Picking a design, or a design team? The role of reflective practice and team learning in architecture competitions

References

• Argote, L., D. Gruenfeld, and C. Naquin. 2000. “Group Learning in Organizations.” In Groups at Work: Theory and Research, edited by M. E. Turner, 369–412. New Jersey: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., and D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, J., and L. Chiapello. 2018. “Schön’s Intellectual Legacy: A Citation Analysis of DRS Publications (2010–2016).” Design Studies 56: 205–224. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., S. W. J. Kozlowski, and S. Blawath. 2012. “Team Learning: A Theoretical Integration and Review.” In The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology, edited by S. W. J. Kozlowski, Vol. 2, 859–909. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928286.013.0026.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C. S., E. Salas, and D. Diaz. 2007. “The Role of Team Learning in Facilitating Team Adaptation Within Complex Environments: Tools and Strategies.” In Work Group Learning: Understanding, Improving and Assessing How Groups Learn in Organizations, 1st ed., 14. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cauwelier, P., V. M. Ribiere, and A. Bennet. 2019. “The Influence of Team Psychological Safety on Team Knowledge Creation: A Study with French and American Engineering Teams.” Journal of Knowledge Management 23 (6): 1157–1175. doi:10.1108/JKM-07-2018-0420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chupin, J.-P. 2011. “Judgement by Design: Towards a Model for Studying and Improving the Competition Process in Architecture and Urban Design.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 27 (1): 173–184. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2010.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. G., S. J. Edgett, and E. J. Kleinschmidt. 2002. “Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do.” Research-Technology Management 45 (5): 21–27. doi:10.1080/08956308.2002.11671518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K. W., and L. R. Weingart. 2003. “Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (4): 741–749. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., F. Dochy, and P. Van den Bossche. 2010. “Grasping the Dynamic Complexity of Team Learning: An Integrative Model for Effective Team Learning in Organisations.” Educational Research Review 5 (2): 111–133. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, A., M. S. Kleinsmann, and F. Deken. 2013. “Investigating Design Cognition in the Construction and Enactment of Team Mental Models.” Design Studies 34 (1): 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2012.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, C. H. 1997. Describing Design, a Comparison of Paradigms. Delft: University of Technology. http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:2055acc5-bdc9-4e03-a24c-332ea4f454d2.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2015. Frame Innovation: Create New Thinking by Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., and N. Cross. 2001. “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-evolution of Problem–Solution.” Design Studies 22 (5): 425–437. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. 1999. “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (2): 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. 2002. “Managing the Risk of Learning: Psychological Safety in Work Teams.” In International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working, edited by M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, and K. G. Smith, 255–275. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. doi:10.1002/9780470696712.ch13.
   Google Scholar
• Ellmers, G., S. Bennett, and I. Brown. 2014. “Design Education: Fostering the Conditions for Transfer through a Structured and Critical Approach to Reflective Practice.” In Proceedings of NordDesign 2014 Conference, edited by M. Laakso and K. Ekman, 115–123. Espoo, Finland: Aalto Design Factory.
   Google Scholar
• Geis, C., R. Bierhals, I. Schuster, P. Badke-Schaub, and H. Birkhofer. 2008. “Methods in Practice—a Study on Requirements for Development and Transfer of Design Methods.” DS 48: Proceedings DESIGN 2008, 369–376, Dubrovnik, Croatia, May 19.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. 1995. “A Multi Method Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (2): 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaipiainen, M. 2013. “Architectural Competitions in Finland.” In Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice, edited by J. E. Andersoon, G. B. Zettersten, and M. Rönn, 23–36. Sweden: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemian, R., and M. Rönn. 2009. “Finnish Architectural Competitions: structure, Criteria and Judgement Process.” Building Research & Information 37 (2): 176–186. doi:10.1080/09613210802450705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinsmann, M., F. Deken, A. Dong, and K. Lauche. 2012. “Development of Design Collaboration Skills.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (7): 485–506. doi:10.1080/09544828.2011.619499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreiner, K. 2012. “Organizational Decision Mechanisms in an Architectural Competition.” In Research in the Sociology of Organizations, edited by A. Lomi and J. R. Harrison, Vol. 36, 399–429. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X(2012)0000036018.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, K. 2018. “Architecture Competitions Made in Denmark.” In The Competition Grid: Experimenting with and within Architecture Competitions, edited by M. Theodore, and A. Katsakou, 63–70. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kreiner, K. 2020. “Pick the Winner, so You Can Then Choose the Reasons: Epistemic Dissonance in Architecture Competitions.” In The Performance Complex, edited by K. Kreiner, 31–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198861669.003.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Leentje, V. 2013. “Facing the Challenges of Organising a Competition – The Building for Bouwkunde Case.” In Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice, edited by J. E. Andersoon, G. B. Zettersten, and M. Rönn, 193–216. Sweden: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• London, M., J. T. Polzer, and H. Omoregie. 2005. “Interpersonal Congruence, Transactive Memory, and Feedback Processes: An Integrative Model of Group Learning.” Human Resource Development Review 4 (2): 114–135. doi:10.1177/1534484305275767.
   Google Scholar
• Minsky, M. 1975. “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” In The Psychology of Computer Vision, edited by P. H. Winston, 211–277. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Reymen, I. M. M. J. 2003. “Research on Design Reflection Overview and Directions.” In DS 31: Proceedings of ICED 03, the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, August 19.
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. 2009. “Judgment in the Architectural Competition – Rules, Policies and Dilemmas.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2/3): 52–67.
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. 2011. “Architectural Quality in Competitions. A Dialogue Based Assessment of Design Proposals.” FormAkademisk- Forskningstidsskrift for Design Og Designdidaktikk 4 (1). doi:10.7577/formakademisk.130.
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. 2012. “A Theory for Assessing Quality in Architecture Competitions.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research (1): 149–173.
   Google Scholar
• Rönn, M. 2013. “Experimentation within Swedish Competitions.” In Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice, edited by J. E. Andersoon, G. B. Zettersten, and M. Rönn, 71–84. Sweden: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Roozenburg, N. F. M, and K. Dorst. 1998. “Describing Design as a Reflective Practice: Observations on Schön’s Theory of Practice.” In Designers, edited by E. Frankenberger, H. Birkhofer, and P. Badke-Schaub, 29–41. London: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-1268-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Sadokierski, Z. 2020. “Developing Critical Documentation Practices for Design Researchers.” Design Studies 69: 100940. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2020.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1992. “Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation.” Knowledge-Based Systems 5 (1): 3–14. doi:10.1016/0950-7051(92)90020-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., and J. Bennett. 1996. “Reflective Conversation with Materials.” In Bringing Design to Software, edited by T. W. Winograd, 171–189. New York: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. M. 1994. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. 1st Currency paperback ed. New York: Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Sessa, V., and M. London. 2007. “Group Learning: An Introduction.” In Work Group Learning: Understanding, Improving and Assessing How Groups Learn in Organizations, 3–14. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. New York: MIT Press. doi:10.1016/S0898-1221(97)82941-0.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, R., A. M. Connor, and B. Corson. 2017. “Framing Creative Problems.” In Handbook of Research on Creative Problem-Solving Skill Development in Higher Education, edited by C. Zhou, 472–493. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0643-0.
   Google Scholar
• Stompff, G., F. Smulders, and L. Henze. 2016. “Surprises Are the Benefits: Reframing in Multidisciplinary Design Teams.” Design Studies 47: 187–214. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, J. 2013. “Prequalification in the UK and Design Team Selection Procedures.” In Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice, edited by J. E. Andersoon, G. B. Zettersten, and M. Rönn, 135–158. Sweden: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, K. 2018. “The Evolution of the UK Competition System.” In The Competition Grid: Experimenting with and within Architecture Competitions, edited by M. Theodore and A. Katsakou, 13–31. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf, S. C., and J. T. McDonnell. 2002. “Talking about Team Framing: Using Argumentation to Analyse and Support Experiential Learning in Early Design Episodes.” Design Studies 23 (1): 5–23. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00020-5.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, C. 2009. “Speaking of Architecture: A Study of the Jury's Assessment in an Invited Competition.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 21 (2/3): 94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, C. 2012. “Architectural Persuasion: On Quality Assessment in an Architectural Competition.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research (1): 97–118.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, C. 2013. “Inside the Jury Room: Strategies of Quality Assessment in Swedish Architectural Competitions.” In Architectural Competitions—Histories and Practice, edited by J. E. Andersoon, G. B. Zettersten, and M. Rönn, 249–260. Sweden: Rio Kulturkooperativ.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L. 2020. “Behaviours in Design Collaborations: Insights from a Team Learning Perspective.” In Proceedings of the Design Research Society 2020 Conference: Synergy. Design Research Society 2020, Brisbane, August 11. doi:10.21606/drs.2020.330.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L. 2021a. “Collaborative Cultures of Architecture Teams: Team Learning and Reflective Practice.” The Design Journal 24 (3): 489–498. doi:10.1080/14606925.2020.1864942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L. 2021b. “From Reflective Practitioner to Learning Professionals: The Role of Reflecting and Learning in Architecture Teams.” Swinburne University of Technology. https://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/items/e20941a5-21e3-4bfb-ab32-2a280e8b2823/1/
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L., A. Kocsis, and J. Burry. 2023. “Advancing Donald Schön’s Reflective Practitioner: Where to Next?” Design Issues 23 (3): 3–18. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00722.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, L., A. Kocsis, J. Burry, and E. Kyndt. 2023. “Performance of Architectural Teams.” Design Studies. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2023.101190.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, R., and K. Dorst. 1998. “The Reflective Practice of Design Teams.” Design Studies 19 (3): 249–271. doi:10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00011-8.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bossche, P., W. H. Gijselaers, M. Segers, and P. A. Kirschner. 2006. “Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments: Team Learning Beliefs and Behaviors.” Small Group Research 37 (5): 490–521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bossche, P., W. Gijselaers, M. Segers, G. Woltjer, and P. Kirschner. 2011. “Team Learning: Building Shared Mental Models.” Instructional Science 39 (3): 283–301. doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., F. Dochy, and E. Raes. 2016. “Team Learning in Teacher Teams: Team Entitativity as a Bridge Between Teams-in-Theory and Teams-in-Practice.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 31 (3): 275–298. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0279-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volker, L., and M. Bos-de Vos. 2018. “Managerial Practices in Dutch Competitions and the Impact on Architects.” In The Competition Grid: Experimenting with and within Architecture Competitions, edited by M. Theodore, and A. Katsakou, 85–92. London: RIBA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weixelbaum, I., P. Badke-Schaub, and D. Dörner. 2013. “Training for Reflective Competency in Design Teams: An Empirical Study.” In DS 75-7: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13) Design for Harmonies, 49–58, Seoul, Korea, August 19.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (Sixth edition). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar