Design types in diversified city administration: The case City of Helsinki

References

• Bailey, J., and P. Lloyd. 2016. “The Introduction of Design to Policymaking: Policy Lab and the UK Government.” In Future Focused Thinking: DRS International Conference 2016, 27–30 June, edited by P. Lloyd and E. Bohemia,3619–3633. Brighton, United Kingdom: DRS Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2016. “Introduction: The Design for Policy Nexus.” In Design for Policy, edited by C. Bason, 26–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2018. Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. Second edition. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C., and A. Schneider. 2016. “Public Design in Global Perspective: Empirical Trends.” In Design for Policy, edited by C. Bason, 48–67. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berglund, E. 2013. “Design as Activism in Helsinki: Notes from the World Design Capital 2012.” Design and Culture 5 (2): 195–214. doi:10.2752/175470813X13638640370779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, E. 2018. “The Promise of Co‐Design for Public Policy.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 77 (4): 729–743. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botero, A., S. Hyysalo, C. Kohtala, and J. Whalen. 2020. “Getting Participatory Design Done: From Methods and Choices to Translation Work across Constituent Domains.” International Journal of Design 14 (2): 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. 2007. “Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services.” Public Administration Review 67 (5): 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Helsinki. 2020. “Helsinki City Organisation.” https://www.hel.fi/helsinki/en/administration/administration/organization/.
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsinki. 2021a. “Helsinki’s Design Journey.” https://design.hel.fi/en/helsinki-city-of-design/helsinkis-design-journey/.
   Google Scholar
• City of Helsinki. 2021b. “Why Design?” https://design.hel.fi/en/helsinki-city-of-design/why-design/.
   Google Scholar
• Courage, C., T. Borrup, M. R. Jackson, K. Legge, A. McKeown, L. Platt, and J. Schupbach (eds.). 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Placemaking. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Design Centre. 2015. “The Design Ladder: Four Steps of Design Use.” https://danskdesigncenter.dk/en/design-ladder-four-steps-design-use
   Google Scholar
• Deserti, A., F. Rizzo, and M. Smallman. 2020. “Experimenting with Co-Design in STI Policy Making.” Policy Design and Practice 3 (2): 135–149. doi:10.1080/25741292.2020.1764692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Design Commission. 2013. Restarting Britain 2: Design and Public Services. London: Design Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. 2013. Design for Public Good. London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Dumas, A., and H. Mintzberg. 2010. “Managing Design, Designing Management.” Design Management Journal 1 (1): 37–43. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7169.1989.tb00519.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, D., and R. Martin. 2006. “Design Thinking and How It Will Change Management Education: An Interview and Discussion.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5 (4): 512–523. doi:10.5465/amle.2006.23473212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earthy, J. 1998. “Usability Maturity Model: Human Centredness Scale.” https://rauterberg.employee.id.tue.nl/lecturenotes/Usability-Maturity-Model%5b1%5d.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. F. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorb, P., and A. Dumas. 1987. “Silent Design.” Design Studies 8 (3): 150–156. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(87)90037-8.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. 2019. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Second edition. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, J., J.-J. Lee, and T. Mattelmäki. 2015. “Fragile Liaisons: Challenges in Cross-Organizational Service Networks and the Role of Design.” The Design Journal 18 (2): 249–268. doi:10.2752/175630615X14212498964358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, J., and T. Mattelmäki. 2015. “Service Prototyping and Organizational Transformation: Playing with the Potential Problems and Solutions.” In Tangible Means EKSIG Conference, edited by J. B. Anne Louise Bang, 380–391. Kolding: Designskolen Kolding.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, V., and S. Hyysalo. 2018. “The Mundane and Strategic Work in Collaborative Design.” Design Issues 34 (3): 42–58. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., and L. Hakkarainen. 2014. “What difference does a living lab make? Comparison of two health technology innovation projects.” CoDesign 10 (3–4): 191–208.
   Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., V. Hyysalo, and L. Hakkarainen. 2019. “The Work of Democratized Design in Setting-up a Hosted Citizen-Designer Community.” International Journal of Design 13 (1): 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyysalo, S., T. Elgaard Jenssen, and N. Oudshoorn. 2016. The New Production of Users: Changing Innovation Collectives and Involvement Strategies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Junginger, S. 2009. “Design in the Organization: Parts and Wholes.” Design Research Journal 2, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Junginger, S., and J. Body. 2008. “Design in the Australian Taxation Office.” Design Issues 24 (1): 55–67. doi:10.1162/desi.2008.24.1.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A., M. van der, Bijl Brouwer, I. Mulder, and P. Lloyd. 2022. “A Study on Strategic Activities to Foster Design Practices in a Local Government Organization.” In DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June to 3 July, edited by D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sádaba, and P. Lloyd. Bilbao, Spain: DRS Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Komatsu, T., M. Salgado, A. Deserti, and A. Rizzo. 2021. “Policy Labs Challenges in the Public Sector: The Value of Design for More Responsive Organizations.” Policy Design and Practice 4 (2): 271–291. doi:10.1080/25741292.2021.1917173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. 2015. “Recognizing Design: The Artistic Director as Silent Designer.” Design Issues 31 (4): 56–66. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. 2020. “Frame Failures and Reframing Dialogues in the Public Sector Design Projects.” International Journal of Design 14 (1): 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matschoss, K., and E. Heiskanen. 2018. “Innovation intermediary challenging the energy incumbent: Enactment of local socio-technical transition pathways by destabilisation of regime rules. ”Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30 (12): 1455–1469.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, M., E. Blomkamp, and J. Lewis. 2018. “The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 249–267. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meroni, A., and D. Sangiorgi. 2011. Design for Services. Farnham, UK: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, R., B. Giesteira, A. Boddington, and C. Farinha. 2022. “On the Importance of an Enlarged ‘Design for Policy’ Framework within the Public Policy Cycle.” In DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June - 3 July, edited by D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sádaba, P. Lloyd, P. Bilbao, Spain: DRS Digital Library. doi:10.21606/drs.2022.817.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Fostering Innovation in the Public Sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Park-Lee, S. 2020. “Contexts of Briefing for Service Design Procurements in the Finnish Public Sector.” Design Studies 69: 100945. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2020.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penin, L. 2018. An Introduction to Service Design: Designing the Invisible. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Pietro, M., H. Perks, and M. B. Beverland. 2018. “Elevating Design in the Organization.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 35 (4): 629–651. doi:10.1111/jpim.12434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirinen, A., K. Savolainen, S. Hyysalo, and T Mattelmäki 2022. “Design Enters the City: Requisites and Points of Friction in Deepening Public Sector Design.” International Journal of Design 16 (3): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantisi, N. M., and D. Leslie. 2006. “Branding the Design Metropole: The Case of Montréal, Canada.” Area 38 (4): 364–376. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2006.00705.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebolledo, N. 2016. “The Value of Service Design in Policy Making.” In Service Design Impact Report: Public Sector, edited by B. Mager, 40–46. Köln: Service Design Network.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, F., F. Schmittinger, and A. Deserti. 2020. “Expanding Innovation Capacity in Public Sector by Design Projects.” In Synergy – DRS International Conference 2020, edited by S. Boess, M. Cheung, and R. Cain. 11–14. DRS Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Saguin, K., and B. Cashore. 2022. “Two Logics of Participation in Policy Design.” Policy Design and Practice 5 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1080/25741292.2022.2038978.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiorgi, D., A. Prendiville, and J. Jung. 2017. “Expanding (service) design spaces.” In Designing for Service: Key Issues and New Directions, edited by D. San-giorgi and A. Prendiville, 17–31. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and T. Robertson. 2013. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Starostka, J., and A. De Götzen. 2022. “What a Designer Does in a Municipality? Different Approaches towards Design in Three Danish Municipalities.” In DRS2022: Bilbao, 25 June – 3 July, edited by D. Lockton, S. Lenzi, P. Hekkert, A. Oak, J. Sádaba, and P. Lloyd. Bilbao, Spain: DRS Digital Library.
   Google Scholar
• Tõnurist, P., R. Kattel, and V. Lember. 2017. “Innovation Labs in the Public Sector: What They Are and What They Do?” Public Management Review 19 (10): 1455–1479. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1287939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, A., J. M. Lewis, B. Guy Peters, and W. Voorberg. 2020. “Improving Public Policy and Administration: Exploring the Potential of Design.” Policy & Politics 48 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1332/030557319X15579230420063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa Alvarez, D. P., V. Auricchio, and Mortati, M. 2022. “Mapping Design Activities and Methods of Public Sector Innovation Units through the Policy Cycle Model.” Policy Sciences 55 (1): 89–136. doi:10.1007/s11077-022-09448-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whicher, A. 2021. “Evolution of Policy Labs and Use of Design for Policy in UK Government.” Policy Design and Practice 4 (2): 252–270. doi:10.1080/25741292.2021.1883834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Design Organization. 2021. “About World Design Capital.” Retrieved August 25 2021, https://wdo.org/programmes/wdc/about/
   Google Scholar