Assessing, monitoring, and addressing boomtown impacts in the US: evaluating an existing public health model

References

• Aguilera RF, Radetzki M. 2013. Shale gas and oil: fundamentally changing global energy markets. Oil Gas J. 111(12):54–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashmoore O, Evensen D, Clarke C, Krakower J, Simon J. 2016. Regional newspaper coverage of shale gas development across Ohio, New York, and Pennsylvania: similarities, differences, and lessons. Energy Res Soc Sci. 11:119–132. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldridge J, Sylvester JT. 2006. Richland County Survey final report. Missoula, MT: University of Montana.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Research & Consulting. 2013. Social impacts of oil and gas development on eastern. Montana Communities. https://mbcc.mt.gov/Portals/130/Data/Reports/2013SocialImpactBakken.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Bond A, Cobb D. 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment: theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. J Environ Manage. 88(4):1233–1248. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Bond A, Sadler B. 2009. Introduction: the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27(2):91–93. doi:10.3152/146155109x454285.
   Google Scholar
• Corso L, Wiesner P, Lenihan P. 2005. Developing the MAPP community health improvement tool. J Public Health Manag Pract. 11(5):387–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe JA, Ceresola R, Silva T, Recker N. 2015. Rural economic development under devolution: a test of local strategies. Community Dev. 1–18. doi:10.1080/15575330.2015.1080741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokshin FA. 2016. Whose backyard and what’s at issue? Spatial and ideological dynamics of local opposition to fracking in New York State, 2010 to 2013. Am Sociol Rev. 81(5):921–948.10.1177/0003122416663929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastern Montana Impact Coalition. 2015. Regional impact analysis: a study of energy related impacts on the 16- county region represented by the Eastern Montana Impact Coalition. http://epedc.com/brochures/smEMICimpactanalysis2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30(1):34–42. doi:10.1080/14615517.2012.660356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando FN, Cooley DR. 2016. Attitudes toward shale oil development in western North Dakota: the role of place based community values in attitude formation. J Rural Stud. 46:132–146.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2006. Strategic environmental assessment and transport planning: towards a generic framework for evaluating practice and developing guidance. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 24(3):183–197. doi:10.3152/147154606781765183.
   Google Scholar
• Fry M, Briggle A, Kincaid J. 2015. Fracking and environmental (in)justice in a Texas city. Ecol Econom. 117:97–107. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggerty JH, McBride K. 2016. Does local monitoring empower fracking host communities? A case study from the gas fields of Wyoming. J Rural Stud. 43(Feb 2016):235–247.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet JB. 2014. Review of risks to communities from shale energy development. Environ Sci Technol. 48(15):8321–8333. doi:10.1021/es404647x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D, Fischer TB, Kidd S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment – the significance of learning. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 27(2):133–144. doi:10.3152/146155109x454302.
   Google Scholar
• Kollock DH, Flage L, Chazdon S, Paine N, Higgins L. 2012. Ripple effect mapping: A “radiant” way to capture program impacts. J Ext. 50(5):5.
   Google Scholar
• Kroepsch A. 2016. New rig on the block: spatial policy discourse and the new suburban geography of energy production on Colorado’s Front Range. Environ Commun. 10(3):337–351.10.1080/17524032.2015.1127852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loh CG, Osland AC. 2016. Local land use planning responses to hydraulic fracturing. J Am Plann Assoc. 82(3):222–235. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1176535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastel T, Smith K, Haggerty JH, Lachapelle P, Walsh KB. 2016. Communities in action program evaluation. Bozeman (MT): Resources and Communities Research Group, Montana State University.
   Google Scholar
• Meinig DW. 1979. Symbolic landscapes: models of American community. In: Meinig DW, editor. The interpretation of ordinary landscapes. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; p. 164–193.
   Google Scholar
• NACCHO. 2016a. MAPP basics: introduction to the MAPP process. https://archived.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/mapp/framework/mappbasics.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• NACCHO. 2016b. Mobilizing for action through planning and partnerships (MAPP). https://archived.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/mapp/index.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: setting the research agenda. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe BG. 2014. Shale play politics: the intergovernmental Odyssey of American shale governance. Environ Sci Technol. 48(15):8369–8375. doi:10.1021/es4051132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richland County Health Department. 2015. Richland county quality of life assessment: 2015–2018. Montana: Richland County.
   Google Scholar
• Rifkin W, Witt K, Everingham J-A, Uhlmann V. 2015. ‘Adaptive assessment’ of cumulative socioeconomi impacts. Paper presented at the Impact Assessment in the Digital Era: 35th Annual Conferene of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Salem E. 2005. The promise of MAPP. J Public Health Manag Pract. 11(5):379–380.10.1097/00124784-200509000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JG, Blevins AL. 1983. Attitudes toward energy development in the Northern Great Plains. Rural Sociol. 48(1):148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 2014. Population estimates. https://www.census.gov/data/datasets/2016/demo/popest/counties-total.html.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2016. Shale in the United States. Dec. 15. https://www.eia.gov/energy_in_brief/article/shale_in_the_united_states.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2017. Drilling productivity report dataset.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlmann V, Rifkin W, Everingham J-A, Head B, May K. 2014. Prioritising indicators of cumulative socio-economic impacts to characterise rapid development of onshore gas resources. Extr Ind Soc. 1(2):189–199. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2014.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• VisionWest ND. 2017. VisionWest ND: project summary. https://www.visionwestnd.com/summary.php.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester B. 2010. Measuring organizational leadership demands in rural Minnesota counties. Paper presented at the 2010 Community Development Society Annual Conference, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Wurtzebach Z. 2015. Adaptive management for oil and gas development on public lands: an innovative approach to resource protection, or symbolic placation of public interests? Rev Policy Res. 32(2):246–268. doi:10.1111/ropr.12117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap NT. 2016. Unconventional shale gas development: challenges for environmental policy and EA practice. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34(2):97–109.10.1080/14615517.2016.1176405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar