Evaluating the quality of posthuman music education research: diffracting quality criteria through response-ability

References

• Armstrong McKay, David I., Arie Staal, Jesse F. Abrams, Ricarda Winkelmann, Boris Sakschewski, Sina Loriani, Ingo Fetzer, Sarah E. Cornell, Johan Rockström, and Timothy M. Lenton. 2022. “Exceeding 1.5°C Global Warming Could Trigger Multiple Climate Tipping Points.” Science 377 (1171): eabn7950. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aspers, Patrik, and Ugo Corte. 2019. “What Is Qualitative in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Sociology 42 (2): 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astudillo, Miguel F., and Hessam Azarijafari. 2018. “Estimating the Global Warming Emissions of the LCAXVII Conference: Connecting Flights Matter.” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 23 (7): 1512–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1479-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2012. “On Touching – The Inhuman That Therefore I Am.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 23 (3): 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-1892943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2014. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax 20 (3): 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen, and Daniela Gandorfer. 2021. “Political Desirings: Yearnings for Mattering (,) Differently.” Theory & Event 24 (1): 14–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2021.0002.
   Google Scholar
• Bousema, Teun, Prashanth Selvaraj, Abdoulaye A. Djimde, Derya Yakar, Brittany Hagedorn, Abigail Pratt, Didier Barret, Kate Whitfield, and Justin M. Cohen. 2020. “Reducing the Carbon Footprint of Academic Conferences: The Example of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 103 (5): 1758–1761. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, Matt, and Kyle Devine. 2020. “The Cost of Music.” Popular Music 39 (1): 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261143019000552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker-Anthony, Courtney, and Roland W. Herzog. 2023. “Distortion of Journal Impact Factors in the Era of Paper Mills.” Molecular Therapy 31 (6): 1503–1504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2023.05.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, Svend. 2017. “Humanism After Posthumanism: Or Qualitative Psychology After the “Posts”.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 14 (2): 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1282568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K., and Michael D. Giardina. 2016. “Introduction: Qualitative Inquiry Through a Critical Lens.” In In Qualitative Inquiry Through a Critical Lens, edited by Norman K. Denzin, and Michael D. Giardina, 1–16. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, Laura L., and Patty Sotirin. 2020. “Data Engagement: A Critical Materialist Framework for Making Data in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 26 (7): 817–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419846639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, Magne I. 2021. “Music Education as Craft: Reframing a Rationale.” In Music Education as Craft, edited by Kari Holdhus, Regina Murphy, and Magne I. Espeland, 219–239. Landscapes: The Arts, Aesthetics, and Education; Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67704-6_17.
   Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad, Mari Ystanes. 2023. Knots of Knowing-in-Playing: Stories from Violin Lessons Read Diffractively through Agential Realism’. PhD diss., Oslo: Norwegian Academy of Music.
   Google Scholar
• Hammersley, Martyn. 2007. “The Issue of Quality in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30 (3): 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270701614782.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies, edited by Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula Treichler, 295–337. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 1994. “A Game of Cat’s Cradle: Science Studies, Feminist Theory, Cultural Studies.” Configurations 2 (1): 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 2018. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium: FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hauen, Mali, and Monica Klungland. 2023. ““Trembling Moments”: To Develop Methods for Co-Creating Data with Pupils in the Kulturskole.” Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology 14 (1): 59–81. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.5031.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Alecia Y., and Lisa A. Mazzei. 2022. Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research. 2nd ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315667768
   Google Scholar
• Jenssen, Runa Hestad. 2021. “Facing the Soprano: Uncovering a Feminist Performative “I” Through Autoethnography.” In Higher Education as Context for Music Pedagogy Research, edited by Elin Angelo, Jens Knigge, Morten Sæther, and Wenche Waagen, 113–135. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk. https://doi.org/10.23865/noasp.119.ch5.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, Mirka, and Gaile S. Cannella. 2017. “Critical Qualitative Inquiry: Histories, Methodologies, and Possibilities.” International Review of Qualitative Research 10 (4): 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2017.10.4.327.
   Google Scholar
• Kuby, Candace R., and Vivienne Bozalek. 2024. “Opening Commentary to the Special Issue “Becoming ‘Bad Researchers’: Putting Affect Theories to Work as Ethical Processes of Disruption”.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 37 (3): 613–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2023.2299004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvile, Synnøve, and Catharina Christophersen. 2023. “Recognising Intra-Actions of Music and Pupil.” Music Education Research 25 (2): 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2023.2193204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, Patti. 2016. “Top Ten+ List: (re) Thinking Ontology in (Post) Qualitative Research.” Cultural Studies <—> Critical Methodologies 16 (2): 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616634734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., and Egon G. Guba. 2007. “But Is It Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation.” New Directions for Evaluation 2007 (114): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223.
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, Maggie. 2010. “The Offence of Theory.” Journal of Education Policy 25 (2): 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903462316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLure, Maggie. 2017. “Qualitative Methodology and the New Materialisms: “a Little of Dionysus’s Blood”?” In Qualitative Inquiry in Neoliberal Times, edited by Norman K. Denzin, and Michael D. Giardina, 48–58. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matsunobu, Koji, and Liora Bresler. 2014. “Qualitative Research in Music Education: Concepts, Goals and Characteristics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research in American Music Education, edited by Colleen M. Conway, 1st ed., 2–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, Jayne, and Victoria de Rijke. 2023. “What Can a Method of Scribbling-Scrabbling with Le Guin’s Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction Offer Conceptualisations of “The Child” in the Anthropocene?” In Children’s Cultures After Childhood, edited by Justyna Deszcz-Tryhubczak, and Macarena García-González, 152–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, Scott L., and Jerry Lee Rosiek. 2023. “The Logic of Posthuman Inquiry: Affirmative Politics, Validity, and Futurities.” Qualitative Inquiry 29 (8–9): 897–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231162075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat, Seema, and Sanjay Meena. 2014. “Publish or Perish: Where Are We Heading?” Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 19 (2): 87–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shefer, Tamara, Michalinos Zembylas, and Vivienne Bozalek. 2023. “Re-Viewing Peer Reviewing: Towards an Affirmative Scholarship.” Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South (SOTL) 7 (1): 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, Norman A., and James R. King. 2020. “Expanding Approaches for Research: Understanding and Using Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Developmental Education 44 (1): 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2011. “Post Qualitative Research: The Critique and the Coming After.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin, and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 4th ed., 611–635. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2014. “A Brief and Personal History of Post Qualitative Research Toward “Post Inquiry”.” Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 30 (2).
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2019a. “Post Qualitative Inquiry in an Ontology of Immanence.” Qualitative Inquiry 25 (1): 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418772634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2019b. “Post Qualitative Inquiry, the Refusal of Method, and the Risk of the New.” Qualitative Inquiry 27 (1): 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419863005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, Elizabeth Adams. 2021. “The Lure of the New and the Hold of the Dogmatic.” Qualitative Inquiry 27 (5): 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800420939133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, Sarah J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, Sarah J., and Margaret M. Hinrichs. 2017. “Big Tent Criteria for Qualitative Quality.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by Jörg Matthes, Christine S. Davis, and Robert F. Potter, 1st ed., 1–10. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0016.
   Google Scholar
• Trinh, Minh-ha. 1997. “Not You/Like You: Post-Colonial Women and the Interlocking Questions of Identity and Difference.” In In Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives, edited by Anne McClintock, Aamir Mufti, and Ella Shohat, 415–149. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, Drishti. 2022. “Criteria for Good Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Review.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 31 (6): 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00619-0.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman Nilsson, Marie-Helene, Carina Borgström Källén, and Cecilia Ferm Almqvist. 2022. “Gender-Equal Options for Musical Becomings in the Future Music Classroom: A Pilot Study Exploring “Thinking Outside the Box”.” International Journal of Education & the Arts 23 (15): 2–19. https://doi.org/10.26209/IJEA23N15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar