Using normative inquiry and co-design to embed inclusive design in social design education

References

• Amatullo, Mariana, Bryan Boyer, Jennifer May, and Andrew Shea (Eds.) 2022. Design for Social Innovation – Case Studies from around the World. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amatullo, Mariana, Liliana Becerra, and Steven Montgomery. 2011. “Designmatters Case Studies: Design Education Methodologies as a Tool for Social Innovation, 1–17.” Proceedings of the Open, the Annual Conference, Washington DC, March 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Leah, Jocelyn Bailey, Guy Julier, and Lucy Kimbell. 2014. Social Design Futures: HEI Research and the AHRC. Brighton: AHRC, University of Brighton, VandA.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, Sherry. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge EDC. n.d. “Concept Design Process: Overview.” Inclusive Design Toolkit. http://www.inclusivedesigntoolkit.com/GS_overview/overview.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Dung-Sheng, Lu-Lin Cheng, Caroline Hummels, and IIpo Koskinen. 2016. “Social Design: An Introduction.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deserti, Alessandro, Francesca Rizzo, Onur Cobanli, and Schröder, Zirngiebl. 2018. “From Social Design to Design for Social Innovation.” In Atlas of Social Innovation: New Practices for a Better Future, edited by Jürgen Howaldt, Christoph Kaletka, Antonius Marthe, 65–69. Dortmund: TU Dortmund University.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1938. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company
   Google Scholar
• DeZure, Deborah. 2017. “Interdisciplinary Pedagogies in Higher Education.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Robert Frodeman, 2nd ed., 558–572. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Easterday, Matthew W., Elizabeth M. Gerber, and Daniel G. Rees Lewis. 2018. “Social Innovation Networks: A New Approach to Social Design Education and Impact.” Design Issues 34 (2): 64–76. doi:10.1162/074793602320827406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foverskov, Maria. 2022. “Performative Modes of Inquiry as Everyday Theatre.” In Proceedings of DRS2022, Bilbao, edited by Dan Lockton, Sara Lenzi, Paul Hekkert, Arlene Oak, Juan Sádaba, Peter Lloyd, 25 June–3 July. London: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Frascara, Jorge. 2017. “Design, and Design Education: How Can They Get Together?” Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 16 (1): 125–131. doi:10.1386/adch.16.1.125_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudio, Chiara Del., Carlo Franzato, and Alfredo. J. de Oliveira. 2016. “Sharing Design Agency with Local Partners in Participatory Design.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, Kara. L., Brooke. A. Stipelman, Amanda. L. Vogel, and Daniel Stokols. 2017. “Understanding Cross-Disciplinary Team-Based Research: Concepts and Conceptual Models from the Science of Team Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Robert Frodeman, 2nd ed., 338–356. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helvacioglu, Elif, and Nazli Nazende Karamanoglu. 2012. “Awareness of the Concept of Universal Design in Design Education.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 51: 99–103. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.125.
   Google Scholar
• Heylighen, Ann, and Matteo Bianchin. 2013. “How Does Inclusive Design Relate to Good Design? Designing as a Deliberative Enterprise.” Design Studies 34 (1): 93–110. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzer, Cinnamon L., and Lauren S. Weinstein. 2014. “Social Design and Neocolonialism.” Design and Culture 6 (3): 327–343. doi:10.2752/175613114X14105155617429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaszynska, Patrycja. 2022. “Social Design as Normative Inquiry”. In Proceedings of DRS2022, Bilbao, edited by Dan Lockton, Sara Lenzi, Paul Hekkert, Arlene Oak, Juan Sádaba, Peter Lloyd, 25 June–3 July. London: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinsmann, Maaike, and Rianne Valkenburg. 2008. “Barriers and Enablers for Creating Shared Understanding in Co-Design Projects.” Design Studies 29 (4): 369–386. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leerberg, Malene, Vibeke Riisberg, and Joy Boutrup. 2010. “Design Responsibility and Sustainable Design as Reflective Practice: An Educational Challenge.” Sustainable Development 18 (5): 306–317. doi:10.1002/sd.481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio, and Eduardo Staszowski (Eds.) 2013. “Public and Collaborative – Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy.” DESIS Network. https://www.desisnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/DESIS_PUBLIColab-Book.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio. 2014. “Making Things Happen: Social Innovation and Design.” Design Issues 30 (1): 57–66. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, Victor, and Sylvia Margolin. 2002. “A ‘Social Model’ of Design: Issues of Practice and Research.” Design Issues 18 (4): 24–30. doi:10.1162/074793602320827406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolin, Victor. 2019. “Social Design: From Utopia to the Good Society.” In Social Design Reader, edited by Elizabeth Resnick, 3–7. London: Bloomsberg Publishing PLC.
   Google Scholar
• Melles, Gavin, Ian de Vere, and Vanja Misic. 2011. “Socially Responsible Design: Thinking beyond the Triple Bottom Line to Socially Responsive and Sustainable Product Design.” CoDesign 7 (3–4): 143–154. doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.630473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, Michael W., and Don Norman. 2020. “Changing Design Education for the 21st Century.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 6 (1): 13–49. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• O'Rafferty, Simon, Hannah Curtis, and Frank O'Connor. 2014. “Mainstreaming Sustainability in Design Education – A Capacity Building Framework.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 15 (2): 169–187. doi:10.1108/IJSHE-05-2012-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, David, Roger Whitham, Gemma Coupe, and Leon Cruickshank. 2022. “Talking about Food: Reflecting on Transition of Practice in People with Lived Experience of Food Poverty.” In Proceedings of DRS2022, Bilbao, edited by Dan Lockton, Sara Lenzi, Paul Hekkert, Arlene Oak, Juan Sádaba, Peter Lloyd, 25 June–3 July. London: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, Shivani. 2022. “Preparing for the Pluriverse: Embracing Critical Self-Reflection in Service Design Practice.” In Proceedings of DRS2022, Bilbao, edited by Dan Lockton, Sara Lenzi, Paul Hekkert, Arlene Oak, Juan Sádaba, Peter Lloyd, 25 June–3 July. London: Design Research Society.
   Google Scholar
• Predan, Barbara. 2021. “A Discussion of Processes to Create a Curriculum and Handbook for Co-Creation and Active Implementation of Co-Design with the Aim of Stimulating Collective Creativity.” The Design Journal 24 (4): 589–609. doi:10.1080/14606925.2021.1930933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, Mariano, Jr., 2011. “Designing with a Social Conscience: An Emerging Area in Industrial Design Education and Practice.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, Copenhagen, Volume 5: Design for X / Design to X, edited by Steve Culley, Ben Hicks, Tim McAloone, Thomas Howard, Johan Malmqvist, 39–48. Glasgow: The Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, Elizabeth. 2019. “Chapter One – Introduction.” In Social Design Reader, edited by Resnick  , 3–7. London: Bloomsberg Publishing PLC.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth B.-N., and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, Timothy. J. 2014. “Deliberation in and through Higher Education.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (1): 1–5. doi:10.16997/jdd.198.
   Google Scholar
• Sirel, Ayse, and Osman Umit Sirel. 2018. “Universal Design’ Approach for the Participation of the Disabled in Urban Life.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 12: 11–21. doi:10.17265/1934-7359/2018.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, Adam, and Lorraine Gamman. 2014. “Learning Together: Students and Community Groups Co-Designing for Carbon Reduction in the London Borough of Camden.” In Public and Collaborative – Exploring the Intersection of Design, Social Innovation and Public Policy, edited by Ezio Manzini and Eduardo Staszowski, 51–73. New York: DESIS Network.
   Google Scholar
• Tromp, Nynke, and Stéphane Vial. 2022. “Five Components of Social Design: A Unified Framework to Support Research and Practice.” The Design Journal : 1–19. doi:10.1080/14606925.2022.2088098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromp, Nynke, and Paul Hekkert. 2016. “Assessing Methods for Effect-Driven Design: Evaluation of a Social Design Method.” Design Studies 43: 24–47. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usal, Selhan Yalcin, and Nilay Evcil. 2019. “Universal Design in Interior Architecture Education: The Case of Store Design.” Iconarp International Journal of Architecture and Planning 7 (2): 410–427. doi:10.15320/ICONARP.2019.92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vere, Ian de, Ajay Kapoor, and Gavin Melles. 2011. “An Ethical Stance: Engineering Curricula Designed for Social Responsibility.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, Copenhagen, Volume 8: Design Education, edited by Steve Culley, Ben Hicks, Tim McAloone, Thomas Howard, Bill Ion, 216–225. Glasgow: The Design Society.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Wei., Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Tie Ji. 2016. “Using Community Engagement to Drive Co-Creation in Rural China.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar