Assessing territorial impacts of the EU cohesion policy at the regional level: the case of Algarve

References

• AndreouG. 2006. Cohesion policy in Greece: patterns of governance and Europeanization. South Eur Soc Polit. 11(2):241–259.
   Google Scholar
• AndreouG. 2009. The added value of EU cohesion policy in the Greek periphery: the case of Epirus. Southeast Eur Black Sea Stud. 9(1–2):59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BatterburyS. 2006. Principles and purposes of European Union Cohesion policy evaluation. Reg Stud. 40(2):179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BeckerH, VanclayF. 2003. The international handbook of social impact assessment. Conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgars.
   Google Scholar
• BeggI. 2010. Cohesion or confusion: a policy searching for objectives. J Eur Integr. 32(1):77–96.
   Google Scholar
• BradleyJ. 2006. Evaluating the impact of European Union Cohesion policy in less-developed countries and regions. Reg Stud. 40(2):189–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BradleyJ, WrenC. 2006. Evaluation of European Union Cohesion policy: research questions and policy challenges. Reg Stud. 40(2):143–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamagniR. 2009. Territorial impact assessment for European regions: a methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. Eval Program Plann. 32:342–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CartwrightA, BatoryA. 2011. Monitoring committees in cohesion policy: overseeing the distribution of structural funds in Hungary and Slovakia. J Eur Integr. 34(4):323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CCDRALG] Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve. 2000. Programa Operacional do Algarve[Algarve operational programme]. Faro: Quadro Comunitário de Apoio III, Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• [CCDRALG] Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve. 2002. Plano Regional de Ordenamento do Território – PROT Algarve – Um território com futuro, Volume II – Caracterização e Diagnóstico – Parte 1 [Regional spatial plan – PROT – Algarve – a territory with future. Volume II – Characterization and Diagnosis – Part 1]. Faro: Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• [CCDRALG] Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve. 2007. Plano Regional de Ordenamento do Território – PROT Algarve – Um território com futuro. Volume I: Plano [Regional spatial plan – PROT – Algarve – A territory with future. Volume I – Plan]. Faro: Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• [CCDRALG] Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve. 2010. Programa Operacional da Região do Algarve PROAlgarve [Algarve operational programme]. Faro: Relatório Final de Execução, Comissão de Coordenação e Desenvolvimento Regional do Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• De RynckS, McAleaveyP. 2006. The cohesion deficit in Structural Fund policy. J Eur Public Policy. 8(4):541–557.
   Google Scholar
• [DPP] Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento. 2005. Avaliação do impacto dos Programas Operacionais Regionais (QCA III) em 2000–2003 [Impact assessment of the regional operational programmes (QCA III) in 2000–2003]. Lisbon: Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento, Ministério do Planeamento.
   Google Scholar
• [DPP] Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento. 2007. Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional – 2007–2013. Avaliação Ex-Ante. Lisbon: Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento, Ministério do Planeamento.
   Google Scholar
• [DPP] Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento. 2011. Avaliação do impacto macroeconómico do quadro de referência estratégico nacional 2007–2013 (QREN). Relatório Final, Março de 2011. Lisbon: Departamento de Prospectiva e Planeamento e Relações Internacionais.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON 3.2. 2006. Spatial scenarios and orientations in relation to the ESDP and Cohesion Policy. Territorial impact assessment, Vol. 5. Luxemburg: ESPON. (Final report, 2006 Oct).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON ARTS. 2012. Assessment of regional and territorial sensitivity. Luxemburg: ESPON ARTS, (Applied Research 2013/1/17, final report, version 30/07/2012).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON EATIA. 2012. ESPON and territorial impact assessment. Luxemburg: ESPON, (Targeted Analysis 2013/2/9, final report, version 29/06/2012).
   Google Scholar
• ESPON TIPTAP. 2010. Territorial impact package for transport and agricultural policies. Luxemburg: The ESPON 2013 Programme, (Applied Research Project 2013/1/6, final report – part A and B).
   Google Scholar
• EspostiR, BussolettiS. 2008. Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: a panel-data approach. Reg Stud. 42(2):159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 1996. Methodologies for transport impact assessment, Transport Research APAS, Strategic Transport, European Commission. Directorate-General of Transport, Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 1999. MEANS – evaluation socio-economic programmes – glossary of 300 concepts and technical terms. Vol. 6. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2005. Impact assessment guidelines. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2008. EVALSED – the resource for the evaluation for socio-economic development. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2009. Impact assessment guidelines. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2010. Investing in Europe's future: fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• FaludiA. 2006. From European spatial development to territorial cohesion policy. Reg Stud. 40(6):667–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerrãoJ. 2010. Ordenamento do território: 25 anos de aprendizagem? [Spatial planning: 25 years of learning?]. Europa Novas Fronteiras, Portugal – 25 anos de Integração Europeia. 26/27. Parede: Princípia Editora, Lda; p. 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• GasparJ. 2010. As infra-estruturas do território como factor de desenvolvimento económico e social [The territorial infrastructures as a factor of socioeconomic development]. Europa Novas Fronteiras, Portugal – 25 anos de Integração Europeia. 26/27. Parede: Princípia Editora, Lda; p. 85–91.
   Google Scholar
• GolobičM, MarotN. 2011. Territorial impact assessment: integrating territorial aspects in sectoral policies. Eval Program Plann. 34(3):163–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IGFSE] Instituto de Gestão do Fundo Social Europeu. 2009. Intervenção do FSE e Desenvolvimento do Potencial Humano em Portugal. Estudo de Avaliação integrado na colecção de estudos: temas fundo social europeu. Lisbon: Instituto de Gestão do Fundo Social Europeu, I.P.
   Google Scholar
• LeeC, TaylorT. 2005. Critical reflections on the economic impact assessment of a mega-event: the case of 2002 FIFA World Cup. Tourism Manage. 26:595–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeonardiR. 2006. Cohesion in the European Union. Reg Stud. 40(2):155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoiseauE, JunquaG, RouxP, Bellon-MaurelV. 2012. Environmental assessment of a territory: an overview of existing tools and methods. J Environ Manag. 112:213–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MairateA. 2006. The ‘added value’ of European Union Cohesion policy. Reg Stud. 40(2):167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartinR, TylerP. 2006. Evaluating the impact of the structural funds on objective 1regions: an exploratory discussion. Reg Stud. 40(2):201–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MateusA (coord). 2013. 25 anos de Portugal Europeu. A economia, a sociedade e os fundos estruturais [25 years of a European Portugal. The economy, the society and the structural funds]. Lisbon: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
   Google Scholar
• MedeirosE. 2012. A coesão Territorial. O conceito e o seu significado na política de coesão da UE [The Territorial Cohesion. The concept and its significance to the EU Cohesion Policy]. Lisbon: Núcleo de políticas e Estratégias Territoriais, Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do território, Lisbon University.
   Google Scholar
• MedeirosE. 2013a. Assessing territorial impacts of the EU Cohesion policy: the Portuguese case. Eur Plann Stud. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Oct 03]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09654313.2013.813910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros E. 2013b. Efeitos e Impactos Territoriais da Política de Coesão da UE na Península Ibérica e na Península Escandinava. [Internet]. IGOT, Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Lisbon University; [cited 2014 Mar 18]. Available from: http://ww3.fl.ul.pt///pessoais/Eduardo_Medeiros/docs/Impactos_Territoriais_Política_Coesão_Portugal_EM_01_09_2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MedeirosE. 2013c. Euro-Meso-Macro: the new regions in Iberian and European space. Reg Stud. 47(8):1249–1266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MedeirosE. 2013d. A Política de Coesão da UE em Portugal (1989–2013). Contribuições para o desenvolvimento territorial [The EU Cohesion Policy in Portugal (1989–2013). Contributions to the territorial development]. Lisbon: Centro de Estudos Geográficos, Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do território, Lisbon University.
   Google Scholar
• [MPAT] Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território. 1989. Quadro Comunitário de Apoio do PDR, Plano de Desenvolvimento Regional 1989–1993 [Common Strategic Framework of the Regional Development Plan 1989–1993]. Lisbon: Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território, Secretaria de Estado do Planeamento e Desenvolvimento Regional.
   Google Scholar
• [MPAT] Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território. 1993. Preparar Portugal para o Século XXI – Opções Estratégicas [Preparing Portugal for the twenty-first century – Strategic options]. Lisbon: Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território, Secretaria de Estado do Planeamento e Desenvolvimento Regional.
   Google Scholar
• MolleW. 2007. European Cohesion Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Territorial reviews – Portugal. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• PiresL. 1998. A política Regional Europeia e Portugal [The EU regional policy and Portugal]. Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Serviço de Educação.
   Google Scholar
• [QREN] Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional. 2008. Programa Operacional Regional do Algarve 2007–2013 [Algarve's regional operational programme 2007–2013]. Lisboa: Observatório do QREN – Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional.
   Google Scholar
• RibeiroJF. 2010. Portugal e Espanha – Balanço de 25 anos de integração europeia e da internacionalização das economias, desafios para o futuro. [Portugal and Spain – A synopsis of 25 years of European integration and the economies internationalization, future challenge's]. Pedro de Avilez. Parede: Princípia Editora, Lda; p. 293–312.
   Google Scholar
• RomãoA, ed. 2006. A economia portuguesa 20 anos após a adesão, II série, N°1 [The Portuguese economy 20 years after the EU accession]. Colecção Económicas. Coimbra: Almedina.
   Google Scholar
• TscherningK, KönigH, BirtheS, HelmingK, SieberS. 2007. Ex-ante impact assessments (IA) in the European Commission – an overview. In: Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes. New York: Springer; p. 17–33.
   Google Scholar
• TommiI. 2005. European coherence and regional policy? A Finnish perspective on the observed and reported territorial impacts of EU research and development policies. Eur Plann Stud. 13(7):1113–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VargaJ, VeldJ. 2011. A model-based analysis of the impact of Cohesion Policy expenditure 2000–06: simulations with the QUEST III endogenous R&D model. Econ Model. 28:647–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar