Using actor–network theory to revisit the digitalized tool in social design

References

• Ballantyne, Neil. 2015. “Human Service Technology and the Theory of the Actor Network.” Journal of Technology in Human Services 33 (1): 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2014.998567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buwert, P. 2017. “Potentiality: The Ethical Foundation of Design.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S4459–S4467. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chick, Anne. 2012. “Design for Social Innovation: Emerging Principles and Approaches.” Iridescent 2 (1): 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/19235003.2012.11428505
   Google Scholar
• Conole, Gràinne. 2009. “The Role of Mediating Artefacts in Learning Design.” In Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies, edited by Lorie Lockyer, Sue Bennett, Shirley Agostinho, and Barry Harper, 188–208. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, Carl, and J. Lukens. 2011. “Nonanthropocentrism and the Nonhuman in Design: Possibilities for Design New Forms of Engagement with and through Technology.” In From Social Butterfly to Engaged Citizen: Urban Informatics, Social Media, Ubiquitous Computing, and Mobile Technology to Support Citizen Engagement, edited by Marcus Foth, Laura Folano, Christine Satchell, and Martin Gibbs, 421–436. London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8744.003.0034
   Google Scholar
• Ely, Philip. 2020. “Designing Futures for an Age of Differentialism.” Design and Culture 12 (3): 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2020.1810907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürdere Akdur, Selin, and Harun Kaygan. 2019. “Social Design in Turkey through a Survey of Design Media: Projects, Objectives, Participation Approaches.” The Design Journal 22 (1): 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1560592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsall, Francis. 2016. “Actor-Network Aesthetics: The Conceptual Rhymes of Bruno Latour and Contemporary Art.” New Literary History 47 (2–3): 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.2016.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janzer, Cinnamon L., and Lauren S. Weinstein. 2014. “Social Design and Neocolonialism.” Design and Culture 6 (3): 327–343. https://doi.org/10.2752/175613114X14105155617429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefi, Hajer, and Jessie Pallud. 2011. “The Role of Technologies in Cultural Mediation in Museums: An Actor-Network Theory View Applied in France.” Museum Management and Curatorship 26 (3): 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2011.585803
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Hwan-Suk. 2017. Posthumanism and the Transformation of Civilization: Is a New Human Being Possible? 포스트 휴머니즘과 문명의 전화 새로운 인간은 가능한가? Gwangju, South Korean: GIST Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1991. Nous N'avons Jamais Été Modernes: Essaid’anthropologie Symetrique. Paris: La Decouverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale Welt 4: 369–381.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• López, Verónica, Vicente Sisto, Enrique Baleriola, Antonio García, Claudia Carrasco, Carmen Gloria Núñez, and René Valdés. 2021. “A Struggle for Translation: An Actor-Network Analysis of Chilean School Violence and School Climate Policies.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 49 (1): 164–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143219880328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, Deborah. 2018. “Towards Design Sociology.” Sociology Compass 12 (1): e12546. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, Mike. 2017. Actor-Network Theory: Trials, Trails and Translations. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Family Planning Commission. 2020. No. 22. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-12/10/content_5568777.htm
   Google Scholar
• Rice, Louis. 2018. “Nonhumans in Participatory Design.” CoDesign 14 (3): 238–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1316409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Yvonne, and Laura Tate. 2016. Actor Networks of Planning: Exploring the Influence of Actor Network Theory. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. 1997. “Actor-Network Theory and is Research: Current Status and Future Prospects.” In Information Systems and Qualitative Research, edited by Allen S. Lee, Jonathan Liebenau, and Janice I. DeGross, 466–480. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wynn, Thomas. 2002. “Tools and Tool Behavior.” In Companion Encyclopedia of Anthropology, edited by Tim Ingold, 133–161. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, Albena. 2009. “Making the Social Hold: Towards an Actor-Network Theory of Design.” Design and Culture 1 (3): 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2009.11643291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar