.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27 (10): 940–970. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2011.555314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar