Critical challenges to consultants in pursuing quality of Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (ESIA) in Cambodia

References

• Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B. 2004. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. Geneva: UNEP/Earthprint.
   Google Scholar
• Annandale D, Taplin R. 2003. Is environmental impact assessment regulation a ‘burden’ to private firms? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23(3):383–397. doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00002-7.
   Google Scholar
• Baker GP, Jensen MC, Murphy KJ. 1988. Compensation and incentives: practice vs. theory. J Finan. 43(3):593–616. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1988.tb04593.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang T, Nielsen E, Auberle W, Solop FI. 2013. A quantitative method to analyze the quality of EIA information in wind energy development and avian/bat assessments. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:142–150. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che Y-K, Yoo S-W. 2001. Optimal incentives for teams. Am Econ Rev. 91(3):525–541. doi:10.1257/aer.91.3.525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury N. 2014. Environmental impact assessment in India: reviewing two decades of jurisprudence. IUCNAEL EJ. 5:28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Clements T, John A, Nielsen K, An D, Tan S, Milner-Gulland E. 2010. Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecol Econ. 69(6):1283–1291. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cock AR. 2010. External actors and the relative autonomy of the ruling elite in post-UNTAC Cambodia. J Southeast Asian Stud. 41(02):241–265. doi:10.1017/S0022463410000044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELAW. 2010. Guidebook for evaluating mining project EIAs. 1st ed. USA: Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson PA. 1994. A practical guide to environmental impact assessment. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1996. EIA – a study on costs and benefits. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. Guideline on EIA – EIS review 2001. Edinburgh: Environmental Resources Management.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 1994. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. Principles and procedures, process, practice and prospects. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2005. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn T. 2004. Environmental impact assessment (EIA): a guide for reviewers. Memorial University of Newfoundland.
   Google Scholar
• Gray IM, Edwards-Jones G. 1999. A review of the quality of environmental impact assessments in the Scottish forest sector. Forestry. 72(1):1–10. doi:10.1093/forestry/72.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimsditch M. 2012. China's investments in hydropower in the Mekong region: the Kamchay Hydropower Dam. Kampot: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer C. 2005. Is Improving the effectiveness of environmental impact assessment in the UK dependent on the use of follow-up? Views from environmental consultants [Master's dissertation]. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvik L. 2007. NGOs: a ‘new class’ in international relations. Orbis. 51(2):217–238. doi:10.1016/j.orbis.2007.01.003.
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen M, Käkönen M, Tola P, Varis O. 2007. The Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: water-related conflicts with abundance of water. Econ Peace Sec J. 2:49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn A. 1993. Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Bus Rev. 71(5): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee N, Colley R, Bonde J, Simpson J. 1999. Reviewing the quality of environmental statements and environmental appraisals. Manchester: University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis S, Narim K. 2012 Nov 25. Few companies conduct environmental studies. The Cambodia Daily. Available from http://www.cambodiadaily.com/news/few-companies-conduct-environmental-studies-6288/.
   Google Scholar
• Li JC. 2008. Environmental impact assessment in developing countries: an opportunity for greater environmental security?  Working Paper No. 4. USAID and Foundation for Environmental Security and Sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Machaka R, Ganesh L, Mapfumo J. 2013. Managing the expectations between the regulatory authority and consultants in the environmental impact assessment system in Zimbabwe. Int J Sci Res. 2(10):107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Macharia SN. 2005. A framework for best practice environmental impact assessment follow-up: a case study of the Ekati Diamond Mine, Canada. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan: University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton C. 2008. Cambodia's hydropower development and China's involvement. River Coalition of Cambodia.
   Google Scholar
• MoE. 2014. List of registered ESIA consulting firms. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: Department of Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Review, Ministry of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Momtaz S, Kabir SZ. 2013. Evaluating environmental and social impact assessment in developing countries. Waltham, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Bailey M. 2009. Appraising the role of relationships between regulators and consultants for effective EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(5):284–294. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2006. A critical review of the adequacy of EIA reports – evidence from Pakistan. World Acad Sci Technol. 23(2006):64–70.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2008. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28(8):562–571. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2008.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver P. 1980. Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: theoretical investigations. Am J Sociol. 85(6):1356–1375. doi:10.1086/227168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah N-u-R. 2013. Role of EIA practitioners in improving EIA reporting quality – challenges and solutions: a case study of EIA system in Punjab Pakistan. Paper presented at: Impact Assessment: The Next Generation; Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Springer S. 2011. Articulated neoliberalism: the specificity of patronage, kleptocracy, and violence in Cambodia's neoliberalization. Environ Planning A. 43(11):2554–2570. doi:10.1068/a43402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talime LA. 2011. A critical review of the environmental impact assessment reports in Lesotho  [Master's dissertation]. Bloemfontein: University of Free State.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas I. 1998. Environmental impact assessment in Australia. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Un K, So S. 2009. Politics of natural resource use in Cambodia. Asian Aff Am Rev. 36(3):123–138. doi:10.1080/00927670903259921.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson L. 2015. Environmental impact assessment in Australia: theory and practice. Impact Assess Proj Appr. 33(2):167–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Kørnøv L, Christensen P. 2013. Critical factors for EIA implementation: literature review and research options. J Environ Manage. 114:148–157. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubair L. 2001. Challenges for environmental impact assessment in Sri Lanka. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 21(5):469–478. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00081-6.
   Google Scholar