Social licence to operate and impact assessment

References

• ACCSR. 2011. Upper hunter mining dialogue: report on the stakeholder survey for the NSW minerals council [Internet]; [cited 2014 Jul 21]. Available from: http://www.accsr.com.au/pdf/MIN_217427_UHMD_ACCSR_branded_FA5_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• AguileraRV, RuppDE, WilliamsCA, GanapathiJ. 2007. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: a multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Acad Manage Rev. 32:836–863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BiceS. 2012. Beyond the business case: a new institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in the Australian mining industry [PhD thesis].Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• BiceS. 2014. What gives you a social licence? An exploration of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry. Resources. 3:62–80.
   Google Scholar
• BoutilierR. 2014. Frequently asked questions about the social licence to operate. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BruecknerM, DureyA, PforrC, MayesR. 2014. The civic virtue of developmentalism: on the mining industry's political licence to develop Western Australia. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:315–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COAG Energy Council. 2013. National harmonised regulatory framework for natural gas from coal seams. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments.
   Google Scholar
• DIP. 2010. Social impact assessment: guideline to preparing a social impact management plan [Internet]. Queensland Government Department of Infrastructure and Planning. Available from: http://www.dsdip.qld.gov.au/resources/guideline/simp-guideline.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EpsteinM, BuhovacA. 2014. The foundations for measuring social, environmental and economic impacts. In: Epstein M, editor. Making sustainability work. Chapter 6. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing; p. 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• EstevesAM, FranksD, VanclayF. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 30:34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FranksD, CohenT. 2011. Investigating constructive technology assessment within the Minerals Down Under Flagship: interview results. Cluster research report 2.2.Canberra: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• FranksD, VanclayF. 2013. Social impact management plans: innovation in corporate and public policy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GunninghamN, KaganRA, ThorntonD. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Social Inquiry. 29:307–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarveyB, BiceS. 2014. Social impact assessment, social development programmes and social licence to operate: tensions and contradictions in intent and practice in the extractive sector. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Council on Mining and Metals. 2014. Strategy and action plan [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icmm.com/page/83971/about-us/strategy-and-action-plan/strategy-and-action-plan.
   Google Scholar
• International Finance Corporation. 2007. Stakeholder engagement: a good practice guide for companies doing business in emerging markets. Washington (DC): IFC.
   Google Scholar
• JijelavaD, VanclayF. 2014. Social licence to operate through a gender lens: the challenges of including women's interests in development assistance projects. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KempD, OwenJR, van de GraffS. 2012. Corporate social responsibility, mining and ‘audit culture’. J Cleaner Prod. 24:1–10. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuch D, Ellem G, Bahnisch M, Webb S. 2013. Social license and communications report. ACOLA ARC LASP program Securing Australia's future – project #6 Engineering energy: unconventional gas production. Melbourne: ACOLA.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey J. 2013. Can you legislate a social licence to operate? The conversation [Internet]. Published 2013 Feb 27; [cited 2014 Jul 21]. http://theconversation.com/can-you-legislate-a-social-licence-to-operate-10948.
   Google Scholar
• LaceyJ, LamontJ. 2013. Using social contract to inform social licence to operate: an application in the Australian coal seam gas industry. J Cleaner Prod. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LaceyJ, ParsonsR, MoffatK. 2012. Exploring the concept of a social licence to operate in the Australian minerals industry: results from interviews with industry representatives. Brisbane: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Leyne L. 2014 Jun 18. ‘Social license’ comes home to roost. Times Colonist. British Columbia, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lytham St Anne's Express. 2014. Anti-frackers plan mass site protest. Lytham St Anne's Express online [Internet]; [cited 2014 Aug 28]. Available from: http://www.lythamstannesexpress.co.uk/news/anti-frackers-plan-mass-site-protest-1-6743294.
   Google Scholar
• MacdonaldC, SchloeffelA. Date unknown. Social responsibility in the mining and metals sector in developing countries. Canberra: Australian Commonwealth Government.
   Google Scholar
• MartinezC, FranksD. 2014. Does mining company-sponsored community development influence social licence to operate? Evidence from private and state owned companies in Chile. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:294–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoffatK, ZhangA. 2014. The paths to social licence to operate: an integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resour Policy. 39:61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OwenJ, KempD. 2012. Social licence and mining: a critical perspective. Resour Policy. 37(3):29–35.
   Google Scholar
• ParkerC. 2007. Meta-regulation: legal accountability for corporate social responsibility. In: McBarnetD, VoiculescuA, CampbellT, editors. The new corporate accountability: corporate social responsibility and the law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 207–240.
   Google Scholar
• ParsonsR, MoffatK. Forthcoming 2014a. Constructing the meaning of social licence. Soc Epistemol.
   Google Scholar
• ParsonsR, MoffatK. 2014b. Integrating impact and relational dimensions of social licence and social impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrnoJ. 2013. An analysis of factors leading to the establishment of a social licence to operate in the mining industry. Resour Policy. 38:577–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrnoJ, SlocombeS. 2012. Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resour Policy. 37:346–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PrnoJ, SlocombeS. 2013. A systems-based conceptual framework for assessing the determinants of a social license to operate in the mining industry. Environ Manage. 53:672–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rio Tinto. 2011. Group strategy, annual report 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.riotinto.com/annualreport2011/overview/group_strategy.html.
   Google Scholar
• RuckstuhlK, Thompson-FawcettM, RaeH. 2014. Māori and mining: indigenous perspectives on reconceptualising and contextualising the social licence to operate. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:304–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIA Hub. 2014. SIA training [Internet]. Available from: http://www.socialimpactassessment.com/training-archive.asp.
   Google Scholar
• ThomsonI, BoutilierR. 2011. The social license to operate. In: DarlingP, editor. SME mining engineering handbook. Littleton (CO): Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
   Google Scholar
• VogelD. 2008. Private global business regulation. Ann Rev Polit Sci. 11:261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WilburnK, WilburnR. 2011. Achieving social license to operate using stakeholder theory. J Bus Ethics. 4:3–16.
   Google Scholar