7,012
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The stakeholder analysis for SEA of Chinese foreign direct investment: the case of ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative in Pakistan

, &
Pages 158-171 | Received 26 May 2016, Accepted 15 Oct 2016, Published online: 03 Nov 2016

References

  • Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B. 2004. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. UNEP/Earthprint.
  • [ADB] Asian Development Bank. 2003. Environmental assessment guildlines. Available from: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32635/files/environmental-assessment-guidelines.pdf
  • [ADB] Asian Development Bank. 2008. Islamic republic of pakistan country environment analysis. Available from: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32193/country-environment-analysis.pdf
  • [AEI] American Enterprise Institute [Internet]. 2005–2016. China global investment tracker. Available from: https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/
  • [AfDB] African Development Bank. 2015. Environmental and social assessment procedures. Abidjan: quality assurance and results department, compliance and safeguards division. Available from: http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/SSS_%E2%80%93vol1_%E2%80%93_Issue4_-_EN_-_Environmental_and_Social_Assessment_Procedures__ESAP_.pdf
  • [AIIB] Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. 2016. Environmental and Social Framework. Available from: http://www.aiib.org/uploadfile/2016/0226/20160226043633542.pdf
  • Alameddine M, Naja F, Abdel-Salam S, Maalouf S, Matta C. 2011. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the regulation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine products in Lebanon: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 11:1–10.10.1186/1472-6882-11-71
  • Al-sadiq A. 2013. Outward foreign direct investment and domestic investment: the case of developing countries IMF Working Paper. 13/52:1–27.10.5089/9781475517934.001
  • Amaeshi KM, Crane A. 2006. Stakeholder engagement: a mechanism for sustainable aviation. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 13:245–260.10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966
  • Ananda J, Herath G. 2003. The use of Analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy Econ. 5:13–26.10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00043-6
  • Beauchamp MA. 1965. An improved index of centrality. Behav Sci. 10:161–163.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743
  • Bhattacherjee A. 2012. Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. Florida: USF Open Access Textbooks Collection. Book 3.
  • Bragagnolo C, Geneletti D, Fischer TB. 2012. Cumulative effects in SEA of spatial plans–evidence from Italy and England. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:100–110.10.1080/14615517.2012.677522
  • Bryson JM, Patton MQ, Bowman RA. 2011. Working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Program Plann. 34:1–12.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001
  • Caniato M, Vaccari M, Visvanathan C, Zurbrügg C. 2014. Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: a step towards a holistic assessment. Waste Manag. 34:938–951.10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.011
  • Caniato M, Tudor T, Vaccari M. 2015. Understanding the perceptions, roles and interactions of stakeholder networks managing health-care waste: a case study of the Gaza Strip. Waste Manag. 35:255–264.10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.018
  • Chinyio EA, Akintoye A. 2008. Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK. Constr Manage Econ. 26:591–599.10.1080/01446190802078310
  • Cole MA, Elliott RJ. 2003. Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manage. 46:363–383.10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00021-4
  • Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 1994. North–South trade and the environment. Q J Econ. 109:755–787.10.2307/2118421
  • Costa CC, Da Cunha PR. 2010. Who are the players? finding and characterizing stakeholders in social networks. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); Jan. Galway: IEEE.
  • Daly EM, Haahr M. 2009. Social network analysis for information flow in disconnected delay-tolerant MANETs. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput. 8:606–621.10.1109/TMC.2008.161
  • De Marchi B, Funtowicz S, Lo Cascio S, Munda G. 2000. Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecol Econ. 34:267–282.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00162-2
  • De Stefano L. 2010. Facing the water framework directive challenges: a baseline of stakeholder participation in the European Union. J Environ Manage. 91:1332–1340.10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.014
  • Duanmu JL. 2014. A race to lower standards? Labor standards and location choice of outward FDI from the BRIC countries. Int Bus Rev. 23:620–634.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.10.004
  • Elliott RJ, Sun P, Chen S. 2013. Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: a Chinese city-level study. Energ Econ. 40:484–494.10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.004
  • Fath BD, Beck MB. 2005. Elucidating public perceptions of environmental behavior: a case study of Lake Lanier. Environ Model Softw. 20:485–498.10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.02.007
  • Fischer TB. 2014a. Environmental Impact Assessment Handbook for Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
  • Fischer TB. 2014b. Development of an EIA curriculum for tertiary level institutions in Pakistan – current baseline, development needs, outline and suggestions for further action NIAP. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
  • Fischer TB, Nadeem O. 2014. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Course Curriculum for Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
  • Freeman LC. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks. 1:215–239.10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  • Freeman RE. 2010. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139192675
  • Frost FA. 1995. The use of stakeholder analysis to understand ethical and moral issues in the primary resource sector. J Bus Ethics. 14:653–661.10.1007/BF00871346
  • [G2A2] Green Growth Action Alliance [Internet]. 2013. The green investment report: the ways and means to unlock private finance for green growth. World Economic Forum. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GreenInvestment_Report_2013.pdf
  • Gauthier M, Simard L, Waaub JP. 2011. Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): Critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:48–60.10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.006
  • [GoB] Government of Balochistan. 2012. The Balochistan environmental protection bill. Quetta: The Balochistan Gazette.
  • [GoP] Government of Pakistan. 1997a. Pakistan environmental protection act. Islamabad: Gazette of Pakistan.
  • Hjortsø CN. 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR – an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res. 152:667–683.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00065-1
  • Hu T, Wang H, Wu Y. 2014. Analytical framework of OFDI’s environmental and social impacts. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet]. p. 42–56. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
  • Hu T, Pan D, Wu Y. 2014. Analysis of key players in China’s outward foreign direct investment based on the conceptual matrix-part I: case sudy in Latin America. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet] p. 57–91. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
  • Hu T, Chen M, Wu Y. 2014. Analysis of key players in China’s outward foreign direct investment based on the conceptual matrix-part II: case study in Southeast Asia. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet] p. 92–120. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
  • Hu T, Wu Y, Zhu L. 2015. Environmental safeguards: is AIIB going to follow the rules? [Internet]. Pennsylvania: Wharton IGEL; [cited 2016 July 11]. Available from: https://whartonigel.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/environmental-safeguards-is-aiib-going-to-follow-the-rules/
  • [IAIA] International Association for Impact Assessment. 2002. Strategic environmental Assessment Performance Criteria [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/sp1.pdf
  • Jing H. 2011. The win-win way of economic development and environmental protection. At Home & Overseas. 1:13–17.
  • Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R. 2008. Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Kochhar MK, Pattillo MCA, Sun MY, Suphaphiphat MN, Swiston A, Tchaidze MR, Clements MBJ, Fabrizio MS, Flamini V, Redifer ML. 2015. Is the glass half empty or half full? issues in managing water challenges and policy instruments. International Monetary Fund Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1511.pdf
  • Liu TK, Sheu HY, Tseng CN. 2013. Environmental impact assessment of seawater desalination plant under the framework of integrated coastal management. Desalination. 326:10–18.10.1016/j.desal.2013.07.003
  • Madan T. 2016. What India thinks about China’s One Belt, One Road initiative (but doesn’t explicitly say) [Internet]. Washington: Brookings; [cited 2016 July 11]. Available from: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/03/14-india-china-asia-connectivity-madan
  • Maguire B, Potts J, Fletcher S. 2011. Who, when, and how? Marine planning stakeholder involvement preferences – a case study of the Solent, United Kingdom. United Kingdom Mar Pollut Bull. 62:2288–2292.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.07.017
  • Mishra R, Small A. 2016. China’s One Belt, One Road initiative: an India perspective [Internet]. Hawaii: East-West Center; [cited 2016 July 11]. Available from: http://www.eastwestcenter.org/events/china%E2%80%99s-one-belt-one-road-initiative-indian-perspective
  • Moss CA, Hwang JC, Kepnes RK. 2015. Environmental and social management system implementation handbook: general. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/09/25005721/environmental-social-management-system-implementation-handbook-general
  • Nadeem O, Fischer TB. 2011. An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan. EIA Rev. 31:36–47.
  • Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2008. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:562–571.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.02.003
  • Pak-EPA. 1997. Guidelines for the preparation and review of the environmental reports. Islamabad: Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Pak-EPA. 2000. Pakistan environmental protection agency (review of IEE and EIA) regulations. Islamabad: Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency.
  • Peterson K. 2004. The role and value of strategic environmental assessment in Estonia: stakeholders’ perspectives. Impact Assess and Proj Apprais. 22:159–165.10.3152/147154604781765969
  • Polido A, João E, Ramos TB. 2016. Exploring experts’ views and perspectives on the enhancement of strategic environmental assessment in European small islands. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 58:25–33.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.004
  • Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 22:501–518.10.1080/08941920802199202
  • Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 90:1933–1949.10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
  • Ren LJ, Shang JC. 2005. Necessity and method of public participation in strategic environmental assessment of China. Chinese Geogr Sci. 15:42–46.10.1007/s11769-003-0067-7
  • Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X. 2014. International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev. 28:123–134.10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003
  • Sabidussi G. 1966. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika. 31:581–603.10.1007/BF02289527
  • Saeed R, Sattar A, Iqbal Z, Imran M, Nadeem R. 2012. Environmental impact assessment (EIA): an overlooked instrument for sustainable development in Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 184:1909–1919.10.1007/s10661-011-2088-5
  • Sauvant KP, Maschek WA, McAllister G. 2010. Foreign direct investment by emerging market multinational enterprises, the impact of the financial crisis and recession, and challenges ahead. In: Sauvant KP, Maschek WA, McAllister G, editors. Foreign direct investments from emerging markets OECD Global Forum on International Investment; 2009 Dec 7–8; Palgrave Macmillan. p. 3–29. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/44246197.pdf10.1057/9780230112025
  • Stevens A. 2015. Pakistan lands $46 billion investment from China [Internet] Available from: http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/20/news/economy/pakistan-china-aid-infrastucture/
  • Sun H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li L, Sheng Y. 2015. A social stakeholder support assessment of low-carbon transport policy based on multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: the case of Tianjin. Transport Policy. 41:103–116.10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.01.006
  • Turcksin L, Macharis C, Lebeau K, Boureima F, Van Mierlo J, Bram S, De Ruyck J, Mertens L, Jossart JM, Gorissen L, et al. 2011. A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: the case of Belgium. Energy Policy. 39:200–214.10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.033
  • Van Buuren A, Potter K, Warner J, Fischer T. 2015. Making Space for Institutional Change? A comparative case study on regime stability and change in river flood management in the Netherlands and England Int J Water Governance. 3:81–100.
  • van Doren D, Driessen PPJ, Schijf B, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: towards a better understanding. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:120–130.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.07.002
  • Wagner UJ, Timmins CD. 2009. Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Resour Econ. 43:231–256.10.1007/s10640-008-9236-6
  • Wang DT, Gu FF, David KT, Yim CKB. 2013. When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI. Int Business Rev. 22:450–465.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.06.003
  • WaterAid: the crisis [Internet]. 2016. UK: WaterAid-water charity [cited May 24]. Available from: http://www.wateraid.org/uk/what-we-do/the-crisis
  • [WB] The World Bank. 2008–2015. World Development Indicators [Internet]. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
  • Wu Y, Hu T, Laskowski SL. 2014. To Strengthen the environmental and social risk management of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet] p. 33–41. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
  • WWF. 2005. Cross-cutting tool, stakeholder analysis[Internet]. A resource to support the implementation of the WWF Standards of Conservation Project and Programme Management. Available from: https://intranet.panda.org/documents/folder.cfm?uFolderID=60976
  • WWF, CAEC. 2015. Serial report on Belt And Road Initiative and green finance: research on international experience of environmental and social management framework for multilateral development banks Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/%E5%8C%BA%E5%9F%9F%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E7%8E%AF%E5%A2%83%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E6%A1%86%E6%9E%B6%E5%9B%BD%E9%99%85%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6_%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88.pdf
  • Yang J, Shen GQ, Bourne L, Ho CMF, Xue X. 2011. A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement. Constr Manage Econ. 29:145–162.10.1080/01446193.2010.521759
  • Zarsky L. 1999. Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign direct investment and the environment. Paris: OECD; p. 47–74.
  • Zhang Y. 2012. Scale, technique and composition effects in trade-related carbon emissions in China. Environ Resour Econ. 51:371–389.10.1007/s10640-011-9503-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.