Towards effective scoping in strategic environmental assessment

References

• Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B. 2004. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. Geneva: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed K, Mercier JR, Verheem R. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment – concept and practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• APA (Portuguese Environmental Agency). 2014. Instrumentos. Avaliação ambiental estratégica. Responsabilidades [Internet]; [cited 2014 Oct 30]. Links available from: http://www.apambiente.pt/index.php?ref = 17&subref = 147&sub2ref = 655&sub3ref = 661.
   Google Scholar
• Aschemann R. 2004. Lessons learned from Austrian SEAs. Eur Environ. 14:165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Baker DC, McLelland JN. 2003. Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia's environmental assessment process for First Nations' participation in mining development. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23:581–603.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin L. 1977. Análise de Conteúdo [Content analysis]. Portuguese ed. Antero Reto L, Pinheiro A, translators. Lisbon: Edições 70.
   Google Scholar
• Bina O, Wallington T, Thissen W. 2011. SEA theory and research: an analysis of the early discourse. In: Sadler B, Dusik J, Fischer T, Partidario M, Verheem R, editors. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan; p. 445–471.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2012. Social research methods. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canter L, Ross B. 2014. A basic need for integration – bringing focus to the scoping process. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32:21–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso R, Breda-Vázquez I. 2007. Social justice as a guide to planning theory and practice: analyzing the Portuguese planning system. Int J Urban Reg Res. 31:384–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEQ (Council on Environmental Quality). 1981. Memorandum for general counsels, NEPA liaisons and participants in scoping.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CM Batalha (Câmara Municipal da Batalha). 2008. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Plano de Pormenor da Zona Industrial de S. Mamede – Relatório de Definição do Âmbito [Strategic environmental assessment of São Mamede's industrial area – scoping report]. Batalha.
   Google Scholar
• CM Coimbra (Câmara Municipal de Coimbra). 2010. Relatório de Definição do Âmbito da AAE – Plano de Urbanização da Entrada Poente e Nova Estação Central de Coimbra [SEA scoping report – West entrance and new Coimbra's Central Station] (Intermodal interface). Coimbra.
   Google Scholar
• CM Condeixa (Câmara Municipal de Condeixa). 2009. AAE da proposta de revisão do Plano Director Municipal de Condeixa – Relatório de Factores Críticos para a Decisão [SEA of Condeixa's municipal master plan revision proposal – critical decision factors report]. Condeixa.
   Google Scholar
• CM Constância (Câmara Municipal de Constância). 2009. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica da revisão do Plano Director Municipal de Constância – Relatório de Factores Críticos [Strategic environmental assessment of Constância's municipal master plan revision – critical factors report]. Constância.
   Google Scholar
• CM Estarreja (Câmara Municipal de Estarreja). 2009. Relatório de Factores Críticos da Proposta de Revisão e Ampliação do Plano de Pormenor do Ecoparque Empresarial de Estarreja [Critical factors report of the revision and extension of the Detail Plan of Ecoparque Empresarial de Estarreja]. Estarreja.
   Google Scholar
• CM Felgueiras (Câmara Municipal de Felgueiras). 2008. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica da revisão do Plano Director Municipal de Felgueiras – Relatório de Factores Críticos [Strategic environmental assessment of Felgueiras's municipal master plan revision – critical factors report]. Felgueiras.
   Google Scholar
• CM Figueiró dos Vinhos (Câmara Municipal de Figueiró dos Vinhos. 2008. AAE da Alteração ao Plano Director Municipal de Figueiró dos Vinhos – Relatório de Factores Críticos para a Decisão [SEA of Figueiró dos Vinhos's municipal master plan modification – critical decision factors report]. Figueiró dos Vinhos.
   Google Scholar
• CM Lisboa (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa). 2009. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Plano de Pormenor do Aterro da Boavista/Nascente – Proposta de Definição do Âmbito [Strategic environmental assessment of Boavista/Nascente landfill detail plan – scoping proposal]. Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• CM Lisboa (Câmara Municipal de Lisboa). 2010. Plano de Pormenor das Galinheiras – Relatório do Âmbito da Avaliação Ambiental/Factores Críticos para a Decisão [Galinheiras's detail plan – environmental assessment scoping report/critical decision factors]. Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• CM Loures (Câmara Municipal de Loures). 2008. Plano de Urbanização de Unhos – Relatório de Factores Críticos [Unhos's urbanization plan – critical decision factors]. Loures.
   Google Scholar
• CM Loures (Câmara Municipal de Loures). 2009. Relatório para Consulta do Âmbito – Avaliação Ambiental do Plano de Urbanização de Camarate [Scoping report for consultation on scoping – environmental assessment of Camarate urbanization plan]. Loures.
