Can I design for play? How pedagogues design for children’s play situations in school

References

• Akama, Y., S. Pink, and S. Sumartojo. 2018. Uncertainty and Possibility: New Approaches to Future Making in Design Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury. Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., and J. Shattuck. 2012. “Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?” Educational Researcher 41 (1): 16–25. doi:10.3102/0013189X11428813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barab, S., and K. Squire. 2004. “Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. 1972. A Theory of Play and Fantasy I Steps to an Ecological Theory of Mind. London: Aroson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bekker, T., J. Sturm, and E. Barakova. 2010. “Design for Social Interaction through Physical Play in Diverse Contexts of Use.” Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14 (5): 381–383. doi:10.1007/s00779-009-0269-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. 1992. “Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 2 (2): 141–178. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2.
   Google Scholar
• Can, E., and G. Inalhan. 2017. “Having a Voice, Having a Choice: Children’s Participation in Educational Space Design.” The Design Journal, 20 (sup1): S3238–S3251. doi:10.1080/14606925.2017.1352829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Dattner, R. 1974. Design for Play. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2008. Logic, the Theory of Enquiry. Redditch: Read Books.
   Google Scholar
• Druin, A. 2002. “The Role of Children in the Design of New Technology.” Behaviour and Information Technology 21 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/01449290110108659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feder, K. 2020. “Designing for Play with a Child-Centred Design Approach. Chap. 5.” In Framing Play Design, edited by edited by S. Gudiksen and H. M. Skovbjerg, 89–102. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M., M. Hedegaard, E. E. Ødegaard, and H. V. Sørensen, eds. 2021. Studies of Exploration in Education: Cultures of Play and Learning in Transition. London: Bloomsbury Series Transitions in Childhood and Youth.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1986. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M., and P. Atkinson. 1983. Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. 1992. “Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship, Innocenti Essay no. 4.” https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/100-childrens-participation-from-tokenism-to-citizenship.html
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks, B. E. 2011. Designing for Play. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. 1938. Homo Ludens. Kobenhavn, Norway : Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., and A. Prout. 1997. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contemporary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. J. 2016. “The Danish Pedagogue Education.” In Pathways to Professionalism in Early Childhood Education and Care, edited by M. Vandenbroeck, M. Urban, and J. Peeters, 15–29. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. C., O. Lund, O. Pedersen, and H. M. Skovbjerg. 2021. “Playful Approaches to Learning as a Realm for the Humanities in the Culture of Higher Education: A Hermeneutical Literature Review.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 21 (2): 198–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. H. 2022. “Codesign for Udvikling af Pædagogisk Legepraksis.” PhD-diss. The PhD School for The Design School Kolding and Aarhus School of Architecture, 255 p. (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. H. 2020. “Narrative Inquiry for Play Design Opportunities. Chap. 6.” In Framing Play Design, edited by S. Gudiksen and H. M. Skovbjerg, 103–114. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. H., and H. M. Skovbjerg. 2020. “Det Gjorde Sygt, Sygt Ondt.” Design Af Inkluderende Legemiljø i Skolen i Samarbejde Med Pædagoger 4 (2): 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, H. H., H. M. Skovbjerg, and M. A. Eriksen. 2021. “Approaching a DBR Model for a Research through Codesign Project on Play in Schools - to Frame Participation.” In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Design Research Conference: Nordes 2021–Matters of Scale, edited by I. E. Brandt, T. Markussen, E. Berglund, G. Julier, and P. Linde, 434–443. Kolding: Design School Kolding/Southern University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, L. 2011. “Designing for Service as One Way of Designing Services.” International Journal of Design 5 (2): 41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillemyr, O. F. 2003. “Play in School—The Teacher’s Role. Reforms and Recent Research.” In Contemporary Perspectives on Play in Early Childhood Education, edited by O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek, 53–73. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Øksnes, M. 2008. “The Carnival Goes on and on! Children’s Perceptions of Their Leisure Time and Play in SFO.” Leisure Studies 27 (2): 149–164. doi:10.1080/02614360701757140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øksnes, M., K. A. Knutas, A. Ludvigsson, C. Falkner, and B. Kjær. 2020. “Lekens rolle i skandinaviske skolefritidsordninger og fritidshjem.” BARN - Forskning om barn og barndom i Norden 32 (3): 107–123. doi:10.5324/barn.v33i3.3504.
   Google Scholar
• Page, T., and G. Thorsteinsson. 2017. “Designing Toys to Support Children’s Development.” Journal on Educational Psychology 11 (2): 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S. 2020. “A Multisensory Approach to Visual Methods.” In The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods, 523–533. London: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pursi, A., and L. Lipponen. 2018. “Constituting Play Connection with Very Young Children: Adults’ Active Participation in Play.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 17 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, J. P., M. T. Rayner, and A. C. Laidlaw. 2012. Children’s Participation in Designing landscapes–Examples from Melbourne. Melbourne: HPHP Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Salmona, M., E. Lieber, and D. Kaczynski. 2020. Qualitative and Mixed Methods. Data Analysis Using Dedoose. A Practical Approach for Research Across the Social Sciences. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sand, A.-L. 2017. “Jamming with Urban Rhythms: Improvisatorial Place-Making Among Danish Youth.” YOUNG 25 (3): 286–304. doi:10.1177/1103308816671611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sand, A.-L., J. Pløger, A. Førde, and A.-L. Sand. 2021. “Design for organisatorisk improvisation. Når borgere tager byplanlægning i egen hånd. Chap. 3.” In Improvisasjon: Byliv mellom plan og planløshet, 65–83. Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sand, A.-L., H. M. Skovbjerg, and L. Tanggaard. 2022. “Re-Thinking Research Interview Methods Through the Multisensory Constitution of Place.” Qualitative Research 22 (4): 594–612. doi:10.1177/1468794121999009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen, J., and T. Robertson, eds. 2013. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design. Vol. 711. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Skovbjerg, H. M. 2021. On Play. Copenhagen. Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Skovbjerg, H. M., T. Bekker, B. d’Anjou, J. Aakash, and K. Quionomes. 2021. “Examining Theory Use in Design Research on Fantasy Play.” Internatioanl Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 32: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Skovbjerg, H. M., and A.-L. Sand. 2022. “Play in School–Towards an Ecosystemic Understanding and Perspective.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton-Smith, B. 2001. The Ambiguity of Play. Förlag: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., and J. Sidnell. 2016. “Proposals for Activity Collaboration.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (2): 148–166. doi:10.1080/08351813.2016.1164409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonetto, L. M., A. M. Pereira, S. H. Koller, K. Bressane, and D. Pierozan. 2020. “Designing Toys and Play Activities for the Development of Social Skills in Childhood.” The Design Journal 23 (2): 199–217. doi:10.1080/14606925.2020.1717026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN. 2013. “United Nations, Convention on the Rights of the Child. Article 31.” Human Rights Office of High Commissioner. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, E., and M. Hedegaard. 2020. “Introduction to Children’s Exploration and Cultural Formation.” In Children’s Exploration and Cultural Formation. International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development, edited by M. Hedegaard and E. Ødegaard, Vol. 29, 1–10. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-030-36271-3
   Google Scholar