The design brief as a pivotal tool: A study of Centro Brasil Design’s practices to promote design

References

• Baxter, Mike. 1995. Product Design - Practical Methods for the Systematic Development of New Products. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Tim. 2008. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review 86 (6): 84–92, 141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawood, Gavin, Alan Lewis, and Gisele Raulik. 2010. “International Perspectives on Design Support for SMEs.” Design Management Review 15 (4): 71–76. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7169.2004.tb00185.x.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Centro Brasil Design), and APEXBrasil. 2017. Inovação e Design Para Exportação. Curitiba: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Centro Brasil Design), and APEXBrasil 2018. Design Export: Report 2018. Curitiba: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• CBD (Centro Brasil Design). 2016. Design Export: Metodologia Design na Prática. Curitiba: CBD.
   Google Scholar
• Checkland, Peter. 2000. “Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17 (S1): S11–S58. doi:10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Youngok, Sungwoo Lim, and Martyn Evans. 2012. “Supporting Design: National Business Support Programmes in the UK and South Korea.” The Design Journal 15 (1): 79–104. doi:10.2752/175630612X13192035508589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Robert. G. 1990. “Stage-Gate Systems: A New Tool for Managing New Products.” Business Horizons 33 (3): 44–54. doi:10.1016/0007-6813(90)90040-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, Juliet, and Anselm Strauss. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria.” Qualitative Sociology 13 (1): 3–21. doi:10.1007/BF00988593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, John. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Design Center. 2015. "The Design Ladder: Four Steps of Design Use." Accessed 4 July 2021. https://danskdesigncenter.dk/en/design-ladder-four-steps-design-use
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, Mansur. J., and Stephen. J. Culley. 2004. “A Model of Factors Influencing the Design Requirement.” Design Studies 25 (4): 329–350. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2003.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, Kristel. 2020. “Integrating Sustainability in the Strategic Stage of an Innovation Process: A Design Brief Perspective.” In Design and Manufacturing, edited by Evren Yasa, Mohsen Mhadhbi, Eleonora Santecchia. London: IntechOpen. doi:10.5772/intechopen.89604.
   Google Scholar
• Er, Ozlem, Yasemin Soylu, Deniz Leblebici Basar, and Ali Gokkurt. 2013. “A New Model to Introduce SMEs with Design.” In Proceedings of the 10th European Academy of Design Conference - Crafting the Future, 1–18. Gothenburg: Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Martyn, and John Chisholm. 2016. “Design for Europe: Employing Scenarios to Benchmark the Effectiveness of European Design Policy.” The Design Journal 19 (2): 253–268. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1130362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulari, Melehat Nil., Susan Fairburn, and Julian Malins. 2013. “Assessing the Effectiveness of Design-Led Innovation Support for SMEs.” In Proceedings of the 10th European Academy of Design Conference - Crafting the Future, 1–16. Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Gulari, Melehat Nil., Ruth-Helene Melioranski, Ozlem Er, and Chris Fremantle. 2017. “The Future of Design Support: What Can We Learn from Design Support Experience in the UK, Estonia and Turkey?” The Design Journal 20 (Supp 1): S669–S680. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1353013.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, Anders. 2015. “Emergence Patterns for Client Design Requirements.” Design Studies 39: 48–69. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2015.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevnaker, Birgit Helene. 2005. “Vita Activa: On Relationships between Design(Ers) and Business.” Design Issues 21 (3): 25–48. doi:10.1162/0747936054406753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor, Patrick, Adrian O'Donoghue, Brendan Wafer, and Eddie Commins. 2015. “Design-Driven Innovation-Why it Matters for SME Competitiveness.” Accessed 18 February 2022. http://edepositireland.ie/handle/2262/82846
   Google Scholar
• Liedtka, Jeanne, and Tim Ogilvie. 2011. Designing for Growth: A Design Thinking Tool Kit for Managers. New York: Columbia Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Sylvia Xihui, Huirong Liu, and Yanmin Zhang. 2018. “The New Role of Design in Innovation: A Policy Perspective from China.” The Design Journal 21 (1): 37–58. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1395167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, Rachel, Hans Haenlein, and Keith Bright. 2001. “Project Briefing for Accessible Design.” Design Studies 22 (3): 297–315. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00031-4.
   Google Scholar
• Nutt, Bev. 1993. “The Strategic Brief.” Facilities 11 (9): 28–32. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000002257.
   Google Scholar
• Parkman, Ian, and Keven Malkewitz. 2019. “Design Briefs in Design-Driven New Product Development.” Journal of Design, Business & Society 5 (1): 35–58. doi:10.1386/dbs.5.1.35_1.
   Google Scholar
• Paton, Bec, and Kees Dorst. 2011. “Briefing and Reframing: A Situated Practice.” Design Studies 32 (6): 573–587. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, Soren. 2010. “Developing an Inspirational Design Brief.” In Proceedings of the Design 2010 – 11th International Design Conference, 1173–1182. Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Soren Ingomar, Jaewoo Joo, and Shelley Takahashi. 2015. “Inspirational Design Briefing Performance.” In Proceedings of the ICED 15 - 20th International Conference on Engineering Design, 371–378. Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Soren, and Jaewoo Joo. 2016. “Inspirational Design Briefing.” In Design Thinking: New Product Development Essentials from the PDMA, edited by Michael G. Luchs, Scott Swan, Abbie Griffin, 15–26. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119154273.ch2.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Soren, and Peter. L. Phillips. 2011. “Inspiring Design — Informed by Metrics." DMI.” Design Management Review 22 (2): 62–71. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7169.2011.00127.x.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Peter. L. 2012. Creating the Perfect Design Brief: How to Manage Design for Strategic Advantage. New York: Allworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raulik, Gisele. 2004. “Models of Design Intervention.” In Proceedings of the Futureground - Design Research Society International Conference, 188–201. Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Raulik, Gisele, Gavin Cawood, and Povl Larsen. 2008. “National Design Strategies and Country Competitive Economic Advantage.” The Design Journal 11 (2): 119–135. doi:10.2752/175630608X329217.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowska, Noemi, and Dominic Laffy. 2017. “The Design Brief: Inquiry into the Starting Point in a Learning Journey.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S1380–S1389. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipilä, Pekka, and Aleksi Kuitunen. 2006. “Industrial Practices in Design Briefing - A Survey of the Finnish Industry.” In Proceedings of the NordDesign 2006 Conference, 408–418. Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Whan Oh., Min Jeong Song, Jongmin Park, and Ken Kyung Won Chung. 2007. “Changing Roles of Design Promotion Organizations in the Global Context and a New Theoretical Model for a Design Promotion System.” In Proceedings of the IASDR07 - International Association of Societies of Design Research, 1–19. Hong Kong
   Google Scholar
• ten Klooster, Roland, and Bjorn de Koeijer. 2016. “Utilising the Potential of Design Briefs in Sustainable Packaging Development.” In Proceedings of the IAPRI 2016 - 20th World Conference on Packaging: Innovation, Development and Sustainability in Packaging, 200–207. Campinas, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Whicher, Anna, Gisele Raulik-Murphy, and Gavin Cawood. 2011. “Evaluating Design: Understanding the Return on Investment.” Design Management Review 22 (2): 44–52. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7169.2011.00125.x.
   Google Scholar