   Google Scholar
• CM Óbidos (Câmara Municipal de Óbidos). 2009. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica da Alteração ao Plano Director Municipal de Óbidos – Definição do Âmbito [Strategic environmental assessment of Óbidos's municipal master plan modification – scope definition]. Óbidos.
   Google Scholar
• CM Santa Comba Dão (Câmara Municipal de Santa Comba Dão). 2010. Relatório de Definição do Âmbito do Plano de Pormenor do Granjal [Scoping report of Granjal detail plan]. Santa Comba Dão.
   Google Scholar
• CM Tondela (Câmara Municipal de Tondela). 2009. Plano Director Municipal de Tondela – Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica, Relatório de Factores Críticos [Tondela's municipal master plan – strategic environmental assessment scoping report]. Tondela.
   Google Scholar
• CM Torres Novas (Câmara Municipal de Torres Novas). 2009. AAE da proposta de revisão do Plano Director Municipal de Torres Novas – Relatório de Factores Críticos para a Decisão [SEA of Torres Novas's municipal master plan revision proposal – critical decision factors report]. Torres Novas.
   Google Scholar
• CM Vinhais (Câmara Municipal de Vinhais). 2008. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica da revisão do Plano Director Municipal de Vinhais – Relatório de Factores Críticos para a Decisão [Strategic environmental assessment of Vinhais's municipal master plan revision – critical decision factors report]. Vinhais.
   Google Scholar
• DEAT/CSIR (Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism/The Council for Scientific and Industrial Research). 2000. Strategic environmental assessment in South Africa: guideline document. Pretoria: DEAT.
   Google Scholar
• Decreto Legislativo Regional n. 30/2010/A [in Portuguese]. Diário da República, 1.a série – N.o 221 – de 15 de Novembro de 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Decreto-Lei n. 232/2007 [in Portuguese]. Diário da República, 1.a série – N.o 114 – de 15 Junho de 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Decreto-Lei n. 380/99 [in Portuguese]. Diário da República, 1.a série – N.o 222 – de 22 Setembro de 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government. 2010. Towards a more efficient and effective use of strategic environmental assessment and sustainability appraisal in spatial planning. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• DGOTDU (Direccção-Geral do Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento Urbano). 2008. Guia da Avaliação Ambiental dos Planos Municipais de Ordenamento do Território [Environmental assessment guidance for local spatial plans]. Lisbon: DGOTDU.
   Google Scholar
• DGT (Direção-Geral do Território). Date unknown. Compendium of the national spatial planning system: national contribution – Portugal. Counc Eur [Internet]; [cited 2014 Oct 31]. Available from: http://www.coe.int/t/dgap/localdemocracy/cemat/Compendium/CompendiumPortugal_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliment and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Official Journal of the European Communities L 197 of 27 June 2001.
   Google Scholar
• DROTH (Direcção Regional do Ordenamento do Território e Recursos Hídricos). 2007. Relatório de Definição do Âmbito da Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Plano Regional de Ordenamento do Território dos Açores [Strategic environmental assessment scoping report of the Azores's regional spatial planning plan]. Ponta Delgada.
   Google Scholar
• EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2012. Review of effectiveness of SEA in Ireland: key findings and recommendations. Wexford, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. COM(2009) 469 final: Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the application and effectiveness of the Directive on Strategic Environmental Assessment. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2011. Regions in the European Union – nomenclature of territorial units for statistics (NUTS 2010/EU-27). Luxembourg: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fidélis T, Sumares D. 2008. Nature conservation and urban development control in the Portuguese planning system: a new impetus against old praxis? Eur Environ. 18:298–311.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2002a. Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria – the same requirements for every assessment? J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 4:83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2002b. Strategic environmental assessment in transport and land use planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2010. Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P. 2006. SEA effectiveness criteria – equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:396–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Onyango V. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment-related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Phylip-Jones J. 2008. Scoping in environmental assessment. In: Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, BelČáková I, Aschemann R, editors. Environmental assessment lecturers' handbook. [place unknown]: TwoEAM. p. 137–167.
   Google Scholar
• GAO (United States General Accounting Office). 1996. Content analysis: a methodology for structuring and analyzing written material. Washington, DC: GAO.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss AL. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• GRDP (Greening Regional Development Programmes Network). 2006. Handbook on SEA for cohesion policy 2007–2013. Exeter: GRDP.
   Google Scholar
• Hilding-Rydevik T, Bjarnadóttir H. 2007. Context awareness and sensitivity in SEA implementation. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:666–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). 2002. Strategic environmental assessment performance criteria. Fargo: IAIA.
   Google Scholar
• ICNB (Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e da Biodiversidade). 2008. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Plano de Ordenamento da Paisagem Protegida da Albufeira do Azibo – Relatório de Factores Críticos [Strategic environmental assessment of the spatial plan of the protected landscape Azibo Bayou – critical factors report]. Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• IPTM (Instituto Portuário e dos Transportes Marítimos). 2009. Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Plano Nacional Marítimo Portuário – Factores Críticos para a Decisão [Strategic environmental assessment of the Maritime-Port national plan – critical decision factors]. Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson T, Illsley B. 2007. An analysis of the theoretical rationale for using strategic environmental assessment to deliver environmental justice in the light of the Scottish environmental assessment act. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:607–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice & Environment. 2012. Implementation of the SEA Directive in Croatia. Brno, CZ.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly AH, Jackson T, Williams P. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment: lessons for New South Wales, Australia, from Scottish practice. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. 2003. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lei n. 11/87 – Lei de Bases do Ambiente [in Portuguese] (Law n. 11/87 – General Law for the Environment). Diário da República – I Série – A, n.° 81, de 7 de Abril de 1987.
   Google Scholar
• McLauchlan A, João E. 2012. The inherent tensions arising from attempting to carry out strategic environmental assessments on all policies, plans and programmes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 36:23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOPTC (Ministério das Obras Públicas Transportes e Comunicações. 2008. Relatório de Definição do Âmbito da Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica do Plano Estratégico de Transportes [Strategic environmental assessment scoping report of the transportation strategic plan]. Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn JAE, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32:2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvihill PR. 2003. Expanding the scoping community. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23:39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Mulvihill PR, Jacobs P. 1998. Using scoping as a design process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 18:351–369.
   Google Scholar
• Neuendorf K. 2002. The content analysis guidebook. Thausand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Noble BF. 2009. Promise and dismay: the state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister). 2005. A practical guide to the strategic environmental assessment directive. London: ODPM.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment: good practice guidance for development co-operation. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 1996. Strategic environmental assessment: key issues emerging from recent practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 16:31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2000. Elements of an SEA framework – improving the added-value of SEA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20:647–663.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2005. Portugal. In: Jones C, Baker M, Carter J, Jay S, Short M, Wood C, editors. Strategic environmental assessment and land use planning: an international evaluation. London: Earthscan; p. 174–187.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2007. Strategic environmental assessment good practices guide – methodological guidance. Amadora: Portuguese Environmental Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2011. SEA process development and capacity-building – a thematic overview. In: Sadler B, Aschemann R, Dusik J, Fisher T, Partidário MR, Verheem R, editors. Handbook of strategic environmental assessment. London: Earthscan; p. 437–444.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment better practice guide – methodological guidance for strategic thinking in SEA. Lisboa: Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente e Redes Energéticas Nacionais.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR, Nunes D, Lima J. 2010. Definição de Critérios e Avaliação de Relatórios Ambientais [Criteria definition and evaluation of environmental reports]. Amadora: Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Polido A, João E, Ramos TB. 2014. Sustainability approaches and strategic environmental assessment in small islands: an integrative review. Ocean Coast Manag. 96:138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polido A, Ramos TB. 2010. Avaliação da Eficácia da Definição do Âmbito no Processo de Avaliação Ambiental Estratégica em Portugal [Scoping effectiveness evaluation on the Portuguese strategic environmental assessment system] [Masters thesis]. Lisbon: Faculty of Sciences and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2007. A performance evaluation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes within the South African context. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:84–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F, Jones C, Jay S. 2008. The emperor's new clothes – reflections on strategic environmental assessment (SEA) practice in South Africa. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:504–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CW. 1997. Text analysis for the social sciences: methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 1996. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment – environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Canada: Minister of Supply and Services Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Joao E, Albrecht E, João E. 2005. Implementing strategic environmental assessment. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive. 2006. Strategic environmental assessment tool kit. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• SEPA (Scottish Environmental Protection Agency). 2011. The Scottish strategic environmental assessment review. Stirling: Historic Scotland, SEPA, SNH.
   Google Scholar
• Snell T, Cowell R. 2006. Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:359–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderman T, Kallio T. 2009. Strategic environmental assessment in Finland: an evaluation of the SEA Act application. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 11:1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin J. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Theophilou V, Bond A, Cashmore M. 2010. Application of the SEA Directive to EU structural funds: perspectives on effectiveness. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:136–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 2004. Strategic environmental assessment in action. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Torraco RJ. 2005. Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 4:356–367.
   Google Scholar
• van Doren D, Driessen PPJ, Schijf B, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: towards a better understanding. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:120–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Seht H. 1999. Requirements of a comprehensive strategic environmental assessment system. Landsc Urban Plan. 45:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar