Can social impact assessment contribute to social development outcomes in an emerging economy?

References

• Adler PS, Kwon SW. 2000. Social capital: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In Lesser EL, editor. Knowledge and social capital: foundations and applications. USA: Butterworth-Heinemann; p. 89.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander P, Runciman C, Ngwane T. 2013. Media briefing: community protests 2004–2013: some research findings: Social change research unit. Johannesburg: University of Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp I. 2015. Social impact assessment as a tool for social development in South Africa: an exploratory study [DPhil thesis]. Pretoria: University of Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie E. 2010. The practice of social research. International ed. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Bijl R. 2011. Never waste a good crisis: towards social sustainable development. Soc Indic Res. 102(1):157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F, Gunn JA. 2014. Impact assessment: eroding benefits through streamlining? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 45:46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremmer I. 2015. The new world of business. [accessed 12/02/2016]. http://fortune.com/2015/01/22/the-new-world-of-business/.
   Google Scholar
• Buchan D. 2003. Buy-in and social capital: by-products of social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project App. 21(3):168–172.
   Google Scholar
• Burdge R, Taylor N. 2012. When and where is Social Impact Assessment required? Paper prepared for the International Association for Impact Assessment annual meetingPorto, Portugal, May.
   Google Scholar
• Burke C, Sheldon K. 2010. Encouraging workplace innovation using the ‘world cafe’ model: Cathy Burke and Keeley Sheldon describe how giving staff a stake in discussing service changes has stimulated innovative thinking and improved care. Nurs Manage. 17(7):14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chibba M, Luiz JM. 2011. Poverty, inequality and unemployment in South Africa: Context, issues and the way forward. Eco Papers A J App Eco Policy. 30(3):307–315.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Lange J. 2013. The efficacy of South Africa’s environmental impact assessment regime: a call for responses to government’s legislative and policy framework to strengthen environmental governance and the sustainability of our developmental growth path. South Africa: Department of Environmental Affairs, Parliamentary Monitoring Group.
   Google Scholar
• [DEA] Department of Environmental Affairs. 2011. National Strategy for Sustainable Development and Action Plan. Chief Directorate: Communication. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Du Pisani JA, Sandham LA. 2006. Assessing the performance of SIA in the EIA context: A case study of South Africa. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(8):707–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrheim K. 2011. Research Design. In: Terre Blanche M, Durrheim K, Painter D, editors. Research in Practice: applied methods for the social sciences. 2nd ed. Cape Town: UCT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project App. 30(1):35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M, Syrett S. 2007. Generating social capital? The social economy and local economic development. Eur Urban Regional Stud. 14(1):55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira L. 2016. Factsheet: separating myth from reality. [accessed 2017 28 Feb]. https://africacheck.org/factsheets/separating-myth-from-reality-a-guide-to-social-grants-in-south-africa/
   Google Scholar
• Fouché CB, Bartley A. 2011. Quantitative data analysis and interpretation. In De Vos AS, Strydom H, Fouché CB, Delport CSL, editors. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 4th ed. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Fouché C, Light G. 2011. An invitation to dialogue ‘the world café’ in social work research. Qual Soc Work. 10(1):28–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks D, Vanclay F. 2013. Social impact management plans: innovation in corporate and public policy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:40–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks D, Fidler C, Brereton D, Vanclay F, Clark P. 2009. Leading practice strategies for addressing the social impacts of resource developments. Brisbane: Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland & Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation, Queensland Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gray M. 1996. Promoting social development through community social work. J Appl Soc Sci. 21:45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gray M. 2006. The progress of social development in South Africa. Int J Soc Welfare. 15(s1):S53–S64.
   Google Scholar
• Gray M. 2010. Social development and the status quo: professionalisation and Third Way co-optation. Int J Soc Welfare. 19(4):463–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G. 2000. Using guttman scaling to rank wealth: integrating quantitative and qualitative data. Field Methods. 12(4):346–357.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey B. 2011. SIA from a resource developer’s perspective. In: Vanclay F, Esteves A, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. xxvii–xxxiii.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey B, Bice S. 2014. Social impact assessment, social development programmes and social licence to operate: tensions and contradictions in intent and practice in the extractive sector. Impact Assess Project App. 32(4):327–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt L, Sandham LA. 2014. social impact assessment: the lesser sibling in the South African EIA process? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 48:20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm D, Ritchie L, Snyman K, Sunderland C. 2013. Social impact management: a review of current practice in Queensland, Australia. Impact Assess Project App. 31(3):214–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornberg C, Pauli A. 2007. Child poverty and environmental justice. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 210(5):571–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IDS] Institute for Development Studies. 2013. Promoting inclusive social protection in the post-2015 Framework. Policy briefing. Issue 39. July 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeme J. 2003. Equity, environmental justice and sustainability: incomplete approaches in climate change politics. Global Environ Change. 13(3):195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ILO] International Labour Organisation. 2011. Social protection floor for a fair and inclusive globalization. International Labour Office: Report of the Social Protection Floor Advisory Group. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• [ILO] International Labour Organisation. 2016. World employment and social outlook: trends 2016. Geneva: International Labour Office.
   Google Scholar
• [IMF] International Monitory Fund. 2013. IMF country report South Africa. Report No 13/303. Washington (DC): International Monitory Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D. 2011. Understanding the organizational context. In: Vanclay F, Esteves A, editors. New Directions in Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 20–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard A. 2008. The implementation of the white paper for social welfare: a ten-year review. Soc Work Practitioner-Res/Die Maatskaplikewerk Navorser- Praktisyn, 20 (2): 154 –173
   Google Scholar
• Lombard A. 2014. A developmental perspective in social work theory and practice. In Spitzer, H, Twikirize JM, Wairire GG, editors. Professional social work in East Africa. Towards social development, poverty reduction and gender equality. Kampala: Fountain; p. 43–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard A, Twikirize JM. 2014. Promoting social and economic equality: Social workers’ contribution to social justice and social development in South Africa and Uganda. Int Soc Work. 57(4):313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maistry M. 2012. Towards professionalisation: Journey of community development in the African and South African context. Africanus. 42(2):29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley J. 1995. Social development: The developmental perspective in social welfare. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley J. 2013. Social development and social protection: new opportunities and challenges. Dev Southern Africa. 30(1):2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midgley J. 2014. Social development: theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• [NEMA] National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998. Published in the Government Gazette (19519). Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• [NPC] National Planning Commission. 2012. National development plan 2030: Our future–make it work. Pretoria: National Planning Commission.
   Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2015. In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264235120-en.
   Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2011. Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264119536-en.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons R, Moffat K. 2014. Constructing the meaning of social licence. Soc Epistemol. 28(3–4):340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel L. 2003. Social development in a society in transition. Soc Dev Issues. 25(1/2):150–161.
   Google Scholar
• Patel L. 2005. Social welfare and social development. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel L. 2008. Getting it right and wrong: an overview of a decade of post-apartheid social welfare. Practice. 20(2):71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Patel L, Hochfeld T. 2013. Developmental social work in South Africa: translating policy into practice. Int Soc Work. 56(5):690–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel L, Schmid J, Hochfeld T. 2012. Transforming social work services in South Africa: perspectives of NPO managers. Admin Soc Work. 36(2):212–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2010. The evolution of environmental assessment debates: critical perspectives from South Africa. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 12(04):375–397.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan M, Streather T. 2011. Converting project risks to development opportunities through SIA enhancement measures: a practitioner perspective. Impact Assess Project App. 29(3):217–230.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. 1996. Published in the government gazette (15865). Pretoria: Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2012. Development indicators 2012. Presidency: Department of Performance Monitoring and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• [RSA] Republic of South Africa. 2013. South Africa yearbook 2012/2013. Pretoria: Government Communication and Information System.
   Google Scholar
• Sen A. 1999. Development as freedom. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. 2014. Poverty trends in South Africa: an examination of absolute poverty in South Africa between 2006–2011. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics South Africa. 2015. Quarterly labour force survey, quarter 3:2015 statistical release P0211. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• [UN] United Nations. 2000. United Nations millennium declaration.  General Assembly, 18. Resolution 55/2.
   Google Scholar
• [UN] United Nations. 2013. Human development report 2013. The rise of the South: human progress in a diverse world. New York (NY): United Nations Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• [UN] United Nations. 2014. The road to dignity by 2030. Ending poverty, transforming all lives, protecting the planet. Synthesis report of the secretary general on the post-2015 Agenda. New York (NY): United Nations
   Google Scholar
• [UN] United Nations, [ Sa]. The sustainable development agenda. [accessed 2016 Aug 8]. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/.
   Google Scholar
• [UNDP] United Nations Development Plan. 1997. Human development report. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ginneken W. 2013. The role of national social protection floors in extending social security to all: civil society and the social protection floor. Int Soc Sec Rev. 66(3–4):69–86.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 22(3):183–211.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project App. 21(1):5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM. 2011. Current issues and trends in social impact assessment. In Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks D. 2015. Social impact assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo (ND): International Association for Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Walker G. 2010. Environmental justice, impact assessment and the politics of knowledge: the implications of assessing the social distribution of environmental outcomes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30(5):312–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [WCED] World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• [WCSDG] World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalisation. 2004. A Fair globalisation: creating opportunities for all. Geneva: ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels JA, Retief F, Morrison-Saunders A. 2015. Appraising the value of independent EIA follow-up verifiers. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:178–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard I. 2002. An overview of poverty and inequality in South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC. Unpublished briefing paper.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock M. 2001. The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Can J Policy Res. 2(1):11–17.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2012. FAQs about development. [accessed 2015 Nov 16]. http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTSITETOOLS/0,,contentMDK:20147486~menuPK:344190~pagePK:98400~piPK:98424~theSitePK:95474,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2015. FAOs global poverty line update. [accessed 12/02/2016]. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/brief/global-poverty-line-faq.
   Google Scholar