Enacting individual ambidexterity in design entrepreneurship

References

• Abecassis-Moedas, C., S. BenMahmoud-Jouini, D. Manceau, and J. Pereira. 2021. “Imprinting of Founders’ Entrepreneurial Motivations on Enterprises’ Practices and Processes: The Context of Creative Industries.” Creativity and Innovation Management 30 (1): 182–197. doi:10.1111/caim.12421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albinsson, S. 2018. “Musicians as Entrepreneurs or Entrepreneurs as Musicians?” Creativity and Innovation Management 27 (3): 348–357. doi:10.1111/caim.12254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriopoulos, C., and M. W. Lewis. 2009. “Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation.” Organization Science 20 (4): 696–717. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashford, S. J., B. B. Caza, and E. M. Reid. 2018. “From Surviving to Thriving in the Gig Economy: A Research Agenda for Individuals in the New World of Work.” Research in Organizational Behavior 38: 23–41. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2018.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bérubé, J., and J. B. Gauthier. 2021. “Managing Projects in Creative Industries: A Compromise between Artistic and Project Management Values.” Creative Industries Journal : 1–20. doi:10.1080/17510694.2021.1979278.
   Google Scholar
• Bledow, R., M. Frese, N. Anderson, M. Erez, and J. Farr. 2009. “A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity.” Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2 (3): 305–337. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, A. D. 2016. “Fostering an Entrepreneurial Mindset by Using a Design Thinking Approach in Entrepreneurship Education.” Industry and Higher Education 30 (3): 215–223. doi:10.1177/0950422216653195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., and J. Birkinshaw. 2004. “The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity.” Academy of Management Journal 47 (2): 209–226. doi:10.2307/20159573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, J. F., and J. A. Holstein. 2009. Analyzing Narrative Reality. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., and B. Cambré. 2020. “Designers’ Road(s) to Success.” Balancing Exploration and Exploitation” Journal of Business Research 115: 241–249.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygan, P., A. O. İlhan, and I. Oygür. 2020. “Change in Industrial Designers' Jobs: The Case of Turkey, 1984–2018.” The Design Journal 23 (6): 821–841. doi:10.1080/14606925.2020.1802892.
   Google Scholar
• Klonek, F. E., T. Volery, and S. K. Parker. 2021. “Managing the Paradox: Individual Ambidexterity, Paradoxical Leadership and Multitasking in Entrepreneurs across Firm Life Cycle Stages.” International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship 39 (1): 40–63. doi:10.1177/0266242620943371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, E., and W. Harvey. 2015. “Managing Exploration and Exploitation Paradoxes in Creative Organisations.” Management Decision 53 (4): 809–827. doi:10.1108/MD-03-2014-0124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, K., and S. A. Wewel. 2018. “Skills, Scope and Success: An Empirical Look at the Start‐Up Process in Creative Industries in Germany.” Creativity and Innovation Management 27 (3): 295–318. doi:10.1111/caim.12279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwik, S., A. Rietberg, and M. Visser. 2016. “Resolving the Paradox of Ambidextrous R&D Routines: How to Turn Engineers into Chameleons.” Paper presented at the R&D Management Conference 2016, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organisational Learning.” Organization Science 2 (1): 71–87. doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. L., P. R. Christensen, and P. Storvang. 2021. “Does Design Thinking Benefit Ambidextrous Dynamics Between SME Managers’ Entrepreneurial and Administrative Mindsets?” The Design Journal 24 (5): 683–703. doi:10.1080/14606925.2021.1959121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S., B. Norlyk, and P. R. Christensen. 2018. “Salesman? Hell No!’ Identity Struggles of Nascent Design Entrepreneurs.” Creativity and Innovation Management 27 (3): 358–369. doi:10.1111/caim.12275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papachroni, A., and L. Heracleous. 2020. “Ambidexterity as Practice: Individual Ambidexterity through Paradoxical Practices.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 56 (2): 143–165. doi:10.1177/0021886320913048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, A., N. Mylonas, and C. Frangakis. 2022. “Investigating Women Entrepreneurs in Creative Industries: Critical Determinants for Venture Performance.” Creative Industries Journal : 1–25. doi:10.1080/17510694.2022.2077575.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., S. Scott, and A. Geddes. 2019. Snowball Sampling. London, UK: Sage Research Methods Foundations. doi:10.4135/9781526421036831710.
   Google Scholar
• Penaluna, A., and K. Penaluna. 2008. “Business Paradigms in Einstellung: Harnessing Creative Mindsets, a Creative Industries Perspective.” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship 21 (2): 231–250. doi:10.1080/08276331.2008.10593588.
   Google Scholar
• Penaluna, A., and K. Penaluna. 2009. “Creativity in Business/Business in Creativity: Transdisciplinary Curricula as an Enabling Strategy in Enterprise Education.” Industry and Higher Education 23 (3): 209–219. doi:10.5367/000000009788640314.
   Google Scholar
• Petriglieri, G., S. J. Ashford, and A. Wrzesniewski. 2019. “Agony and Ecstasy in the Gig Economy: Cultivating Holding Environments for Precarious and Personalized Work Identities.” Administrative Science Quarterly 64 (1): 124–170. doi:10.1177/0001839218759646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politis, D. 2005. “The Process of Entrepreneurial Learning: A Conceptual Framework.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 29 (4): 399–424. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00091.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosing, K., and H. Zacher. 2017. “Individual Ambidexterity: The Duality of Exploration and Exploitation and Its Relationship with Innovative Performance.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 26 (5): 694–709. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2016.1238358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schediwy, L., P. V. Bhansing, and E. Loots. 2018. “Young Musicians’ Career Identities: Do Bohemian and Entrepreneurial Career Identities Compete or Cohere?” Creative Industries Journal 11 (2): 174–196. doi:10.1080/17510694.2018.1489197.
   Google Scholar
• Sigurdardottir, A. G., A. Ujwary‐Gil, and M. Candi. 2018. “B2B Negotiation Tactics in Creative Sectors.” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 33 (4): 429–441. doi:10.1108/JBIM-10-2016-0232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundler, A. J., E. Lindberg, C. Nilsson, and L. Palmer. 2019. “Qualitative Thematic Analysis Based on Descriptive Phenomenology.” Nursing open 6 (3): 733–739. doi:10.1002/nop2.275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabeau, Kasia, Gerda Gemser, Erik Jan Hultink, and Nachoem M. Wijnberg. 2017. “Exploration and Exploitation Activities for Design Innovation.” Journal of Marketing Management 33 (3-4): 203–225. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2016.1195855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2015. “It’s All about Games: Enterprise and Entrepreneurialism in Digital Games.” New Technology, Work and Employment 30 (1): 32–46. doi:10.1111/ntwe.12042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar