Publication Cover
The Design Journal
An International Journal for All Aspects of Design
Volume 27, 2024 - Issue 3
173
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The ‘right’ place to age? Exploring age-friendly and diversity-sensitive design in a super-diverse neighbourhood

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 533-555 | Received 25 Jul 2023, Accepted 27 Mar 2024, Published online: 12 Apr 2024

References

  • Boccagni, Paolo. 2017. “Migration and the Search for Home: Mapping Domestic Space in Migrants’ Everyday Lives.” In Mobility & Politics. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Carroll, Sidse, Astrid Pernille Jespersen, and Jens Troelsen. 2020. “Going along with Older People: Exploring Age-Friendly Neighbourhood Design through Their Lens.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 35 (2): 555–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09700-z.
  • De Carli, Beatrice, and Alexandre Apsan Frediani. 2021. “Situated Perspectives on the City: A Reflection on Scaling Participation through Design.” Environment and Urbanization 33 (2): 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478211028066.
  • EAAE 2012. ‘Charter for Architectural Research, a Declaration and a Framework on Architectural Research’. European Association for Architectural Education. 2012. http://www.eaae.be/about/statutes-and-charter/eaae-charter-architectural-research/.
  • Evans, James, and Phil Jones. 2011. “The Walking Interview: Methodology, Mobility and Place.” Applied Geography 31 (2): 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005.
  • Fernández-Carro, Celia. 2016. “Ageing at Home, Co-Residence or Institutionalisation? Preferred Care and Residential Arrangements of Older Adults in Spain.” Ageing and Society 36 (3): 586–612. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1400138X.
  • Gilroy, Rose. 2008. “Places That Support Human Flourishing: Lessons from Later Life: Planning Theory & Practice.” Planning Theory & Practice 9 (2): 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350802041548.
  • Gilroy, Rose. 2021. “Planning for an Ageing Society.” In Concise Guides to Planning. London: Lund Humphries.
  • Golant, Stephen M. 2011. “The Quest for Residential Normalcy by Older Adults: Relocation but One Pathway.” Journal of Aging Studies 25 (3): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2011.03.003.
  • Golant, Stephen M. 2015. “Residential Normalcy and the Enriched Coping Repertoires of Successfully Aging Older Adults.” The Gerontologist 55 (1): 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu036.
  • Haacke, Hannah, and Tobia Lakes. 2017. ‘Super-Diversity and Urban Development – Challenges and Possibilities of Simulating Future Scenarios for the Case of Berlin, Germany’. In. Leeds.
  • Hadjiyanni, Tasoulla. 2009. “Sacred Places: Culturally Sensitive Housing Designs for Hmong and Somali Refugees.” Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences; Alexandria 101 (1): 30–35.
  • Heynen, Hilde. 2013. “Space as Receptor, Instrument or Stage: Notes on the Interaction between Spatial and Social Constellations.” International Planning Studies 18 (3–4): 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2013.833729.
  • King, Russell, Aija Lulle, Dora Sampaio, and Julie Vullnetari. 2017. “Unpacking the Ageing–Migration Nexus and Challenging the Vulnerability Trope.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (2): 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1238904.
  • Lewis, Camilla, Mark Hammond, Niamh Kavanagh, Christopher Phillipson, and Sophie Yarker. 2020. “Developing Age-Friendly Communities in the Northern Gateway Regeneration Project.”
  • Luciano, Adriana, Federica Pascale, Francesco Polverino, and Alison Pooley. 2020. “Measuring Age-Friendly Housing: A Framework.” Sustainability 12 (3): 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030848.
  • McGinley, Chris, Jeremy Myerson, Gerard Briscoe, and Sidse Carroll. 2022. “Towards an Age-Friendly Design Lens.” Journal of Population Ageing 15 (2): 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-022-09367-5.
  • Merz, Eva-Maria, and Oliver Huxhold. 2010. “Wellbeing Depends on Social Relationship Characteristics: Comparing Different Types and Providers of Support to Older Adults.” Ageing and Society 30 (5): 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000061.
  • Miaskiewicz, Tomasz, and Kenneth A. Kozar. 2011. “Personas and User-Centered Design: How Can Personas Benefit Product Design Processes?” Design Studies 32 (5): 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.03.003.
  • Mulliner, Emma, Mike Riley, and Vida Maliene. 2020. “Older People’s Preferences for Housing and Environment Characteristics.” Sustainability 12 (14): 5723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145723.
  • Neal, Sarah, Katy Bennett, Hannah Jones, Allan Cochrane, and Giles Mohan. 2015. “Multiculture and Public Parks: Researching Super‐Diversity and Attachment in Public Green Space.” Population, Space and Place 21 (5): 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1910.
  • Oswald, Frank, Daniela Jopp, Christoph Rott, and Hans-Werner Wahl. 2011. “Is Aging in Place a Resource for or Risk to Life Satisfaction?” The Gerontologist 51 (2): 238–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnq096.
  • Park, Julia, and Jeremy Porteus. 2019. Age-Friendly Housing: Future Design for Older People. 1st ed. Portland Place, London: RIBA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429345920.
  • Pemberton, Simon. 2017. “Urban Planning and the Challenge of Super-Diversity.” Policy & Politics 45 (4): 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14755958613727.
  • Pemberton, Simon, and Jenny Phillimore. 2018. “Migrant Place-Making in Super-Diverse Neighbourhoods: Moving beyond Ethno-National Approaches.” Urban Studies 55 (4): 733–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016656988.
  • Phlix, Micheline, Ann Petermans, An-Sofie Smetcoren, and Jan Vanrie. 2023. “The Happy Home: Ageing, Migration, and Housing in Relation to Older Migrants’ Subjective Wellbeing.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20 (1): 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010106.
  • Pollastri, Serena, Christopher Boyko, Rachel Cooper, Nick Dunn, Stephen Clune, and Claire Coulton. 2017. “Envisioning Urban Futures: From Narratives to Composites.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S4365–S4377. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352933.
  • Provincies.incijfers.be. 2022. “Nationality and Origin/Neigbhourhood Level – Kolderbos (Genk).” 2022. https://provincies.incijfers.be/dashboard/dashboard/nationaliteit-en-herkomst-wijkniveau.
  • Rémillard-Boilard, Samuèle, Tine Buffel, and Chris Phillipson. 2021. “Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Eleven Case Studies from around the World.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18 (1): 133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010133.
  • Rogers, Wendy A., Widya A. Ramadhani, and Maurita T. Harris. 2020. “Defining Aging in Place: The Intersectionality of Space, Person, and Time.” Innovation in Aging 4 (4): igaa036. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa036.
  • Roggema, Rob. 2017. “Research by Design: Proposition for a Methodological Approach.” Urban Science 1 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1010002.
  • ROSEnet 2020. ‘Multidimensional Social Exclusion in Later Life: Briefing Paper and a Roadmap for Future Collaborations in Research and Policy.’ 6. Reducing Old-Age Exclusion: Collaborations in Research and Policy. 978-1-908358-76-9.
  • Rugel, Emily J., Clara K. Chow, Daniel J. Corsi, Perry Hystad, Sumathy Rangarajan, Salim Yusuf, and Scott A. Lear. 2022. “Developing Indicators of Age-Friendly Neighbourhood Environments for Urban and Rural Communities across 20 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries.” BMC Public Health 22 (1): 87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12438-5.
  • Sampaio, Dora, Russell King, and Katie Walsh. 2018. “Geographies of the Ageing-Migration Nexus: An Introduction.” Area 50 (4): 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12463.
  • Smetcoren, An-Sofie. 2016. “I’m Not Leaving!?” Critical Perspectives on ‘Ageing in Place’. Brussels: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
  • Spalt, Elizabeth W., Cynthia L. Curl, Ryan W. Allen, Martin Cohen, Sara D. Adar, Karen H. Stukovsky, Ed Avol, et al. 2016. “Time–Location Patterns of a Diverse Population of Older Adults: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air).” Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 26 (4): 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2015.29.
  • Statbel 2021. “Population of Foreign Origin.” 2021. https://provincies.incijfers.be/dashboard/nationaliteit-en-herkomst?regionlevel=gemeente&regioncode=73001&project=limburg_dashboard.
  • Stevens, Ruth, Ann Petermans, and Jan Vanrie. 2019a. “Design for Human Flourishing in Architecture: A Theoretical Framework to Design Spatial Flourishing Affordances.” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 36 (2): 129–148.
  • Stevens, Ruth, Ann Petermans, and Jan Vanrie. 2019b. “Design for Human Flourishing: A Novel Design Approach for a More “Humane” Architecture.” The Design Journal 22 (4): 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1612574.
  • Stevens, Ruth, Ann Petermans, and Jan Vanrie. 2021. “A Human-Centred Strategy Explicating and Designing Hidden Programs in Architectural Design.” Nordic Journal of Architectural Research 33 (2): 13–40.
  • Stevens, Ruth. 2018. “A Launchpad for Design for Human Flourishing in Architecture: Theoretical Foundations, Practical Guidance and a Design Tool.” Doctoral dissertation, Hasselt University.
  • Talen, Emily, and Sungduck Lee. 2018. Design for Social Diversity. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315442846.
  • Torres, Sandra. 2015. “Expanding the Gerontological Imagination on Ethnicity: Conceptual and Theoretical Perspectives.” Ageing and Society 35 (5): 935–960. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001330.
  • Vertovec 2022. Superdiversity: Migration and Social Complexity. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203503577.
  • Vertovec, Steven. 2007. “Super-Diversity and Its Implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30 (6): 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465.
  • Vidovičová, Lucie, and Isabelle Tournier. 2020. ‘Community and Spatial Aspects of Exclusion in Later Life’. 2. Reducing Old-Age Exclusion: Collaborations in Research and Policy. ROSEnet. 978-1-908358-72-1.
  • Vos, De., and Dirk Geldof. 2019. ‘The Layered Threshold as a Mediating Figure in the Homes of Migrants and Newcomers. Towards a Diversity-Sensitive Design.’ In. Brussels.
  • Weijer, Marijn van de, Koenraad Van Cleempoel, and Hilde Heynen. 2014. “Positioning Research and Design in Academia and Practice: A Contribution to a Continuing Debate.” Design Issues 30 (2): 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00259.
  • White, Stefan, and Mark Hammond. 2018. “From Representation to Active Ageing in a Manchester Neighbourhood: Designing the Age-Friendly City.” In Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: A Global Perspective, edited by Chris Phillipson, S Handler, and Tine Buffel, 193–210. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • World Health Organization 2023. “National Programmes for Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: A Guide.” Geneva.
  • World Health Organization. 2007. ‘Global Age-Friendly Cities: A Guide’. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ubhasselt/detail.action?docID=329004.
  • World Health Organization. 2015. World Report on Ageing and Health. Geneva: WHO.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.