Assessing the utility of environmental factors and objectives in environmental impact assessment practice: Western Australian insights

References

• BeanlandsGE, DuinkerPN. 1983. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment. Institute for Resource and Environmental Studies, Dalhousie University; Halifax, Nova Scotia.
   Google Scholar
• BondA, StewartG. 2002. Environment agency scoping guidance on the environmental impact assessment of projects. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.20(2):135–142.
   Google Scholar
• BowenB. 1997. Environmental management systems and environmental regulation. Aust Environ Law News.3:21–25.
   Google Scholar
• DonnellyA, JenningsE, FinnanJ, MooneyP, LynnD, JonesM, O'MahonyT, ThérivelR, ByrneG. 2006a. Objectives, targets and indicator for use in strategic environmental assessment (SEA). J Environ Assess Policy Manage.8:135–156.
   Google Scholar
• DonnellyA, JonesMB, O'MahonyT, ByrneG. 2006b. Decision support framework for establishing objectives, targets and indicators for use in SEA. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.24:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• DonnellyA, PrendergastT, HanuschM. 2008. Examining quality of environmental objectives, targets and indicators in environmental reports prepared for strategic environmental assessment. J Environ Assess Policy Manage.10(4):381–401.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Authority). 1992. EPA Bulletin 625 guidance notes: from Environmental Protection Authority reports 1971–1992, Western Australia. Environmental Protection Authority; Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2004. Guide to EIA environmental principles, factors and objectives, version 2. Environmental Protection Authority; Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2013a. Environmental assessment guideline 8 – environmental factors and objectives. Environmental Protection Authority; Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2013b. Environmental assessment guideline 9 – application of a significance framework in the EIA process. Environmental Protection Authority; Western Australia.
   Google Scholar
• GaoJ, ChristensenP, KornovL. 2014. The changing Chinese SEA indicator guidelines: top-down or bottom-up?Environ Impact Assess Rev.44:22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaoJ, KornovL, ChristensenP. 2013. Do indicators influence communication in Chinese SEA processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev.43:121–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlassonJ, TherivelR, ChadwickA. 2012. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. 4th ed.Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• IEA UKIAIA. 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice; [accessed 2013 Aug 20]. Available from: http://www.iaia.org/publicdocuments/special-publications/Principles%20of%20IA_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• LawrenceD. 2013. Impact assessment: practical solutions to recurrent problems and contemporary challenges. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, BaileyJ. 2000. Transparency in environment impact assessment decision making: recent developments in Western Australia. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.18(4):260–270.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, PopeJ, GunnJ, BondA, RetiefF. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.32(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OrensteinM, Fossgard-MoserT, HindmarchT, DowseS, KuschminderJ, McCloskeyP, MugoR. 2010. Case study of an integrated assessment: Shell's North Field Test in Alberta. Canada. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.28(2):147–157.
   Google Scholar
• RamosT, AlvesaI, SubtilaR, Joanaz de MeloJ. 2007. Environmental performance policy indicators for the public sector: the case of the defence sector. J Environ Manage.82(4):410–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ReedM, FraserE, DougillA. 2006. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ.59(4):406–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RossW, Morrison-SaundersA, MarshallR. 2006. Common sense in environmental impact assessment: it is not as common as it should be. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.24(1):3–22.
   Google Scholar
• SadlerB. 1996. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment, final report, environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Canadian environmental assessment agency and the international association for impact assessment, minister of supply and services; Canada.
   Google Scholar
• SanchezL, Morrison-SaundersA. 2011. Learning about knowledge management for improving environmental impact assessment in a government agency: the Western Australian experience. J Environ Manage.92(9):2260–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SippeR. 1999. Criteria and standards for assessing significant impact. In: PettsJ, editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment volume 1: environmental impact assessment: process, methods and potential. Oxford: Blackwell Science; p. 74–92.
   Google Scholar
• TherivelR. 2010. Strategic environmental assessment in action. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• WaldeckS, Morrison-SaundersA, AnnandaleD. 2003. Effectiveness of nonlegal EIA guidance from the perspective of consultants in Western Australia. Impact Assess Project Appraisal.21(3):251–256.
   Google Scholar
• WilsonV. 2012. Research methods: interviews. Evid Based Libr Inf Pract.7(2):96–98.
   Google Scholar
• WoodC. 1999. Comparative evaluation of environmental impact assessment systems. In: PettsJ, editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment, volume 2: environmental impact assessment in practice: impacts and limitations. Oxford: Blackwell Science; p. 10–34.
   Google Scholar
• WoodG, GlassonJ, BeckerJ. 2006. EIA scoping in England and Wales: practitioner approaches, perspectives and constraints. Environ Impact Assess Rev.26:221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar