The design narrative in design learning: Adjusting the inertia of attention and enhancing design integrity

References

• Al-Alami, S. 2019. “Point of View in Narrative.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 9 (8): 911–916. doi:10.17507/tpls.0908.03.
   Google Scholar
• Allport, G. W. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Oxford, England: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Amso, D., and G. Scerif. 2015. “The Attentive Brain: Insights from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.” Nature Reviews 16 (10): 606–619. doi:10.1038/nrn4025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnheim, R. 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, M. 2010. Useful Fictions: Evolution, Anxiety, and the Origins of Literature. London: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behmer, S. 2005. “Literature Review Digital Storytelling: Examining the Process with Middle School Students.” In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Bouton, M. E. 2021. “Context, Attention, and the Switch between Habit and Goal-Direction in Behavior.” Learning & Behavior 49 (4): 349–362. doi:10.3758/s13420-021-00488-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, U. 2007. “Stylistics and Detective Case Study.” In Literature and Stylistics for Language Learners: Theory and Practice, edited by G. Watson, and S. Zyngier, 60–78. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1993. “A History of Design Methodology.” In Design Methodology and Relationships with Science, edited by M. J. De Vries, N. Cross, & D. P. Grant. London: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. H., B. A. Gaudiano, L. McHugh, and M. E. Levin. 2021. “Integrating Storytelling into the Theory and Practice of Contextual Behavioral Science.” Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 20: 155–162. doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2021.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emanuel, R., and S. Challons-Lipton. 2013. “Visual Literacy and the Digital Native: Another Look.” Journal of Visual Literacy 32 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1080/23796529.2013.11674703.
   Google Scholar
• Fahrenwald, C. 2011. Erzählen im Kontext neuer Lernkulturen: eine bildungstheoretische Analyse im Spannungsfeld von Wissen, Lernen und Subjekt. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. 1987. Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganoe, C. J. 1999. “Design as Narrative: A Theory of Inhabiting Interior Space.” Journal of Interior Design 25 (2): 1–15. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.1999.tb00340.x.
   Google Scholar
• Giard, J. 1999. “The Lexicon of Industrial Design: Out with the Old, in with the New.” In IDSA National Educators Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Giloi, S., and P. Du Toit. 2013. “Current Approaches to the Assessment of Graphic Design in a Higher Education Context.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 32 (2): 256–268. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01758.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., T. C. Brock, and G. F. Kaufman. 2004. “Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation into Narrative Worlds.” Communication Theory 14 (4): 311–327. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., and B. Hurwitz. 1999. “Why Study Narrative?” BMJ 318 (7175): 48–50. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7175.48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., S. Fokkinga, and I. Ocnarescu. 2013, September. “Narratives in Design: A Study of the Types, Applications and Functions of Narratives in Design Practice.” In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, D. 2004. Story Logic: Problems and Possibilities of Narrative. London: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICSID International Council of Societies of Industrial Design 2003. from the World Wide Web. Accessed 22 January 2003. http://www.icsid.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, E. Y., T. E. Belyakova, and L. V. Novikova. 2019. “Multidisciplinary Approach to the Training Designers as a Way of Systematic Thinking Formation.” Revista Espacios 40 (17): 743–751.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobus, L. 1989. Writing as Thinking. United Kingdom: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., K. L. Peck, and B. G. Wilson. 1999. Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, S. 2015. “Narrative Situation: Who’s Who and What’s Its Function.” In Narrative Form, 33–55. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. 2022. “Differences in Visual Attention of Seniors When Compared to Juniors according to the Location of Subtitles in a Video Manual.” Archives of Design Research 35 (1): 75–91. doi:10.15187/adr.2022.02.35.1.75.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. 1997. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. P., and E. Bonollo. 2002. “An Analysis of Professional Skills in Design: Implications for Education and Research.” Design Studies 23 (4): 385–406. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00003-0.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, C., C. T. Lin, S. N. Yao, W. S. Chang, Y. C. Liu, and S. A. Chen. 2017. “Visual Attention and Association: An Electroencephalography Study in Expert Designers.” Design Studies 48: 76–95. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugmayr, A., E. Sutinen, J. Suhonen, C. I. Sedano, H. Hlavacs, and C. S. Montero. 2017. “Serious Storytelling–a First Definition and Review.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 76 (14): 15707–15733. doi:10.1007/s11042-016-3865-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHale, B. 2011. “An Introduction to Narratology.” Style 45 (1): 161.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. S., and M. N. Wise. 2017. “Narrative Science and Narrative Knowing. Introduction to Special Issue on Narrative Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 62: 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Leiva, F., L. M. Faísca, C. M. Ramos, M. B. Correia, C. M. Sousa, and M. Bouhachi. 2021. “The Influence of Banner Position and User Experience on Recall. The Mediating Role of Visual Attention.” Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC 25 (1): 85–114.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. G., and E. Stolterman. 2014. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English. Language Teaching. New York: Mc Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Nurcahyo, W., N. M. Faizah, and L. Fabrianto. 2022. “Narrative Inquiry in Game Narrative Design.” Jurnal Mantik 6 (2): 1630–1640.
   Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. 2019. “The Semantic and Syntactic Qualities of Paneling in Students’ Graphic Narratives.” Visual Communication 18 (1): 55–81. doi:10.1177/1470357217740393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardiyono, M. P. 2007. Pasti Bisa Teaching Genre-Based Writing. Yogyakarta: Andi.
   Google Scholar
• Plowman, L. 1996. “Narrative, Linearity, and Interactivity: Making Sense of Interactive Multimedia.” British Journal of Educational Technology 27 (2): 92–105. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.1996.tb00716.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding, R. J., and I. Cheema. 1991. “Cognitive Styles: An Overview and Integration.” Educational Psychology 11: 193–215. doi:10.1080/0144341910110301.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. L. 2006. Narrative, Media, and Modes. M.-LR Avatars of Story, 3–30. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, D. 2010. “The Stylistics of Narrative Fiction.” In Languageand Style, edited by D. Mclntyre, and B. Busse, 225–249. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. L., S. Moriarty, K. Kenney, and Barbatsis, G. (Eds.) 2004. Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media. Milton Park: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A., and A. Namoune. 2008, February. “Getting the Message Across: Visual Attention, Aesthetic Design and What Users Remember.” In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wartofsky, M. 1980. “Cameras Can’t See: Representation, Photography, and Human Vision.” Afterimage 7 (9): 8–9. doi:10.1525/aft.1980.7.9.8.
   Google Scholar
• Whalen, J. 2019. Design for How People Think: Using Brain Science to Build Better Products. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. 1989. “Visual Thinking in the Ice Age.” Scientific American 261 (1): 92–99. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0789-92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, W. R. 2019. “Attending to the Visual Aspects of Visual Storytelling: Using Art and Design Concepts to Interpret and Compose Narratives with Images.” Journal of Visual Literacy 38 (1–2): 66–82. doi:10.1080/1051144X.2019.1569832.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, M. Norton. 2011. “Science as Historical Narrative.” Erkenntnis 75: 349–376. special issue on What Good is Historical Epistemology, eds. Uljana Feest and Thomas Sturm.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. M., and T. F. Hsu. 2017. “New Perspective on Visual Communication Design Education: An Empirical Study of Applying Narrative Theory to Graphic Design Courses.” International Journal of Higher Education 6 (2): 188–198. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p188.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M. Y., M. You, and F. C. Chen. 2005. “Competencies and Qualifications for Industrial Design Jobs: Implications for Design Practice, Education, and Student Career Guidance.” Design Studies 26 (2): 155–189. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar