Including health in environmental impact assessments: is an institutional approach useful for practice?

References

• AbahSO. 2012. HIA practices in Nigeria. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(3):207–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhmadBS. 2004. Integrating health into impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 22(1):2–4.
   Google Scholar
• AleniusK. 2001. Consideration of health aspects in environmental impact assessments for roads. Tryckcentrum i Stockholm AB.Stockholm: National Institute of Public Health; p. 27.
   Google Scholar
• ArquiagaMC, CanterLW, NelsonDI. 1994. Integration of health impact considerations in environmental impact studies. Impact Assess. 12(2):175–197.
   Google Scholar
• BartlettRV. 1989. Impact Assessment as Policy Strategy. In: BartlettRV, editor. Policy through impact assessment: instititutionalised analysis as a policy strategy. New York (NY): Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• BartlettRV, KurianPA. 1999. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit models of policy making. Policy Politics. 27(4):415–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BhaskarR. 1978. A realist theory of science. 3rd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• BhatiaR, WernhamA. 2008. Integrating human health into environmental impact assessment: an unrealised opportunity for environmental health and justice. Environ Health Perspect. 116(8):991–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. 1998. Health & environmental impact assessment: an integrated approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• CashmoreM. 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 24(4):403–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CashmoreM, BondA, CobbD. 2007. The contribution of environmental assessment to sustainable development: toward a richer empirical understanding. Environ Manage. 40(3):516–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CashmoreM, BondA, CobbD. 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. J Environ Manage. 88(4):1233–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChadwickA. 2002. Socio-economic impacts: are they still the poor relations in UK environmental statements?J Environ Plann Manage. 45(1):3–24.
   Google Scholar
• ColeBL, WilhelmM, LongPV, FieldingJE, KominskiG, MorgensternH.2004. Prospects for health impact assessment in the United States: new and improved environmental impact assessment or something different?J Health Politics Policy Law. 29(6):1153–1186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ElliotM, ThomasI. 2014. Environmental impact assessment in Australia. 6th ed. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• GlassonJ, TherivelR, ChadwickA.2013. Introduction to environmental impact, assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HaighF, HarrisP, HaighN.2012. Health impact assessment research and practice: a place for paradigm positioning?Environ Impact Assess Rev. 33(1):66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisP, HaighF, ThornellM, MolloyL, SainsburyP.2014. Housing, health and master planning: rules of engagement. Public Health. 128(4):354–359. 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisPJ, HarrisE, ThompsonS, Harris-RoxasB, KempL.2009. Human health and wellbeing in environmental impact assessment in New South Wales, Australia: auditing health impacts within environmental assessments of major projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(5):310–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisPJ, KempLA, SainsburyP.2012. The essential elements of health impact assessment and healthy public policy: a qualitative study of practitioner perspectives. BMJ Open. 2. 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisP, SainsburyP, KempL.2014. The fit between health impact assessment and public policy: practice meets theory. Social Sci Med. 108:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisP, SpickettJ. 2011. Health impact assessment in Australia: a review and directions for progress. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(4):425–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris-RoxasB, VilianiF, BondA, CaveB, DivallM, FuruP, HarrisP, SoebergM, WernhamA, WinklerM.2012. Health impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):43–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HowlettM, RameshM, PerlA.2009. Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy sub-systems. 3rd ed. Canada: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Council on Mining and Minerals. 2010. Health impact assessment. Available from: http://www.icmm.com/page/84142/our-work/projects/articles/health-impact-assessment-hia.
   Google Scholar
• International Finance Corporation. 2012. Performance standard 4: community health safety and security. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• KemmJ. 2000. Can health impact assessment fulfil the expectations it raises?Public Health. 114(6):431–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KemmJ. 2001. Health impact assessment: a tool for healthy public policy. Health Promot Int. 16(1):79–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KriegerGR, UtzingerJ, WinklerMS, DivallMJ, PhillipsSD, BalgeMZ, SingerBH.2010. Barbarians at the gate: storming the Gothenburg consensus. Lancet. 375(9732):2129–2131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KwiatkowskiRE, OoiM. 2003. Integrated environmental impact assessment: a Canadian example. Bull World Health Organ. 81(6):434–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshD. 2010. Stability and change: the last dualism?Crit Policy Stud. 4(1):86–101.
   Google Scholar
• MilioN. 1987. Making healthy public policy; developing the science by learning the art: an ecological framework for policy studies. Health Promot Int. 2(3):263–274.
   Google Scholar
• MorganRK. 1998. Environmental impact assessment: a methodological perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• MorganRK. 2003. Health impact assessment: the wider context. Bull World Health Organ. 81(6):390–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganRK. 2008. Institutionalising health impact assessment: the New Zealand experience. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 26(1):2–16.
   Google Scholar
• MorganRK. 2011. Health and impact assessment: are we seeing closer integration?Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31(4):404–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorganRK. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NykvistB, NilssonM. 2009. Are impact assessment procedures actually promoting sustainable development? Institutional perspectives on barriers and opportunities found in the Swedish committee system. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(1):15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PawsonR, TilleyN. 1997. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• PischkeF, CashmoreM. 2006. Decision-oriented environmental assessment: an empirical study of its theory and methods. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(7):643–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SayerA. 1992. Method in social science: a realist approach. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SayerA. 2000. Realism and social science. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• ScottWR. 2005. Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• SteinemannA. 2000. Rethinking human health impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20(6):627–645.
   Google Scholar
• TaylorS. 1984. Making beuracracies think: the environmental impact statement strategy of administrative reform. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WinklerMS, KriegerGR, DivallMJ, CisséG, WielgaM, SingerBH, TannerraM, UtsingerJ.2013. Untapped potential of health impact assessment. Bull World Health Organ. 91(4):298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar