International development projects by non-governmental organizations: an evaluation of the need for specific project management and appraisal tools

References

• AhlemannF, TeutebergF, VogelsangK. 2009. Project management standards – diffusion and application in Germany and Switzerland. Int J Project Manage. 27:292–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhsanK, GunawanI. 2010. Analysis of cost and schedule performance of international development projects. Int J Project Manage. 28:68–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaumWC. 1970. The project cycle. Financ Dev. 7:2–13.
   Google Scholar
• BeckerHA, VanclayF. 2003. The international handbook of social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• BesnerC, HobbsB. 2008. Project management practice, generic or contextual: a reality check. Project Manage J. 39:16–33.
   Google Scholar
• BiggsS, SmithS. 2003. A paradox of learning in project cycle management and the role of organizational culture. World Dev. 31:1743–1757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrownLD, KalegaonkarA. 2002. Support organizations and the evolution of the NGO sector. Nonprofit Voluntary Sect Quart. 31(2):231–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanEHW, RaymondYC. 2003. Cultural considerations in international construction contracts. J Constr Eng Manage. 129(4):375–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColemanG. 1987. Logical framework approach to the monitoring and evaluation of agricultural and rural development projects. Project Appraisal. 2:251–259.
   Google Scholar
• CouillardJ, GaronS, RiznicJ. 2009. The logical framework approach – millennium. Project Manage J. 40:31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CrawfordL, PollackJ. 2004. Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. Int J Project Manage. 22:645–653.
   Google Scholar
• CrawfordP, BryceP. 2003. Project monitoring and evaluation: a method for enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of aid project implementation. Int J Project Manage. 21:363–373.
   Google Scholar
• DialloA, ThuillierD. 2004. The success dimensions of international development projects: the perceptions of African project coordinators. Int J Project Manage. 22:19–31.
   Google Scholar
• DialloA, ThuillierD. 2005. The success of international development projects, trust and communication: an African perspective. Int J Project Manage. 23:237–252.
   Google Scholar
• EbrahimA. 2003a. Accountability in practice: mechanisms for NGOs. World Dev. 31:813–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EbrahimA. 2003b. Making sense of accountability: conceptual perspectives for northern and southern nonprofits. Nonprofit Manage Leadership. 14:191–212.
   Google Scholar
• FlynnBB, SaladinB. 2006. Relevance of Baldrige constructs in an international context: a study of national culture. J Oper Manage. 24:583–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GasperD. 2000. Evaluating the ‘logical framework approach' towards learning oriented development evaluation. Public Admin Dev. 20:17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper DR. 1997. Logical frameworks: a critical assessment: managerial theory, pluralistic practice. ISS Working Papers – General Series.
   Google Scholar
• GeorgeC. 2001. Sustainability appraisal for sustainable development: integrating everything from jobs to climate change. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 19:95–106.
   Google Scholar
• GoliniR, KalchschmidtM, LandoniP. 2013. Adoption of project management practices: the impact on international development projects of non-governmental organizations. In: RadujkovićM, VukomanovićM, editors. Proceedings of the 27th IPMA World Congress; Dubrovnik, Croatia. p. 585–596.
   Google Scholar
• HermanoV, Lopez-ParedesA, Martin-CruzN, PajaresJ. 2013. How to manage international development (ID) projects successfully. Is the PMD Pro1 guide going to the right direction?Int J Project Management. 31(1):22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HofstedeG, HofstedeGJ. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• HydenG. 1998. Building civil society at the turn of the millennium. In: BurdridgeJ, editor. Beyond prince and merchant: citizen participation and the rise of civil society. New York: PACT Publications; p. 17–47.
   Google Scholar
• IkaLA. 2012. Project management for development in Africa: why projects are failing and what can be done about it. Project Manage J. 43:27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IkaLA, DialloA, ThuillierD. 2010. Project management in the international development industry: the project coordinator's perspective. Int J Manag Projects Business. 3:61–93.
   Google Scholar
• IkaLA, DialloA, ThuillierD. 2012. Critical success factors for World Bank projects: an empirical investigation. Int J Project Manage. 30:105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KhangDB, MoeTL. 2008. Success criteria and factors for international development projects: a life cycle based framework. Project Manage J. 39:72–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KochDJ, DreherA, NunnenkampP, ThieleR. 2009. Keeping a low profile: what determines the allocation of aid by non-governmental organizations?World Dev. 37:902–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KwakYH, DixonCK. 2008. Risk management framework for pharmaceutical research and development projects. Int J Manag Projects Business. 1:552–565.
   Google Scholar
• LandoniP, CortiB. 2011. The management of international development projects: moving toward a standard approach or differentiation?Project Manage J. 42:45–61.
   Google Scholar
• LindbergP, VossC, BlackmonKL. 1998. International manufacturing strategies: context, content, and change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.
   Google Scholar
• LovegroveN, GebreB, LeeT, KumarR. 2011. McKinsey–Devex survey results: practitioners see need for new approaches to system-wide reform. McKinsey-Devex. Available from: http://www.devex.com/en/news/mckinsey-devex-survey-results-practitioners-see/77026.
   Google Scholar
• MoeTL,PathranarakulP. 2006. An integrated approach to natural disaster management: public project management and its critical success factors. Disaster Prev Manage.15(3):396–413.
   Google Scholar
• MosleyP. 2001. A simple technology for poverty-oriented project assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 19:53–67.
   Google Scholar
• MuriithiN, CrawfordL. 2003. Approaches to project management in Africa: implications for international development projects. Int J Project Manage. 21:309–319.
   Google Scholar
• NewcomerK, BaradeiLE, GarciaS. 2013. Expectations and capacity of performance measurement in NGOs in the development context. Public Admin Dev. 33:62–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Development co-operation report 2012: lessons in linking sustainability and development. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/dcr-2012-en.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. Development co-operation report 2013: ending poverty. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/dcr-2013-en.
   Google Scholar
• PattonMQ. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousands Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• PMI. 2008. A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® Guide). 4th ed. Newtown Square (PA): PMI.
   Google Scholar
• PM4NGO.2012. A guide to the PMD Pro1: project management for development professionals – Level 1. In: Cropper J, Berg E, Culligan M, Radstone L, editors.
   Google Scholar
• PutnamRD, LeonardiR, NanettiR. 1994. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quartey Jnr EL. 1996. Development projects through build-operate schemes: their role and place in developing countries. Int J Project Manage. 14(1):47–52.
   Google Scholar
• Roodman D. 2006. Aid project proliferation and absorptive capacity. Research Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU).
   Google Scholar
• SaadM, CicmilS, GreenwoodM. 2002. Technology transfer projects in developing countries – furthering the project management perspectives. Int J Project Manage. 20:617–625.
   Google Scholar
• SmithP. 2000. A comment on the limitations of the logical framework method, in reply to Gasper, and to Bell. Public Admin Dev. 20:439–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solem RR. 1987. The logical framework approach to project design, review and evaluation in A.I.D.: genesis, impact, problems, and opportunities, A.I.D. Working Paper No. 99. Washington Center for Development Information & Evaluation Agency for International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Steinfort P. 2010. Understanding the antecedents of project management best practice – lessons to be learned from aid relief projects [PhD]. Melbourne: School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University.
   Google Scholar
• TranfieldD, DenyerD, SmartP. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Brit J Manage. 14:207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VakilAC. 1997. Confronting the classification problem: toward a taxonomy of NGOs. World Dev. 25:2057–2070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanclayF. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21:5–12.
   Google Scholar
• VanheukelomJ, MigliorisiS, CangasAH, KeijzerN, SpieringsE. 2012. Reporting on development: ODA and financing for development. Study commissioned by The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development. Maastricht: ECDPM.
   Google Scholar
• WoolcockM. 1998. Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory Society. 27:151–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoukerR. 1999. Executive point of view: managing international development projects – lessons learned. Project Manage J. 30:6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Youker R. 2003. The nature of international development projects. PMI Conference.
   Google Scholar
• ZhaiL, XinY, ChengC. 2009. Understanding the value of project management from a stakeholder's perspective: case study of mega-project management. Project Manage J. 40:99–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZimmermannF, SmithK. 2011. More actors, more money, more ideas for international development co-operation. J Int Dev. 23:722–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar