Bridging corporate social responsibility and social impact assessment

References

• Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. 2011. Upper Hunter Mining Dialogue: report on the stakeholder survey for the NSW Minerals Council. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. 2013. The state of CSR in Australia and New Zealand: annual review 2012/13. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Stock Exchange. 2014. Corporate governance principles and recommendations. Canberra: Australian Stock Exchange.
   Google Scholar
• BainesJT, TaylorN, VanclayF. 2013. Social impact assessment and ethical research principles: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part II. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 31:254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BHP Billiton. 2013a. Building human and enterprise capacity – making a positive contribution to society: case study. Melbourne: BHP Billiton.
   Google Scholar
• BHP Billiton. 2013b. Our shared values: sustainability report 2013. Melbourne: BHP Billiton.
   Google Scholar
• BiceS. 2012. Beyond the business case: a new institutional analysis of corporate social responsibility in Australian mining. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• BiceS. 2013. No more sun shades please: experiences of corporate social responsibility in remote Australian mining communities. Rural Soc J. 22:138–152.
   Google Scholar
• BiceS. 2014. What gives you a social licence? An exploration of the social licence to operate in the Australian mining industry. Resources. 3:62–80.
   Google Scholar
• BiceS, MoffatK. 2014. Social licence to operate and impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:257–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlowfieldM, FrynasJG. 2005. Setting new agendas: critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. Int Aff. 81:499–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BondA, PopeJ. 2012. The state of the art of impact assessment in 2012. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 30:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BondyK, MoonJ, MattenD. 2012. An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): form and implications. J Bus Ethics. 111:281–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarrollAB. 2008. A history of corporate social responsibility: concepts and practices. In: CraneA, McWilliamsA, MattenD, MoonJ, SiegelD, editors. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• ChappleW, MoonJ. 2005. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: a seven-country study of CSR web site reporting. Bus Soc. 44:415–443.
   Google Scholar
• COAG Standing Council on Energy and Resources. 2012. The draft National Harmonised Regulatory Framework: coal seam gas. Canberra: Council of Australian Governments (COAG).
   Google Scholar
• CraneA, McWilliamsA, MattenD, MoonJ, SiegelD. 2008. The corporate social responsibility agenda. In: CraneA, McWilliamsA, MattenD, MoonJ, SiegelD, editors. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggioP, PowellW. 1991. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In: PowellW, DiMaggioP, editors. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; p. 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• EstevesAM, FranksD, VanclayF. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 30:32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ForrestalL, MassolaJ. 2013. Minerals Council tied up in red and green tape: report. Australian Financial ReviewSydney: Fairfax Media.
   Google Scholar
• FrederickWC. 2008. Corporate social responsibility: deep roots, flourishing growth, promising future. In: CraneA, McWilliamsA, MattenD, MoonJ, SiegelD, editors. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 522–531.
   Google Scholar
• FreudenburgW. 1986. Social impact assessment. Annu Rev Sociol. 12:451–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GRI] Global Reporting Initiative. 2010. Sustainability reporting guidelines and mining and metals sector supplement. Clarification of mining and metals supplement changes. Amsterdam: GRI.
   Google Scholar
• GunninghamN, KaganR, ThorntonD. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Social Inq. 29:307–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartz-KarpJ, PopeJ. 2012. Enhancing effectiveness through deliberative democracy. In: VanclayF, EstevesAM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 253–272.
   Google Scholar
• HarveyB, BiceS. 2014. Social impact assessment, social development programmes and social licence to operate: tensions and contradictions in intent and practice in the extractive sector. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HustedB. 2005. Risk management, real options and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 60:175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HustedB, AllenD. 2011. Corporate social strategy: stakeholder engagement and competitive advantage. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• [IAIA] International Association for Impact Assessment. 2003. Social impact assessment international principles. Fargo, ND: IAIA.
   Google Scholar
• JamaliD. 2007. A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: a fresh perspective into theory and practice. J Bus Ethics. 82:213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JenkinsH. 2004. Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: conflicts and constructs. Corp Social Responsibility Environ Manag. 11:23–34.
   Google Scholar
• KempD. 2009. Community relations in the global mining industry: exploring the internal dimensions of externally oriented work. Corp Social Responsibility Environ Manag. 17:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KempD. 2010. Community relations in the global mining industry: exploring the internal dimensions of externally oriented work. Corp Social Responsibility Environ Manag. 17:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LockieS. 2001. SIA in review: setting the agend for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 19:277–287.
   Google Scholar
• MattenD, MoonJ. 2008. ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: a conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev. 33:404–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MeyerJW, RowanB. 1991. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. In: DiMaggioP, PowellW, editors. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; p. 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, PopeJ, GunnJAE, BondA, RetiefF. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 32:2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New South Wales Minerals Council. 2013 Dec. Upper Hunter Mining Dialogue: update and new projects. Sydney: New South Wales Minerals Council.
   Google Scholar
• NishS, BiceS. 2012. Community based agreement-making with land connected peoples. In: VanclayF, EstevesAM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• O'FaircheallaighC. 2004. Denying citizens their rights? Indigenous people, mining payments and service provision. Aust J Public Adm. 63:42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Economic and Statistical Research. 2010. Workforce analysis of the Bowen Basin. Queensland: Office of Economic and Statistical Research, Queensland Treasury for the Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation Report.
   Google Scholar
• OrlitzkyM, BenjaminJD. 2001. Corporate social performance and firm risk: a meta-analytic review. Bus Soc. 40:369–396.
   Google Scholar
• PorterM, KramerM. 2008. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. In: PorterM, editor. On competition. New Haven, CT: Harvard Business School Press; p. 544.
   Google Scholar
• PorterM, KramerM. 2011 Jan. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• PowerM. 1997. The audit society. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RetiefF, Morrison-SaundersA, GenelettiD, PopeJ. 2013. Exploring the psychology of trade-off decision-making in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 31:13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScottWR. 1994. Institutions and organizations: toward a theoretical synthesis. In: ScottWR, MeyerJW, editors. Institutional environments and organizations. Thousan Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; p. 55–78.
   Google Scholar
• UK AID and Fundar. 2011. Defending Latin America's indigenous and tribal peoples' rights through laws and the courts. London: UK AID.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Global Compact, Accenture. 2010. A new era of sustainability: UN Global Compact-Accenture CEO study 2010. UNGC-Accenture.
   Google Scholar
• US Congress. 2010. Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. HR 4173.
   Google Scholar
• VanclayF. 2003. Conceptual and methodological advances in social impact assessment. In: BeckerH, VanclayF, editors. The international handbook of social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• VanclayF, BainesJT, TaylorN. 2013. Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 31:243–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanclayF, EstevesAM. 2012a. Current issues and trends in social impact assessment. In: VanclayF, EstevesAM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• VanclayF, EstevesAM. 2012b. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• VogelD. 2008. Private global business regulation. Annu Rev Political Sci. 11:261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinklerMS, KriegerGR, DivallMJ, CisseG, WielgaM, SingerBH, TannerM, UtzingerJ. 2013. Untapped potential of health impact assessment. Bull World Health Organ. 91:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WoodDJ, LogsdonJ, LewellynP, DavenportK. 2006. Global business citizenship: a transformative framework for ethics and sustainable capitalism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc..
   Google Scholar
• WoodG. 1998. Projects as communities: consultants, knowledge, power. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 16:54–64.
   Google Scholar