853
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

‘Devoir de mémoire’: The post-colonial path of a post-national memory in France

A study of the development of the ‘Taubira law’Footnote

Pages 239-256 | Received 29 Oct 2011, Accepted 16 Jan 2013, Published online: 18 Mar 2013

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
  • Barcellini, S. (2009). L'Etat républicain, acteur de mémoire: Des morts pour la France aux morts à cause de la France [Republican State as memory entrepreneur. From ‘died for France’ to ‘died because of France’]. In P. Blanchard & I. Veyrat Masson (Eds.), Les Guerres de mémoires [Memories wars] (pp. 209–219). Paris: La Découverte.
  • Bernabé, J., Chamoiseau, P., & Confiant, R. (1989). éloge de la créolité [In praise of creolness]. Paris: Gallimard.
  • Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The postcolonial and the postmodern. The question of agency. In The location of culture (p. 169–202). London: Routledge.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). La paysannerie, une classe objet [Peasantery, a class object]. Actes de la Recherche en sciences sociales, 17, 18, 2–5.
  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Routledge.
  • Chivallon, Ch. (2010). Mémoire de l'esclavage et actualisation des rapports sociaux [Slavery memory and updating of social relations]. In M. Cottias, E. Cunin, & A. de Almeida Mendes (Eds.), Les Traites et les esclavages. Perspectives historiques et contemporaines [Treaties and slavery. Historical and contemporary perspectives] (pp. 335–355). Paris: Karthala et Ciresc.
  • Citron, S. (2008). Le mythe national. L‘Atelier en poche [The national myth, L‘Atelier en poche]. re-published, Paris: Éditions de l‘Atelier.
  • Conan, E., & Rousso, H. (2001). Vichy, un passé qui ne passe pas [Vichy: an ever-present past], re-published, Paris: Gallimard, coll., Folio-histoire.
  • Giraud, M. (2007). Le malheur d'être partis. [The misfortune to be left]. Esprit, 20(2), 49–61. doi: 10.3917/espri.0702.0049
  • Glissant, É. (1981). Le Discours antillais [Caribbean discourse]. Paris: Seuil.
  • Lavabre, M-C. (2007). Paradigmes de la mémoire [Memory paradigms]. Transcontinentales, 5, 2e semestre, 139–147.
  • Ledoux, S. Pour une généalogie du ‘devoir de mémoire’ en France. Centre Alberto Benveniste EPHE-Sorbonne [For a genealogy of ‘devoir de mémoire’ in France. Centre Alberto Benveniste EPHE-Sorbonne]. Retrieved February, 2009, from http://centrealbertobenveniste.org/formail-cab/uploads/Pour-une-genealogie-du%20devoir-de-memoire-Ledoux.pdf
  • Ledoux, S. (2011). L'esclavage, objet scolaire polysémique [Slavery: a school polysemical object]. Cartable de Clio, 11, 241–247.
  • Ledoux, S. (2012). Écrire une histoire du ‘devoir de mémoire’ [Write a history of ‘devoir de mémoire’]. Le Débat, 170, 175–185.
  • Lefranc, S., & Mathieu, L. (Eds.). (2008). La Mobilisation des victimes [Mobilization victims]. Rennes: PUR, coll., Res Publica.
  • Maingueneau, D. (1987). Nouvelles tendances en analyse du discours [Newtrends in discourse analysis]. Paris: Hachette.
  • Michel, J. (2010). Gouverner les mémoires [Govern the memories]. Paris: PUF.
  • Offenstadt, N., Wanish, S., & De Cock, L. (Eds.). (2008). Comment Nicolas Sarkozy écrit l'histoire de France [How Nicolas Sarkozy writes the history of France]. Marseille: Agone.
  • Ricœur, P. (1998). Vulnérabilité de la mémoire [Vulnerability of memory]. In J. Le Goff (Ed.), Patrimoine et passions identitaires, Actes des Entretiens du Patrimoine [Heritage and identities passions, Actes des Entretiens du Patrimoine] (pp. 17–31). Paris: Fayard.
  • Rioux, J.P. (2006). La France perd la mémoire [France loses memory]. Paris: Perrin.
  • Rothberg, M. (2009). Multidirectional memory. Remembering the holocaust in the age of decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 5.
  • Said, E. (1990). Third World intellectuals and metropolitan culture. Raritan, 9(3), 49.
  • Saïd, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
  • Siméant, J. (2010). La transnationalisation de l'action collective [Transnationalization of collective action]. In O. Fillieule, E. Agrikoliansky, & I. Sommier (Eds.), Penser les mouvements sociaux [Thinking about social movements] (pp. 121–144). Paris: La Découverte.
  • Spivak, G. Ch. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and interpretation of culture (pp. 273–313). Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
  • Thiesse, A-M. (2001). La Création des identités nationales [The creation of national identities]. Paris: Seuil, coll., Points-Histoire.
  • Wieviorka, O. (2010). La Mémoire désunie [Divided memory. French recollections of World War II from the liberation to the present], Paris: Seuil, coll., L'univers historique.
  • Zander, U. (2004). Promotion et reconnaissance du 22 mai en Martinique. Historique d'une lutte pour le droit à la mémoire [Recognition of 22 May in Martinique. History of The struggle for the right of memory]. In EHESS (Ed.), Transmission, mémoire, histoire. Paris: EHESS. Retrieved 18 April 2008, from http://www.gensdelacaraibe.org/recherche/articles.php

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.