Connecting the strategic to the tactical in SEA design: an approach to wetland conservation policy development and implementation in an urban context

References

• Acharibasam J, Noble B. 2014. Assessing the impact of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32:177–187.10.1080/14615517.2014.927557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amezaga JM, Santamaría L. 2000. Wetland connectedness and policy fragmentation: steps towards a sustainable European wetland policy. Phys Chem Earth, Part B Hydrol Ocean Atmos. 25:635–640.10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00077-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartzen BA, Dufour KW, Clark RG, Caswell FD. 2010. Trends in agricultural impact and recovery of wetlands in prairie Canada. Ecol Appl. 20:525–538.10.1890/08-1650.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolitzer B, Netusil NR. 2000. The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon. J Environ Manage. 59:185–193.10.1006/jema.2000.0351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolund P, Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ. 29:293–301.10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks R, Wardrop D, Cole C. 2006. Inventorying and monitoring wetland condition and restoration potential on a watershed basis with examples from Spring Creek Watershed, Pennsylvania, USA. Environ Manage. 38:673–687.10.1007/s00267-004-0389-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter LW, Atkinson SF. 2011. Multiple uses of indicators and indices in cumulative effects assessment and management. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:491–501.10.1016/j.eiar.2011.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherp A, Watt A, Vinichenko V. 2007. SEA and strategy formation theories: from three Ps to five Ps. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:624–644.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2000. City of Saskatoon future growth study. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2009. The official community plan bylaw No. 8769. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2010. The city of Saskatoon and the Saskatoon health region population projections (2006–2026). Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2011a. Municipal manual. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2011b. Culture plan. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2011c. Housing business plan. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2013a. City of Saskatoon & Saskatoon census metropolitan area population projection 2012–2032. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2013b. Strategic plan 2013–2023. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2014a. Our environment: the City of Saskatoon’s 2014 environmental leadership report. Saskatoon: City of Saskatoon Planning Development Branch.
   Google Scholar
• City of Saskatoon. 2014b. Sector planning. Sect Plans [Internet]. Available from: http://www.saskatoon.ca/DEPARTMENTS/CommunityServices/PlanningDevelopment/FutureGrowth/SectorPlanning/Pages/default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Cohen MJ, Brown MT. 2007. A model examining hierarchical wetland networks for watershed stormwater management. Ecol Modell. 201:179–193.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.09.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Mitigating Wetland Losses, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, Water Science and Technology Board, National Research Council. 2001. Compensating for wetland losses under the Clean Water Act. Washington (DC): The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl TE, Watmough MD. 2007. Current approaches to wetland status and trends monitoring in prairie Canada and the continental United States of America. Can J Remote Sens. 33:S17–S27.10.5589/m07-050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé MG, Duinker P, Greig L, Carver M, Servos M, McMaster M, Noble B, Schreier H, Jackson L, Munkittrick KR. 2013. A framework for assessing cumulative effects in watersheds: an introduction to Canadian case studies. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 9:363–369.10.1002/ieam.1418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenfeld JG. 2000. Evaluating wetlands within an urban context. Ecol Eng. 15:253–265.10.1016/S0925-8574(00)00080-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmelin L, Nilsson J-E. 2006. Integration of environment into regional growth policy: the lack of environmental consideration in implementation. In: Emmelin L, editor. Effective environmental assessment tools – critical reflections on concepts and practice. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Expert Choice. 2014. Expert choice comparion [Internet]. Available from: http://expertchoice.com/comparion/
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2003. Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23:155–170.10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00094-X
   Google Scholar
• Geneletti D. 2015. Research in strategic environmental assessment needs to better address analytical methods. J Environ Assess Policy Manag. 17. doi: 10.1142/S1464333215500143.
   Google Scholar
• Hamby DM. 1994. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ Monit Assess. 32:135–154.10.1007/BF00547132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herva M, Roca E. 2013. Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation. J Clean Prod. 39: 355–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huel D. 2000. Managing Saskatchewan wetlands – a landowner’s guide. Regina: Saskatchewan Wetland Conservation Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Liou M-L, Yeh S-C, Yu Y-H. 2006. Reconstruction and systemization of the methodologies for strategic environmental assessment in Taiwan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:170–184.10.1016/j.eiar.2005.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInnes R. 2010. Urban development, biodiversity and wetland management. Oxford: Bioscan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Mendoza GA, Martins H. 2006. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For Ecol Manage. 230:1–22.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2000. The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol Econ. 35:25–33.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00165-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG. 2007. Wetlands. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Mateos D, Pedrocchi C, Comín FA. 2010. Effects of wetland construction on water quality in a semi-arid catchment degraded by intensive agricultural use. Ecol Eng. 36:631–639.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen J, Noble B, Hill M. 2012. Wetland assessment and impact mitigation decision support framework for linear development projects: the Louis Riel Trail, Highway 11 North project, Saskatchewan, Canada. Can Geogr / Le Géographe Can. 56:117–139.10.1111/cag.2012.56.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble B. 2002. Strategic environmental assessment of Canadian energy policy. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 20:177–188.10.3152/147154602781766681
   Google Scholar
• Noble B. 2009. Promise and dismay: the state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:66–75.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble B, Christmas L. 2008. Strategic environmental assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation options in the Canadian agricultural sector. Environ Manage. 41:64–78.10.1007/s00267-007-9017-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble B, Hill M, Nielsen J. 2011. Environmental assessment framework for identifying and mitigating the effects of linear development to wetlands. Landsc Urban Plan. 99:133–140.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble B, Gunn J, Martin J. 2012. Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:139–147.10.1080/14615517.2012.705076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos A, Konidari P. 2011. Overview and selection of multi-criteria evaluation methods for mitigation/adaptation policy instruments. Athens: PROMITHEAS-4.
   Google Scholar
• Partidário MR. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment better practice guide – methodological guidance for strategic thinking in SEA. Lisbon: Portuguese Environment Agency and Redes Energéticas Nacionais.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2010. Impact assessment: guidelines on biodiversity-inclusive environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment. Ramsar Handbooks for the Wise Use of Wetlands, 4th ed., vol. 16. Gland, Switzerland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Rubec C, Hanson A. 2009. Wetland mitigation and compensation: Canadian experience. Wetl Ecol Manag. 17:3–14.10.1007/s11273-008-9078-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci. 1:83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Schweiger EW, Leibowitz SG, Hyman JB, Foster WE, Downing MC. 2002. Synoptic assessment of wetland function: a planning tool for protection of wetland species biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv. 11:379–406.10.1023/A:1014814226148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizo A, Noble B, Bell S. 2015. Futures analysis of urban land use and wetland change in Saskatoon, Canada: an application in strategic environmental assessment. Sustainability. 7:811–830.10.3390/su7010811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada, Census of Canada. 2011. Saskatchewan census population. Catalogue 98-310-X2011001. Ottawa (ON): Minister of Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ning L, Yu J, Xiao R, Li T. 2008. Changes of urban wetland landscape pattern and impacts of urbanization on wetland in Wuhan City. Chinese Geogr Sci. 18:47–53.10.1007/s11769-008-0047-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbrook CJ, Noble B. 2013. Science requisites for cumulative effects assessment for wetlands. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 31:318–323.10.1080/14615517.2013.833408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White L, Noble B. 2012. Strategic environmental assessment in the electricity sector: an application to electricity supply planning, Saskatchewan, Canada. Canada. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:284–295.10.1080/14615517.2012.746836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White L, Noble B. 2013. Strategic environmental assessment for sustainability: a review of a decade of academic research. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 42:60–66.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar