Investigating the effectiveness of mandatory integration of health impact assessment within environmental impact assessment (EIA): a case study of Thailand

References

• Adelle C, Weiland S. 2012. Policy assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30:25–33.10.1080/14615517.2012.663256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerskog A. 2006. Outputs from implementing impact assessment in Swedish comprehensive plan 1996–2002. Bio technology. Research report number 2006:03.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen PPJ, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 14:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Baker DC, McLelland JN. 2003. Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia’s environmental assessment process for first nations’ participation in mining development. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23:581–603.
   Google Scholar
• Bina O. 2007. A critical review of the dominant lines of argumentation on the need for strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27:585–606.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Cave B, Ballantyne R. 2013. Who plans for health improvement? SEA, HIA and the separation of spatial planning and health planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 42:67–73.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A. 2013. Challenges in determining the effectiveness of sustainability assessment. In: Sustainability assessment: pluralism, practice and progress (Natural and Built Environment Series). London: Routledge; p. 37–50. ISBN-10: 0415598494.
   Google Scholar
• Bond AJ, Viegas CV, Coelho CCdSR, Selig PM. 2010. Informal knowledge processes: the underpinning for sustainability outcomes in EIA? J Cleaner Prod. 18:6–13.10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren A, Nooteboom S. 2009. Evaluating strategic environmental assessment in The Netherlands: content, process and procedure as indissoluble criteria for effectiveness. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27:145–154.10.3152/146155109X454311
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael L, Barton H, Gray S, Lease H, Pilkington P. 2012. Integration of health into urban spatial planning through impact assessment: identifying governance and policy barriers and facilitators. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 32:187–194.10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Gwilliam R, Morgan R, Cobb D, Bond A. 2004. Effectiveness of EIA: the interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 22: 295–310.10.3152/147154604781765860
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick BA, Bahr HM, Albrecht SL. 1984. Social science research methods. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C. 2012. Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment (HIA) in Thailand: a case study of a Potash mine HIA in Udon Thani. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2015. Procedural effectiveness of the new environmental health impact assessment (EHIA) process applied to power plant projects in Thailand. Impact Assessment in the Digital Era 35th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen P, Kørnøv L, Nielsen EH. 2005. EIA as regulation: Does it work? J Environ Plan Manage. 48:393–412.10.1080/09640560500067491
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2007. Qualitative inquiry & research design choosing among five approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. 2000. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage; p. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• DIW & ERC Stakeholder Public Consultation Committee. 2014. DIW & ERC stakeholder public consultation report on EGAT Bang Pakong combined cycle power plant block 5 (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• EGAT. 2010. Electric generating authority of Thailand notification No. 15/2553 Re: EGAT environmental policy.
   Google Scholar
• EGAT. c2013. Profile [Internet]; Nonthaburi; [accessed 2017 Feb 2]. https://www.egat.co.th
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Impact Evaluation Bureau: Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning (ONEP). 2014. Environmental impact assessment in Thailand (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• ERC Stakeholder Public Consultation Committee. 2014. ERC stakeholder public consultation report on EGAT Mae Moh power plant unit 4–5 replacement (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• ERC Stakeholder Public Consultation Committee. 2016a. EGAT Bang Pakong Combined cycle power plant unit 1–2 replacement. Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• ERC Stakeholder Public Consultation Committee. 2016b. ERC stakeholder public consultation report on EGAT South Bangkok (Phra Nakorn Tai) power plant replacement phase 1 (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2002. Strategic environmental assessment in transport and land use planning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Kidd S, Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D. 2009. Learning through EC directive based SEA in spatial planning? Evidence from the Brunswick region in Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:421–428.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Matuzzi M, Nowacki J. 2010. The consideration of health in strategic environmental assessment (SEA). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:200–210.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucker AN, Driessen PP, Kolhoff AJ, Runhaar HA. 2013. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: why, who and how? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:104–111.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PJ, Haigh F. 2015. Including health in environmental impact assessments: is an institutional approach useful for practice? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 33:135–141.10.1080/14615517.2015.1006417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris PJ, Harris E, Thompson S, Harris-Roxas B, Kemp L. 2009. Human health and wellbeing in environmental impact assessment in New South Wales, Australia: auditing health impacts within environmental assessments of major projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:310–318.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Impact Assessment Division. 2012. Health impact assessment guideline for power plant development project (in Thai). Nonthaburi: Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• ICEH. 2013. ICEH comments on EGAT Bang Pakong combined cycle power plant block 5 project EHIA (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• ICEH. 2014. ICEH comments on EGAT Mae Moh power plant unit 4–7 replacement project EHIA (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• ICEH. 2016a. ICEH comments on EGAT Bang Pakong combined cycle power plant unit 1–2 replacement project EHIA (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• ICEH. 2016b. ICEH comments on EGAT South Bangkok (Phra Nakorn Tai) power plant replacement phase 1 project EHIA (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Commission on Environment and Health (ICEH). 2014. Supervisory comment on project development which may cause serious adverse impact on environment and health: Mae Moh power plant unit 4–7 replacement project (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2016. 25 years of the UK EIA system: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:19–26.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolhoff AJ, Runhaar HA, Driessen PP. 2009. The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries: towards a better understanding. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27:271–282.10.3152/146155109X479459
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell JA. 2005. Qualitative research design: an interactive approach. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum LC, Ollson CA, Stefanovic IL. 2015. Advancing the practice of health impact assessment in Canada: obstacles and opportunities. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 55:98–109.10.1016/j.eiar.2015.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles MB, Huberman MA. 1994. Qualitative data analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Industry. 2009. Notification of the Ministry of Industry Re: projects or activities which may seriously affect community with respect to quality of environment, natural resources and health, 30 October B.E. 2552 (2009). Vol. 126, Part 159d.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2009. Notification of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Re: rule, procedure, method and guideline for preparation of the environmental impact assessment report or activity which may seriously affect community with respect to quality of environment, natural resources and health 29 December 2009. V. The Thai Government Gazette, Part 188d. In.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2010a. Notification of Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Re: specification of project types, scales, and regulations for activities which may cause severe effects on health, environment and natural resources No.2, 29 November 2010 (in Thai). Vol. 127, Special Part 137d. p. 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2010b. Notification of Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Re: specification of project types, scales, and regulations for activities which may cause severe effects on health, environment and natural resources B.E.2553, 31 August 2010 (in Thai). Vol. 127, Special Part 104d. Thailand; p. 34–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment. 2015. Natural Resources and Environment Ministerial Notification Re: specification of project types, scales, and regulations which may cause severe effects on health, environment and natural resources B.E.2558 No. 2. Vol. 132, Part 300d. Thailand: Thai Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2011. Health and impact assessment: Are we seeing closer integration? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:404–411.10.1016/j.eiar.2010.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Natural Resources and Environment Policy and Planning. 2013. Guideline for Health Impact Assessment in EIA report in Thailand (in Thai). Bangkok: ONEP.
   Google Scholar
• Phoolcharoen W, Sukkumnoed D, Kessomboon P. 2003. Development of health impact assessment in Thailand: recent experiences and challenges. Bull World Health Org. 81:465–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phylip-Jones J, Fischer TB. 2013. EIA for wind farms in the United Kingdom and Germany. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 15:30.
   Google Scholar
• Public Service Centre: Office of the Permanent Secretary. 2009. Public participation guideline upon the regulation of the Prime Minister Office on public consultation B.E. 2548 (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler B. 1996. International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. Ottawa: Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Schaeffer C, Smits M. 2015. From matters of fact to places of concern? Energy, environmental movements and place-making in Chile and Thailand. Geoforum. 65:146–157.10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SECOT Co. Ltd. 2013. Environmental and health impact assessment (main report): Bang Pakong combined cycle power plant block 5 project (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• SECOT Co. Ltd. 2016a. Environmental and health impact assessment (main report): South Bangkok (Phra Nakorn Tai) power plant replacement phase 1(in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• SECOT Co. Ltd. 2016b. Environmental and health impact assessment (main report): Bang Pakong Power Plant Unit 1-2 Replacement Project (updated project description-version) (in Thai). Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• Siwaraksa P, Rojjanaphaiwong S, Liamsungnoen S, Watanachiwanopakorn W, Kankamphod T. 2004. Healthy public policy and health impact assessment (HPP-HIA) (in Thai) Nonthaburi. Thailand: Health System Research Institute (HSRI).
   Google Scholar
• Stoeglehner G, Brown AL, Kørnøv LB. 2009. SEA and planning: ‘ownership’ of strategic environmental assessment by the planners is the key to its effectiveness. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27:111–120.10.3152/146155109X438742
   Google Scholar
• Tamburrini A-L, Gilhuly K, Harris-Roxas B. 2011. Enhancing benefits in health impact assessment through stakeholder consultation. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 29:195–204.10.3152/146155111X12959673796281
   Google Scholar
• Team Consulting Engineering and Management Co. Ltd. 2014. Environmental and health impact assessment (main report): Mae Moh power plant unit 4–7 replacement project (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• The Prime Minister’s Office. 2010. The Prime Minister Office Regulation Re: coordination for establishing comments made by independent commission on environment and health regarding the development of projects which may cause extreme adverse impact towards community B.E. 2553 (in Thai). Thai Government Gazette No. 127 special section 4 d 12 January BE 2553. Bangkok.
   Google Scholar
• The Prime Minister’s Office. 2011. Policy Statement of the Council of Ministers. Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra to the National Assembly. 23 August B.E. 2554 (in Thai). Bangkok: Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• The Prime Minister’s Office. 2014. Policy statement of the Council of Ministers. Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-o-cha. Delivered to National Assembly. 12 September B.E. 2557 (20014) (in Thai). Bangkok. Cabinet and Royal Gazette Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Theophilou V, Bond A, Cashmore M. 2010. Application of the SEA directive to EU structural funds: perspectives on effectiveness. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:136–144.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 2010. Strategic environmental assessment in action. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Wende W. 2002. EIA research in Germany evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the Federal Republic of Germany. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 20:93–99.
   Google Scholar