Obstacles, Solutions and Creative Agencies: How Forces and Agencies Shape the Learning Process of Weaving

References

• Aktaş, B. M. 2020. “Entangled Fibres – An Examination of Human-Material Interaction.” Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, B. M., and C. Groth. 2020. “Studying Material Interactions to Facilitate a Sense of Being with the World.” In Design Research Society Biannual Conference, Australia, November 14.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, Ronald. 2004. “Learning for an Unknown Future.” Higher Education Research & Development 23 (3): 247–260.
   Google Scholar
• Barritt, L., S. Thompson, and M. Woodward. 2021. “(Re) considering Pedagogy–Entangled Ontology in a Complex Age: Abstraction Pedagogy and the Critical Pedagogical Importance of Art Education for Other Discipline Areas.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 40 (4): 784–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binkley, M., O. Erstad, J. Herman, M. Ripley, M. Miller-Ricci, M. Rumble. 2012. “Defining Twenty-First Century Skills.” In Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, edited by E. Care, P. Griffin, and B. McGaw, 17–66. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2012. “Thematic Analysis.” In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2. Research Designs, 57–71. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• de Gier, N. 2017. “A Conversation with Material.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S745–S753. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1353021
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 2004. A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., and N. Cross. 2001. “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem–Solution.” Design Studies 22 (5): 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103 (4): 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, Tara, and Marianne Nerland. 2014. “Introduction: Sociomaterial Professional Knowing, Work Arrangements and Responsibility. New Times, New Concepts?” In Reconceptualising Professional Learning. Sociomaterial Knowledges, Practices and Responsibilities, edited by Tara Fenwick and Marianne Nerland, 1–8. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, Tara, Marianne Nerland, and Karen Jensen. 2012. “Sociomaterial Approaches to Conceptualising Professional Learning and Practice.” Journal of Education and Work 25 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644901
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, Tara. 2015. “Sociomateriality and Learning: A Critical Approach.” In The SAGE Handbook of Learning, edited by David Scott and Eleanore Hargreaves, 83–93. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gelmez, Kerim, and Tuğba E. Tüfek. 2022. “Locating Writing in Design Education as a Pedagogical Asset.” The Design Journal 25 (4): 675–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2088174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, K., and P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen. 2022. “Learning by Inventing: Theoretical Foundations.” In Invention Pedagogy: The Finnish Approach to Maker Education, edited by Tiina Korhonen, Kaiju Kangas, and Laura Salo, 15–27. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2000. The Perception of the Environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2010. “Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials.” Realities Working Papers 15: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M. 2007. “Knowing through Making: The Role of the Artefact in Practice-Led Research.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20 (3): 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9028-2
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M. 2019. “A Nourishing Dialogue with the Material Environment.” In Design & Nature: A Partnership, edited by Kate Fletcher, Louise St Pierre, and Mathilda Tham, 173–178. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M., and B. M. Aktaş. 2023. “Learning with the Natural Environment: How Walking with Nature Can Actively Shape Creativity and Contribute to Holistic Learning.” International Journal of Art & Design Education 42 (1): 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omwami, A., H. Lahti, and P. Seitamaa-Hakkarainen. 2020. “The Variation of the Idea Development Process in Apparel Design: A Multiple Case Study.” International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education 13 (3): 341–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1817573
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, Andrew. 1993. “The Mangle of Practice: Agency and Emergence in the Sociology of Science.” American Journal of Sociology 99 (3): 559–589. https://doi.org/10.1086/230316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. Keith. 2019. “The Role of Failure in Learning How to Create.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 33: 100527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. 2022. “Creative Expansion of Knowledge-Creating Learning.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 31 (1): 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2022.2029105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, K., X. Zhang, and A. Konopasky. 2022. “Strategic Shifts: How Studio Teachers Use Direction and Support to Build Learner Agency in the Figured World of Visual Art.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 31 (1): 14–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1999817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., D. Song, and R. He. 2018. “Re-Examining ‘Learning by Doing’: Implications from Learning Style Migration.” The Design Journal 21 (3): 313–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2018.1444126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar