We are all experts! Does stakeholder engagement in health impact scoping lead to consensus? A Dutch case study

References

• Abelson J, Forest PG, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin FP. 2003. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Soc Sci Med. 57:239–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein SR. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann. 35:216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham G. 1986. Resolving environmental disputes: a decade of experience. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs RO, Kolfschoten GL, Vreede GJD. 2005. Toward a theoretical model of consensus building. Omaha, NE: AMCIS.
   Google Scholar
• Chadderton C, Elliott E, Hacking N, Shepherd M, Williams G. 2013. Health impact assessment in the UK planning system: the possibilities and limits of community engagement. Health Promot Int. 28:533–543.10.1093/heapro/das031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatham House. 2002. Chatham House rule. London: Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs; [cited 2015 Nov 9]. Available from: https://www.chathamhouse.org/about/chatham-house-rule.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez BV, Bernal AS. 2008. Planning hydroelectric power plants with the public: a case of organizational and social learning in Mexico. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 26:163–176.10.3152/146155108X363052
   Google Scholar
• Cuppen E, Brunsting S, Pesch U, Feenstra Y. 2015. How stakeholder interactions can reduce space for moral considerations in decision making: a contested CCS project in the Netherlands. Environ Planning A. 47:1963–1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delsen L. 2012. From welfare state to participation society. Welfare state reform in the Netherlands: 2003–2010. NiCE Working Paper 12-103. Nijmegen: Nijmegen Center for Economics (NiCE).
   Google Scholar
• Ducker DJ, Morgan TKKB. 2012. A psychosocial approach to stakeholder participation in environmental problem solving. The case of the contaminated site cleanup at Mapua, New Zealand. Environ Manage Sustainable Dev. 1:163–186.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos J, Monnikhof R. 2001. Lokale interactieve beleidsvorming. Een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de consequenties van interactieve beleidsvorming [Local interactive policy development. A comparative study of the consequences of interactive policy development. Utrecht: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J. 2004. The Egan review. Skills for sustainable communities. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott E, Williams G, Rolfe B. 2004. The role of lay knowledge in HIA. In: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. Health impact assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Geelen L, Scholtes M. 2014. Gezondheid binnen bereik: health impact assessment in Vught [Health within reach: health impact assessment in Vught]. Tilburg: Bureau Gezondheid, Milieu & Veiligheid GGD’en Brabant/Zeeland.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Vught. 2013. Investeren in diepgang [In-depth investment]. Vught: Gemeente Vught.
   Google Scholar
• Glucker AN, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:104–111.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert KA, Wendel AM, Kennedy SK, Dannenberg AL. 2012. Health impact assessment: a comparison of 45 local, national, and international guidelines. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 34:74–82.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, Van der Horst H, Jadad AR, Kromhout D, Leonard B, Lorig K, Loureiro MI, Van der Meer JWM, Schnabel P, Smith R, Van Weel C, Smid H. 2011. How should we define health? BMJ. 343:d4163.10.1136/bmj.d4163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Van Vliet M, Giezenberg M, Winkens B, Heerkens Y, Dagnelie PC, Knottnerus JA. 2014. Towards operationalisation of the new dynamic concept of health, leading to ‘positive health’. In: Huber M. Towards a new, dynamic concept of health. Its operationalisation and use in public health and healthcare, and in evaluating health effects of food. Driebergen: Louis Bolk Instituut; 55–82.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb DA. 1984. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mindell J, Boaz A, Joffe M, Curtis S, Birley M. 2004. Enhancing the evidence base for health impact assessment. J Epidemiol Community Health. 58:546–551.10.1136/jech.2003.012401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu. 2011. Reizen zonder spoorboekje. Programma hoogfrequent spoorvervoer [Travelling without a train schedule. High frequency rail programme]. The Hague: Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Milieu.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30:5–14.10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negev M, Davidovitch N, Garb Y, Tal A. 2013. Stakeholder participation in health impact assessment: a multicultural approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:112–120.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason P, Bradbury H. 2008. The Sage handbook of action research. London: Sage.10.4135/9781848607934
   Google Scholar
• Reed MS. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv. 141:2417–2431.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn O. 2006. Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy. 23:34–43.10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice M, Franceschini MC. 2007. Lessons learned from the application of a participatory evaluation methodology to healthy municipalities, cities and communities initiatives in selected countries of the Americas. Promot Educ. 14:68–73.10.1177/10253823070140021501
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Susskind LE, McKearnen S, Thomas-Lamar J. 1999. The consensus building handbook: a comprehensive guide to reaching agreement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wagemakers A, Vaandrager L, Koelen MA, Saan H, Leeuwis C. 2010. Community health promotion: a framework to facilitate and evaluate supportive social environments for health. Eval Program Plann. 33:428–435.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.12.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund H. 2005. In search of arenas for democratic deliberation: a Habermasian review of environmental assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 23:281–292.10.3152/147154605781765391
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins H. 2003. The need for subjectivity in EIA: discourse as a tool for sustainable development. Environ Impact Rev. 23:401–414.10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00044-1
   Google Scholar