The stakeholder analysis for SEA of Chinese foreign direct investment: the case of ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative in Pakistan

References

• Abaza H, Bisset R, Sadler B. 2004. Environmental impact assessment and strategic environmental assessment: towards an integrated approach. UNEP/Earthprint.
   Google Scholar
• [ADB] Asian Development Bank. 2003. Environmental assessment guildlines. Available from: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32635/files/environmental-assessment-guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [ADB] Asian Development Bank. 2008. Islamic republic of pakistan country environment analysis. Available from: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32193/country-environment-analysis.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [AEI] American Enterprise Institute [Internet]. 2005–2016. China global investment tracker. Available from: https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/
   Google Scholar
• [AfDB] African Development Bank. 2015. Environmental and social assessment procedures. Abidjan: quality assurance and results department, compliance and safeguards division. Available from: http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Publications/SSS_%E2%80%93vol1_%E2%80%93_Issue4_-_EN_-_Environmental_and_Social_Assessment_Procedures__ESAP_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [AIIB] Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. 2016. Environmental and Social Framework. Available from: http://www.aiib.org/uploadfile/2016/0226/20160226043633542.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Alameddine M, Naja F, Abdel-Salam S, Maalouf S, Matta C. 2011. Stakeholders’ perspectives on the regulation and integration of complementary and alternative medicine products in Lebanon: a qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 11:1–10.10.1186/1472-6882-11-71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-sadiq A. 2013. Outward foreign direct investment and domestic investment: the case of developing countries IMF Working Paper. 13/52:1–27.10.5089/9781475517934.001
   Google Scholar
• Amaeshi KM, Crane A. 2006. Stakeholder engagement: a mechanism for sustainable aviation. Corp Soc Resp Env Ma. 13:245–260.10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966
   Google Scholar
• Ananda J, Herath G. 2003. The use of Analytic hierarchy process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy Econ. 5:13–26.10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00043-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp MA. 1965. An improved index of centrality. Behav Sci. 10:161–163.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. 2012. Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. Florida: USF Open Access Textbooks Collection. Book 3.
   Google Scholar
• Bragagnolo C, Geneletti D, Fischer TB. 2012. Cumulative effects in SEA of spatial plans–evidence from Italy and England. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:100–110.10.1080/14615517.2012.677522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson JM, Patton MQ, Bowman RA. 2011. Working with evaluation stakeholders: a rationale, step-wise approach and toolkit. Eval Program Plann. 34:1–12.10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniato M, Vaccari M, Visvanathan C, Zurbrügg C. 2014. Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: a step towards a holistic assessment. Waste Manag. 34:938–951.10.1016/j.wasman.2014.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caniato M, Tudor T, Vaccari M. 2015. Understanding the perceptions, roles and interactions of stakeholder networks managing health-care waste: a case study of the Gaza Strip. Waste Manag. 35:255–264.10.1016/j.wasman.2014.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinyio EA, Akintoye A. 2008. Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK. Constr Manage Econ. 26:591–599.10.1080/01446190802078310
   Google Scholar
• Cole MA, Elliott RJ. 2003. Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations. J Environ Econ Manage. 46:363–383.10.1016/S0095-0696(03)00021-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 1994. North–South trade and the environment. Q J Econ. 109:755–787.10.2307/2118421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa CC, Da Cunha PR. 2010. Who are the players? finding and characterizing stakeholders in social networks. Proceedings of the 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS); Jan. Galway: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Daly EM, Haahr M. 2009. Social network analysis for information flow in disconnected delay-tolerant MANETs. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput. 8:606–621.10.1109/TMC.2008.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marchi B, Funtowicz S, Lo Cascio S, Munda G. 2000. Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecol Econ. 34:267–282.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00162-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano L. 2010. Facing the water framework directive challenges: a baseline of stakeholder participation in the European Union. J Environ Manage. 91:1332–1340.10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duanmu JL. 2014. A race to lower standards? Labor standards and location choice of outward FDI from the BRIC countries. Int Bus Rev. 23:620–634.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott RJ, Sun P, Chen S. 2013. Energy intensity and foreign direct investment: a Chinese city-level study. Energ Econ. 40:484–494.10.1016/j.eneco.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fath BD, Beck MB. 2005. Elucidating public perceptions of environmental behavior: a case study of Lake Lanier. Environ Model Softw. 20:485–498.10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2014a. Environmental Impact Assessment Handbook for Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2014b. Development of an EIA curriculum for tertiary level institutions in Pakistan – current baseline, development needs, outline and suggestions for further action NIAP. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Nadeem O. 2014. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Course Curriculum for Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan. Islamabad: IUCN Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman LC. 1978. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks. 1:215–239.10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RE. 2010. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139192675
   Google Scholar
• Frost FA. 1995. The use of stakeholder analysis to understand ethical and moral issues in the primary resource sector. J Bus Ethics. 14:653–661.10.1007/BF00871346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [G2A2] Green Growth Action Alliance [Internet]. 2013. The green investment report: the ways and means to unlock private finance for green growth. World Economic Forum. Available from: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GreenInvestment_Report_2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier M, Simard L, Waaub JP. 2011. Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): Critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:48–60.10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [GoB] Government of Balochistan. 2012. The Balochistan environmental protection bill. Quetta: The Balochistan Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• [GoP] Government of Pakistan. 1997a. Pakistan environmental protection act. Islamabad: Gazette of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Hjortsø CN. 2004. Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR – an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res. 152:667–683.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu T, Wang H, Wu Y. 2014. Analytical framework of OFDI’s environmental and social impacts. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet]. p. 42–56. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hu T, Pan D, Wu Y. 2014. Analysis of key players in China’s outward foreign direct investment based on the conceptual matrix-part I: case sudy in Latin America. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet] p. 57–91. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hu T, Chen M, Wu Y. 2014. Analysis of key players in China’s outward foreign direct investment based on the conceptual matrix-part II: case study in Southeast Asia. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet] p. 92–120. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hu T, Wu Y, Zhu L. 2015. Environmental safeguards: is AIIB going to follow the rules? [Internet]. Pennsylvania: Wharton IGEL; [cited 2016 July 11]. Available from: https://whartonigel.wordpress.com/2015/07/01/environmental-safeguards-is-aiib-going-to-follow-the-rules/
   Google Scholar
• [IAIA] International Association for Impact Assessment. 2002. Strategic environmental Assessment Performance Criteria [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/sp1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jing H. 2011. The win-win way of economic development and environmental protection. At Home & Overseas. 1:13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Scholes K, Whittington R. 2008. Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kochhar MK, Pattillo MCA, Sun MY, Suphaphiphat MN, Swiston A, Tchaidze MR, Clements MBJ, Fabrizio MS, Flamini V, Redifer ML. 2015. Is the glass half empty or half full? issues in managing water challenges and policy instruments. International Monetary Fund Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1511.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liu TK, Sheu HY, Tseng CN. 2013. Environmental impact assessment of seawater desalination plant under the framework of integrated coastal management. Desalination. 326:10–18.10.1016/j.desal.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madan T. 2016. What India thinks about China’s One Belt, One Road initiative (but doesn’t explicitly say) [Internet]. Washington: Brookings; [cited 2016 July 11]. Available from: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2016/03/14-india-china-asia-connectivity-madan
   Google Scholar
• Maguire B, Potts J, Fletcher S. 2011. Who, when, and how? Marine planning stakeholder involvement preferences – a case study of the Solent, United Kingdom. United Kingdom Mar Pollut Bull. 62:2288–2292.10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra R, Small A. 2016. China’s One Belt, One Road initiative: an India perspective [Internet]. Hawaii: East-West Center; [cited 2016 July 11]. Available from: http://www.eastwestcenter.org/events/china%E2%80%99s-one-belt-one-road-initiative-indian-perspective
   Google Scholar
• Moss CA, Hwang JC, Kepnes RK. 2015. Environmental and social management system implementation handbook: general. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/09/25005721/environmental-social-management-system-implementation-handbook-general
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Fischer TB. 2011. An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan. EIA Rev. 31:36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeem O, Hameed R. 2008. Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:562–571.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak-EPA. 1997. Guidelines for the preparation and review of the environmental reports. Islamabad: Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Pak-EPA. 2000. Pakistan environmental protection agency (review of IEE and EIA) regulations. Islamabad: Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson K. 2004. The role and value of strategic environmental assessment in Estonia: stakeholders’ perspectives. Impact Assess and Proj Apprais. 22:159–165.10.3152/147154604781765969
   Google Scholar
• Polido A, João E, Ramos TB. 2016. Exploring experts’ views and perspectives on the enhancement of strategic environmental assessment in European small islands. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 58:25–33.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prell C, Hubacek K, Reed M. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour. 22:501–518.10.1080/08941920802199202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 90:1933–1949.10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren LJ, Shang JC. 2005. Necessity and method of public participation in strategic environmental assessment of China. Chinese Geogr Sci. 15:42–46.10.1007/s11769-003-0067-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren S, Yuan B, Ma X, Chen X. 2014. International trade, FDI (foreign direct investment) and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Econ Rev. 28:123–134.10.1016/j.chieco.2014.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabidussi G. 1966. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika. 31:581–603.10.1007/BF02289527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed R, Sattar A, Iqbal Z, Imran M, Nadeem R. 2012. Environmental impact assessment (EIA): an overlooked instrument for sustainable development in Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess. 184:1909–1919.10.1007/s10661-011-2088-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauvant KP, Maschek WA, McAllister G. 2010. Foreign direct investment by emerging market multinational enterprises, the impact of the financial crisis and recession, and challenges ahead. In: Sauvant KP, Maschek WA, McAllister G, editors. Foreign direct investments from emerging markets OECD Global Forum on International Investment; 2009 Dec 7–8; Palgrave Macmillan. p. 3–29. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/investment/globalforum/44246197.pdf10.1057/9780230112025
   Google Scholar
• Stevens A. 2015. Pakistan lands $46 billion investment from China [Internet] Available from: http://money.cnn.com/2015/04/20/news/economy/pakistan-china-aid-infrastucture/
   Google Scholar
• Sun H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li L, Sheng Y. 2015. A social stakeholder support assessment of low-carbon transport policy based on multi-actor multi-criteria analysis: the case of Tianjin. Transport Policy. 41:103–116.10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcksin L, Macharis C, Lebeau K, Boureima F, Van Mierlo J, Bram S, De Ruyck J, Mertens L, Jossart JM, Gorissen L, et al. 2011. A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: the case of Belgium. Energy Policy. 39:200–214.10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren A, Potter K, Warner J, Fischer T. 2015. Making Space for Institutional Change? A comparative case study on regime stability and change in river flood management in the Netherlands and England Int J Water Governance. 3:81–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doren D, Driessen PPJ, Schijf B, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Evaluating the substantive effectiveness of SEA: towards a better understanding. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:120–130.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner UJ, Timmins CD. 2009. Agglomeration effects in foreign direct investment and the pollution haven hypothesis. Environ Resour Econ. 43:231–256.10.1007/s10640-008-9236-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang DT, Gu FF, David KT, Yim CKB. 2013. When does FDI matter? The roles of local institutions and ethnic origins of FDI. Int Business Rev. 22:450–465.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaterAid: the crisis [Internet]. 2016. UK: WaterAid-water charity [cited May 24]. Available from: http://www.wateraid.org/uk/what-we-do/the-crisis
   Google Scholar
• [WB] The World Bank. 2008–2015. World Development Indicators [Internet]. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Available from: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators
   Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Hu T, Laskowski SL. 2014. To Strengthen the environmental and social risk management of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. In: Hu T, Wang Y, editors. Environmental and social risk management of chinese transnational corporations [Internet] p. 33–41. Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/Yale-WWF_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WWF. 2005. Cross-cutting tool, stakeholder analysis[Internet]. A resource to support the implementation of the WWF Standards of Conservation Project and Programme Management. Available from: https://intranet.panda.org/documents/folder.cfm?uFolderID=60976
   Google Scholar
• WWF, CAEC. 2015. Serial report on Belt And Road Initiative and green finance: research on international experience of environmental and social management framework for multilateral development banks Available from: http://www.wwfchina.org/content/press/publication/2015/%E5%8C%BA%E5%9F%9F%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E6%9C%BA%E6%9E%84%E7%8E%AF%E5%A2%83%E4%B8%8E%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E6%A1%86%E6%9E%B6%E5%9B%BD%E9%99%85%E7%BB%8F%E9%AA%8C%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6_%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Shen GQ, Bourne L, Ho CMF, Xue X. 2011. A typology of operational approaches for stakeholder analysis and engagement. Constr Manage Econ. 29:145–162.10.1080/01446193.2010.521759
   Google Scholar
• Zarsky L. 1999. Havens, halos and spaghetti: untangling the evidence about foreign direct investment and the environment. Foreign direct investment and the environment. Paris: OECD; p. 47–74.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y. 2012. Scale, technique and composition effects in trade-related carbon emissions in China. Environ Resour Econ. 51:371–389.10.1007/s10640-011-9503-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar