Evidence of learning processes in EIA systems

References

• Argyris C, Schön D. 1978. Organisational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris C, Schön D. 1996. Organisational learning II – theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R. 2008. Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Chang. 18:86–98.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2009. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. J Environ Manage. 90:1692–1702.10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A. 2013. Sustainability assessment: pluralism, practice and progress. Florence, KY: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J. 2012. The state of the art of impact assessment in 2012. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30:1–4.10.1080/14615517.2012.669140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Viegas CV, Coelho CCDSR, Selig PM. 2010. Informal knowledge processes: the underpinning for sustainability outcomes in EIA? J Clean Prod. 18:6–13.10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragagnolo C, Lemos CC, Ladle RJ, Pellin A. 2017. Streamlining or sidestepping? Political pressure to revise environmental licensing and EIA in Brazil. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 65:86–90.10.1016/j.eiar.2017.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chávez BV, Bernal AS. 2008. Planning hydroelectric power plants with the public: a case of organizational and social learning in Mexico. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 26:163–176.10.3152/146155108X363052
   Google Scholar
• Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE. 1999. An organisational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev. 24:522–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong AA, Runhaar HAC, Runhaar PR, Kolhoff AJ, Driessen PPJ. 2012. Promoting system-level learning from project-level lessons. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 33:23–31.10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibella AJ, Nevis EC, Gould JM. 1996. Understanding organizational learning capability. J Manage Stud. 33:361–379.10.1111/joms.1996.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diduck A, Mitchell B. 2003. Learning, public involvement and environmental assessment: a Canadian case study. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 05:339–364.10.1142/S1464333203001401
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2014. Impact assessment: there can be strength in diversity! Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32:9–10.10.1080/14615517.2013.872844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Kidd S, Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D. 2009. Learning through EC directive based SEA in spatial planning? Evidence from the Brunswick region in Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:421–428.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick P. 2006. In it together: organizational learning through participation in environmental assessment. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 08:157–182.10.1142/S1464333206002463
   Google Scholar
• Gachechiladze-Bozhesku M. 2014. Learning from transboundary environmental impact assessment under the Espoo convention: a case of the Neman hydropower plant, Belarus. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32:81–86.10.1080/14615517.2013.873187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Kidd S, Peel D, Fischer T. 2011. Enhancing environmental appraisal effectiveness: towards an understanding of internal context conditions in organisational learning. Plan Theory Pract. 12:183–204.10.1080/14649357.2011.581008
   Google Scholar
• Glucker AN, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff A, Runhaar HAC. 2013. Public participation in environmental impact assessment: Why, who and how? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:104–111.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IEMA] Instituto Estadual de Meio Ambiente e Recursos Hídricos [Internet]. c2016. Vitória: Prodest; [accessed 2016 Jun 20]. http://www.meioambiente.es.gov.br/.
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2016. 25 years of the UK EIA system: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:19–26.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Gazzola P, Peel D, Fischer TB, Kidd S. 2009. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment – the significance of learning. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 27:133–144.10.3152/146155109X454302
   Google Scholar
• Kidd S, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U. 2011. Sustainable communities: skills and learning for place making. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press. Chapter 4, Developing the learning potential of strategic environmental assessment in spatial planning; p. 53–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kolhoff AJ, Driessen PJ, Runhaar HAC. 2013. An analysis framework for characterizing and explaining development of EIA legislation in developing countries—illustrated for Georgia, Ghana and Yemen. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 38:1–15.10.1016/j.eiar.2012.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence DP. 2003. Environmental impact assessment. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.10.1002/0471722022
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça GM. 2015. O Brasil licenciando e andando: as relações da política pública ambiental brasileira com a produção e a expansão capitalista do território [Brazil licensing and moving on: relations of environmental public policies with production and the territory's capitalist expansion]. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J. 2004. Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh C. 2010. Public participation and environmental impact assessment: purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 30:19–27.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C. 2009. A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang. 19:354–365.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdicoúlis A. 2012. Linking framework analysis. In: Perdicoúlis A, Durning B, Palframan L, editors. Furthering environmental impact assessment. 1st ed. Northamptom (MA): Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pölönen I, Hokkanen P, Jalava K. 2011. The effectiveness of the Finnish EIA system — What works, what doesn’t, and what could be improved? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:120–128.10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarikoski H. 2000. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20:681–700.10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00059-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, André P. 2013. Knowledge management in environmental impact assessment agencies: a study in Québec, Canada. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 15:1350015–1–1350015–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Mitchell R. 2017. Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:195–204.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE, Morrison-Saunders A. 2011. Learning about knowledge management for improving environmental impact assessment in a government agency: the Western Australian experience. J Environ Manage. 92:2260–2271.10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman I. 2006. Interviewing as qualitative research a guide for researches in education and the social sciences. 3rd ed. London: Teachers College.
   Google Scholar
• Silva AWL, Steil AV, Selig PM. 2013. Aprendizagem em organisações como resultados de processos de avaliação ambiental [Organisational learning in environmental assessment processes]. Ambiente & Sociedade. 16:129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman D. 2005. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP. 2001. Public involvement in EA in Canada: a transformative learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 21:113–136.10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00076-7
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair AJ, Diduck AP, Fitzpatrick P. 2008. Conceptualizing learning for sustainability through environmental assessment: critical reflections on 15 years of research. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:415–428.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwanteep K, Murayama T, Nishikizawa S. 2016. Environmental impact assessment system in Thailand and its comparison with those in China and Japan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 58:12–24.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler T, Kastenholz H, Renn O. 1995. Public participation in impact assessment: a social learning perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 15:443–463.10.1016/0195-9255(95)00043-E
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2010. Estudo de Caso: planejamento e métodos [Case study: planning and methods]. 4th ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
   Google Scholar